Dear Gov. Mark Gordon, Secretary of State Chuck Gray and Attorney General Keith Kautz,

Before taking office, each of you swore an oath to support, protect and defend the constitutions of the U.S. and Wyoming. Both documents make clear that state and local officials, not the federal government, run and administer elections.

Opinion

We write to you as everyday Wyomingites. Three of us have served as election judges in numerous election cycles, and we can attest to the security and integrity of our state’s elections. We also write to you as members of Powder River Basin Resource Council, a group of people whose views span the ideological spectrum. Across our political differences, we come together around a shared commitment to the democratic principles and practices that give Wyomingites the power to determine our shared future. Nothing is more fundamental to that power than every eligible voter’s right to cast a ballot free of intimidation and interference, and to have that ballot counted.

We invite each of you to join us in this shared commitment to free and democratic elections by issuing a statement before Election Day that assures Wyomingites that you have full confidence in our state’s elections, election administrators and election results. Further, we ask that you state clearly that you will, if need be, use the power of your office to stand up to any outside political effort, including from the federal government, that seeks to disrupt the coming elections and intimidate voters and election workers, which would violate both constitutions you swore an oath to. 

Our request reflects an increasingly clear need for state officials to make such a statement. The federal government has already made numerous attempts this year to meddle in elections. One such attempt occurred right here in Wyoming during our primary elections, when U.S. Department of Justice observers appeared at a polling location in Cheyenne, trying to interview voters and access voting machines. They acted in ways that Gov. Gordon described as “aggressive, unexpected, disruptive — certainly didn’t seem to show respect for the state.” Laramie County Clerk Debra Lee said the DOJ observers showed a “complete disregard for our state laws and administration of our elections.”

“I feel very strongly about the federal government coming in and taking our guns — I don’t like that,” Gordon said. “And I don’t like the federal government coming in and taking our votes, either.”

We applaud and thank the governor for making this statement, and we ask that he issue another statement before the elections warning the federal government to stay out of our elections and reiterating his commitment to protecting our vote.

Gov. Mark Gordon speaks during the opening plenary of the Education Commission of the States’ 2026 National Forum on Education Policy on Wednesday, July 10, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Patrick Siebert/Office of Maryland Gov. Wes Moore)

Among Republican leaders who have stood up to federal meddling in state elections is Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, the state’s chief election official who has refused to comply with a DOJ order to hand over the state’s entire, unredacted voter database. Henderson has rightly argued that the order has no federal legal basis and violates Utah data privacy laws. Even as she now faces a lawsuit from the DOJ, which a federal judge dismissed last week and the DOJ quickly vowed to appeal, she has held fast to the oath she took to the U.S. and Utah constitutions. 

“Utahns can be assured that my office will always follow the Constitution and the law, protect voters’ rights, and administer free and fair elections,” Henderson said in response to the DOJ lawsuit. 

Also worthy of applause is Attorney General Kautz, who, alongside his Republican counterparts in Idaho, North Dakota, Utah and 11 other states, refused to back the president’s anti-mail-in voting executive order, knowing the chaos it would unleash and the federal interference it would enable in their states’ elections. We also thank him for his legal opinion released  this week that states that any monitors the department sends to Wyoming’s polling locations must remain outside, 100 yards from the polls and must not interview voters without their consent, in accordance with state law. Lee says the DOJ has informed her they will comply with that opinion.

At a time when the president himself has urged his supporters to “cheat like hell” in the coming elections, and the Department of Justice has told Wyoming it will again have observers at our polls, we sincerely hope that Secretary of State Gray finds the courage and leadership that the governor and attorney general have exemplified. We hope that all three of you issue a public statement before the election that shows or confirms your shared commitment to protecting our vote and are united in holding the DOJ accountable to the agreement it made to respect Wyoming’s voting laws.

Marguerite Herman lives in Cheyenne and is active in several service and civic groups. She advocates to protect Wyoming’s free, fair, secure and accessible elections.

Rob Davidson lives in Sheridan. He retired from the oil and gas industry and now works on public lands and policy. He has served as an election judge in two Wyoming counties, on the post-election canvassing...

Barbara Chase lives in Sheridan and worked in the mining industry until her retirement in 2014. She has served as an election judge in the last five election cycles for Sheridan County,

Andrea Knutson lives in Sheridan and has been an election judge for many years. She is active in many community groups, including Powder River Basin Resource Council, Sheridan County Land Trust, Big Horn...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *