Advocates have worked for nearly a decade to overhaul and improve how Wyoming teaches children to read. As the years have ticked by, struggling children have advanced through school grades without being identified or properly supported, they say. 

Educators, parents and elected officials told the House Education Committee on Tuesday in Cheyenne that for the sake of those children, the state cannot wait any longer.

“If you do not pass this bill, you are failing Wyoming’s children,” said Cheyenne mother Chandel Pine, who founded a literacy advocacy nonprofit after her son died by suicide following years of struggling to learn to read. “You can go dig their grave or just send them to federal prison now, because you are setting them up for a life of failure.”

Despite concerns from some committee members that it will add to the already-unwieldy burden of certification and work for educators, the committee voted 5-3 to advance Senate File 59, “K-12 language and literacy program.

The bill aims to ensure that every K-12 Wyoming student develops strong language and literacy skills and that struggling readers do not fall through the cracks. It would establish an evidence-based system of instruction, intervention and professional development to provide teachers, families and students with comprehensive and effective tools for teaching reading and addressing deficiencies.

The bill now heads to the House floor for consideration. Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder told the committee it’s overdue. 

“Today, 40 states in the country have passed legislation that is aligned with the science of reading,” she said. “Frankly, I’m tired of Wyoming being late to the party.”

Shifting standards

Literacy instruction has emerged as a nationwide issue with the downturn of reading scores in recent years. While Wyoming continues to rank comparatively high in national testing, literacy challenges still impact students here.

In 2024, 36% of the state’s fourth graders and 29% of eighth graders performed at or above the proficient level in reading on national standardized NAEP tests, lower than the previous five years. 

Some 32% of Wyoming fourth graders performed below basic levels, which was a slight increase from 29% in 2022. For eighth graders, 30% scored below basic levels in 2024, up one percentage point from 2022.

Categories include below basic, basic, proficient and advanced. 

Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder chats with K-3 students at Gannett Peak Elementary in Lander on March 19, 2024. (Katie Klingsporn/WyoFile)

News reports and studies have shifted how the literacy field views reading instruction, and many states have passed legislation to ensure that evidence-based learning instruction is available to all students. 

Wyoming’s version resulted largely from the work of a literacy subcommittee with input from stakeholders including a group of parents and educators focused on better identification and treatment of conditions like dyslexia. 

The Joint Education Committee sponsored the bill, which cruised through the Senate with little trouble. 

Concerns 

When the House Education Committee took it up Tuesday, however, some lawmakers reported constituent concern on the measure. One source is teachers worried about a raft of new certifications or requirements they would have to attain to keep their jobs. 

“There is a lot of pushback from teachers,” Rep. Tomi Strock, R-Douglas, said. “They feel that maybe they’ll lose their jobs or positions, or they feel they’re very adequate in what they’re doing. There just seems to be this fear in some of the districts.”

Rep. Julie Jarvis, a Casper Republican, warned that the implementation might result in unintended hurdles for educators and contribute to the state’s teacher shortage.  

She requested that “there be some leeway for teachers to choose to do this if they want to, but this not be a ‘have-to.’” Jarvis isn’t opposed to the bill, she added. 

“The literacy piece of this I don’t question,” she said. “I really question the enactment.” 

Others said the bill’s provisions aren’t necessarily appropriate for secondary students and should be limited to K-6. 

Pinedale literacy specialist Faith Howard leads a session on filling literacy gaps in high school students during the Wyoming Department of Education’s “Embracing Literacy” conference in June 2025. (Zach Agee/WyoFile)

There has been ample work and opportunity to chime in, Degenfelder said, including interim study. 

“This bill has been worked,” she said. “I fear that by kicking the can down the road and not moving forward … that’s the very reason why people in our state, that’s why they’re upset with government, because we move too darn slow, and it takes us years — decades — to move the needle. That’s why it’s important that we move forward.”

In response to the other pushback regarding teacher burdens, Degendfelder acknowledged that change is hard. 

“We also have a lot of teachers that are in support of this,” she said. “They’re excited to raise the bar when it comes to literacy, because there’s no teacher out there that doesn’t want a child to learn how to read.”

Pinedale teacher Faith Howard, who spearheaded a secondary literacy program that has made huge gains in her own district, pushed back on the idea that additional professional development will lead to teacher burnout. 

“The thing that’s going to burn out teachers is not educating them more about how to teach students how to read or how to support their struggling readers,” Howard said. “It’s actually the other way around. More teachers will leave because they are feeling the burden of inheriting students who cannot read and they don’t have the tools to be able to help them or support them.”

Motion to table 

Rep. JD Williams, R-Lusk, made a motion to table the bill, citing too many questions and concerns still lingering from his constituents. His motion failed by a 4-4 vote. 

Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Worland, said there is urgency and noted the amount of work that’s already gone into it. 

“These kids are suffering,” Lawley said. “I really am concerned … these kids are getting out of the system and they can’t read.” 

When the bill came up for a second vote, the committee passed it.

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *