Environment, Natural Resources, Photo Friday

Teton-Yellowstone Tornado

by Angus M. Thuermer Jr. July 21, 2017

The Teton-Yellowstone Tornado caused damage along a 24.4 mile path through the Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Teton Wilderness and into Yellowstone National Park. Forest Service fire specialist Andy Norman photographed the path, likely in 1987. Many of the downed trees burned in a fire in 1988. (U.S. Forest Service/Andy Norman)

Today marks the 30th anniversary of the Teton-Yellowstone Tornado, a windstorm that ripped a 24.4-mile path through the Teton Wilderness, over the Continental Divide and into Yellowstone National Park.

The tornado downed a million trees but spared people. Nine campers in the Bridger-Teton National Forest at Enos Lake were among the handful of witnesses. They described a fast-approaching train-like noise, golf-ball-size hail, but no funnel cloud.

Dr. Tetsuya Theodore Fujita, the man who invented the tornado scale that’s named after him and still in use, wrote that the event occurred in “a most unlikely place.” He classified it as an F4 tornado, on his Fujita Scale that tops out at F5. As such, winds blew at between 207 and 260 mph, “an intensity rarely experienced in the Rockies.”

“Small spotty areas affected by F4 winds were characterized by flattened Engelmann spruce trees, 30 to 40 cm [about 1 foot 2 inches] in diameter, spattered by wind-blown topsoil and debarked,” Fujita wrote in Monthly Weather Review.

Never miss a Photo — sign up for WyoFile’s free weekly newsletter

The storm touched down at 1:28 p.m. in the wilderness just north of Jackson Hole and the small community of Moran. It took about 26 minutes to ravage its path, which averaged 1.6 miles wide. It crossed the Continental Divide at 10,070 feet before descending to and crossing the Yellowstone River.

Twenty-eight stereo aerial photographs revealed 72 microbursts and four “spinup swirl marks.” It earned tornado status because Fujita discovered “where rotational winds were evidenced by damage analyses.”

Fujita described the tornado’s source as “a mesocyclone that formed at the intersection of a mesohigh boundary and a warm front.” Alas, the wildfires fires of 1988 burned up all the evidence, cutting his research short.

Andy Norman, who works for the Bridger-Teton National Forest as a fuels and prescribed fire specialist, took the photograph above, likely in 1987.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)... More by Angus M. Thuermer Jr.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.