A bill that backers saw as a common-sense way to keep “sexually explicit” books out of kids’ hands died Tuesday in the Senate.

Critics saw it as a book ban. Many librarians opposed the bill.

“It is pure and simple censorship,” Teton County Library Director Kip Roberson said in an interview. “It removes materials from the hands of the intended audiences.”

The bill in question, House Bill 10, “Sexually explicit materials in libraries-requirements,” gained traction in Cheyenne but died Tuesday when the Senate did not take it off the upper chamber’s general file ahead of the deadline to do so.

The Wyoming House of Representatives sent it to the Senate for consideration on a 48-13 vote, with one lawmaker absent. On Feb. 25, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 in favor of the bill.

Chair Sen. Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne, Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, and Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs, voted “aye.” Sen. Gary Crum, R-Laramie and Sen. Barry Crago, R-Buffalo, voted “nay.”

Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, from left, Sens. Gary Crum, R-Laramie, John Kolb, R-Rock Springs, Chairman Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne, and Barry Crago, R-Buffalo, on Tuesday, Feb. 10 during the Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Had the measure passed, librarians would have needed to ensure there were no sexually explicit books in the children’s section of a library. The bill defines what is “sexually explicit” in graphic, technical detail.

House Bill 10 would not have, however, required sexually explicit books to be removed from all state libraries. Instead, librarians would have been required to store books deemed sexually explicit in other sections.

As drafted, the bill would have taken effect July 1.

In committee, Crago successfully amended the bill to allow counties to opt out of the policy. The amendment would be a boon to local control, Crago said.

Had the bill passed, at least one Teton County commissioner wanted to opt out: Len Carlman.

“The bill is an unconstitutional intrusion on free speech,” Carlman said in an interview. “We should have zero patience for it.”

The debate

The committee’s 3-2 vote came after an hour or so of testimony.

A youth pastor, an equality advocate, multiple librarians, a parent who homeschooled their children, attorneys and a doctor lambasted the bill. A grandfather, a public health professional and representatives for Moms for Liberty, a conservative organization that fights for parental rights in education, and the Wyoming Family Alliance, a Christian advocacy organization, spoke in favor.

Debate hinged on whether the bill was a book ban or a common-sense mechanism to keep books about sex out of kids’ hands.

In all, nine people spoke in favor of the bill. Five people spoke against it.

A copy of the book Gender Queer, a graphic memoir lawmakers say should not be accessible to minors because of its sexual content. (Tennessee Watson/WyoFile)

Rep. Ann Lucas, R-Cheyenne, a member of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, argued for the bill. She brought two books: Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer” and Erika Moen’s “Let’s Talk About It: The Teen’s Guide to Sex, Relationships and Being a Human.”

“I consider them the most notorious,” Lucas said. They “contain explicit sexual illustrations, graphic descriptions intended for mature audiences.”

In the same way the state regulates driving and buying alcohol or tobacco, it should regulate reading, said Patricia McCoy, speaking on behalf of multiple Moms for Liberty chapters across the state.

“These policies are not controversial,” McCoy said. “Parents should be able to trust that children’s sections are intentionally curated for youth.”

McCoy urged legislators to reject Crago’s amendment.

The opponents

“Gender Queer” and “Let’s Talk About It,” the two books Lucas referenced, are available at the Teton County Library. The library catalog identifies “Gender Queer” as a young adult graphic novel and “Let’s Talk About It” as young adult nonfiction.

Opponents of HB 10 argue the books are meant for their intended audience. Moving them means young people may not be able to access them, Teton County Library Director Roberson said. He also disagrees with the bill’s premise.

“There’s no pornography in the library,” Roberson said. “We’re chasing a boogeyman that doesn’t exist.”

Marylee White, Teton County Library Board chair, echoed Roberson’s sentiment.

“If you move a book to another part of the library where the intended audience for that book doesn’t go, that is censorship,” White said in an interview.

Unlike Teton County Library, which has a kids and adults section, many small libraries across the Equality State have only one room, White said. Those libraries would have had to get rid of the books altogether if the bill passed, she said.

Library volunteer Joey Speakman dusts books at the Saratoga Branch in October 2025. (Katie Klingsporn/WyoFile)

Other opponents, like Melissa Snider, said there are not multiple sections in school libraries, meaning the bill would have been a ban in those locations. School libraries are often just one room, staffed by one person, who would have to review the new policies — and books on the shelf — for compliance.

Snider is a library media specialist for Munger Mountain Elementary School in Jackson. She said she was speaking on behalf of the Wyoming Library Association’s School Library Interest Group, not the Teton County School District.

When parents have a concern about a book in the library, Snider is ready to talk to them. The state does not need to be involved, she said.

“They just obviously don’t trust us to do our jobs,” Snider said. “That’s what really hurts about it.”

A lifelong Coloradan, Charley made his way north to Jackson to report on county government for the Jackson Hole News&Guide. Charley likes slow-cooking spaghetti Bolognese and racing sailboats.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Want to make an actual difference?
    Look to recent law out of Australia. No social media for under kids 16.

    I dont understand the library focus, do kids even read books anymore? They hold “the world” in their hand be it Apple or Samsung.

  2. Get rid of the bible and all the troubles will go away, including so called christian advocacy organizations and other anti American cults.

    1. That’s a really bigoted comment, Gordon.
      Maybe you dont realize this but there is A LOT of the Bible that is extremely beneficial to anyone that reads it.

      Maybe try Matthew Chapters 5-7 and let me know what you find objectionable.