Natrona County officials are drafting a list of potential conditions, permits and expectations they will require of Prometheus Hyperscale, the company proposing a 1,250-megawatt artificial intelligence computing complex east of Casper.

Top of mind, according to county commissioners who spoke to WyoFile, are assurances that the data center’s water consumption and electricity needs don’t harm residents, as well as measures to keep noise and light pollution in check and a yet-to-be-determined sense of whether the data center would be a net benefit for the community.

“This process is just barely even kicking off,” Natrona County Commission Chairman Jim Milne said. “It’s going to be a long, long haul, and we have ample opportunity to talk to them and adjust.”

Prometheus Hyperscale began publicly floating its Natrona County project last spring, and then addressed commissioners during a packed meeting in September. Prometheus founder Trenton Thornock listed his bona fides as a sixth-generation Uinta County rancher with close ties to Wyoming’s natural resources and its residents. 

A worker tests a natural gas-fueled electric generating engine at Mesa Power Solutions’ manufacturing shop in Casper. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

His company’s data center here — with an initial investment of about $500 million and potential to expand — is designed to use a closed-loop cooling system to limit water usage, as well as injection wells to sequester carbon dioxide emissions from a fleet of natural gas-fueled electric generators to power the operation separately from the public grid.

In addition to creating new jobs and injecting a new stream of tax revenue into the county, Thornock’s pitch included bypassing a one-shop-stop state industrial permitting process to tailor-fit the project to Natrona County parameters. While the Wyoming Industrial Siting Council is “cumbersome and time-consuming,” working directly with the county would not forgo “any applicable environmental or regulatory requirements,” Oil City News reported Thornock saying at a September commission meeting.

The idea has its appeal, Milne and other commissioners have said. And Prometheus is already several phases into a very similar process in Uinta County, where the company is building another data center complex.

“They’re still going to have to go through the same stuff that they would have to go through with [the Industrial Siting Council],” Commissioner Dave North told WyoFile, noting the project must still undergo reviews to comply with state wildlife, water and myriad other state statutes. “They’re not getting out of anything. It just expedites the whole process.”

State versus county review

Typically, industrial projects of a certain scale must undergo a Wyoming Industrial Siting Act review and obtain a permit from the Industrial Siting Council, which requires some 19 different state and federal agencies to analyze and weigh in on projects.

But a handful of prospective data center developers have favored opting out of the  Industrial Siting Act. The “industrial park exemption” allows developers to approach counties that have robust zoning to, essentially, take on the task, if they’re willing. This is a potentially attractive option for counties with expert staff and means, like Natrona County, according to North.

A view from Hat Six Road east of Casper, a region where a developer proposes to build a data center complex. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“We can tell them exactly what we want,” North said. “If you don’t have zoning, and you don’t have a development department, this would be a wreck.”

Though it adds work for county officials who may not have industrial permitting expertise, commissioners still get to consider project-specific reviews from state and federal agencies, he said. Plus, unlike the appointed members of the Industrial Siting Council, Natrona County officials are beholden to their constituents and can ask developers to invest in the community beyond its scope of work and regulations they’re held to — like ponying up donations for parks and other services.

Residents who packed a Sept. 1, 2026, Natrona County Board of Commissioners meeting were asked to raise their hands if they support a proposal by Prometheus Hyperscale to build a data center. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“We’ve got to keep an open mind on both sides,” Milne said. “We need to be fair to the developer and to the public.”

North noted that the county’s review and negotiations with Prometheus won’t be directly decided by residents, but he noted that residents will have the opportunity to quiz both company and county officials and weigh in.

“I will tell you, we’re listening,” North said. “Not only are we listening to the concerns of the citizens, but I’m passing that information on to Prometheus and saying, ‘You’re going to have to address this.'”

Caution signs ahead

Though some counties might have the resources and wherewithal to take on such a task, there are potential pitfalls and the Industrial Siting Council process has merits, local environmental watchdog groups told WyoFile.

Those detailed reviews from 19 state and federal agencies that the council requires are not necessarily wholly transferable in developer-county negotiations, according to Lander-based Wyoming Outdoor Council Data Center Campaign Manager Jocelyn Wulf.

Prometheus Hyperscale founder Trenton Thornock. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Unless county officials press for specifics, “they’re not being reviewed as extensively and comprehensively by these agencies,” Wulf said. “They have to consider that they need to cover every possible eventuality on their own. So, in theory, these counties could have far fewer regulations than the [Industrial Siting Act requirements], or they could also have far more. It could go a lot of ways, really.”

Also, not every county with an industrial park exemption is equipped to get what they expect from shrewd, well-monied corporations.

“We’re afraid it could become kind of a race to the bottom,” Outdoor Council Energy and Climate Policy Director John Burrows said. “That’s a good reason, I think, to have more of a state focus on the regulation of data centers.”

There are no applications now before Natrona County officials, according to North and Milne. Both stress there will be public forums and opportunities to ask questions and weigh in.

For its part, Prometheus said it also plans to conduct public meetings in Natrona County.

“We want them to be useful, and plan to schedule them once we have more concrete information to share,” Prometheus Chief of Staff Abby Pick told WyoFile via email. “We are committed to moving through that process transparently, working alongside local officials and the community every step of the way.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *