The 68th Wyoming Legislature’s budget session has concluded. As with any session, some beneficial bills were passed while others were not. However, the most significant takeaway from this session is clear: public opinion matters.

Opinion

At the start of the session, many of us expected a heated ideological debate over the state budget. The Joint Appropriations Committee, led by the Freedom Caucus, introduced a budget proposal that included sweeping cuts. These cuts targeted the University of Wyoming, Wyoming Public Media and Wyoming Public Television, and even proposed the complete defunding of the Wyoming Business Council. Additionally, the budget offered no pay raises for most state employees and included other reductions, all reflecting the Freedom Caucus’s belief that government should be reduced in size, even though state revenues were strong. (Oddly, though, the Freedom Caucus seemed to want a government big enough to control what books Wyoming families could allow their children to read in libraries.)

Once the session began, though, Wyoming citizens made their voices heard. Through emails, phone calls and personal interactions, they told us they want the freedom to choose reading materials for their children. They wanted a strong university that offers high-quality opportunities for all students. They wanted the news and cultural programming provided by Wyoming’s public broadcasting systems. They wanted the state to remain competitive in attracting new companies and jobs — opportunities that help keep young people in Wyoming. They wanted fair wages for state workers, access to affordable housing, and the essential services that a healthy state government provides. Ultimately, almost all of the service cuts proposed by the Freedom Caucus were rejected.

The key lesson for service-oriented policymakers is that Wyoming residents believe the current size of their state government is appropriate. They value the services they receive and are willing to pay for them. This sentiment is supported by a scientific survey conducted by the University of Wyoming several years ago. When asked if they would be willing to give up certain services in exchange for lower taxes or pay higher taxes for new services, citizens overall indicated satisfaction with the current level of services and were not willing to reduce services in exchange for lower taxes.

The Wyoming Capitol during the 2026 legislative budget session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

However, the Freedom Caucus seems to have learned a different lesson. Blinded by their ideology, they concluded that they simply did not push their agenda forcefully enough. Their takeaway appears to be that they need to take control of the Wyoming Senate, rather than to recognize and serve the needs of Wyoming citizens.

The Freedom Caucus does not reflect Wyoming values. From May 14 through May 29, candidates may file nominating papers for elected office in Wyoming. On Aug. 18, 2026, voters will have the opportunity to select party nominees for all offices. When you vote on Aug. 18, and again in the general election on Nov. 3, choose candidates who are committed to serving the needs of Wyomingites, rather than those who just want to advance their own ideological agenda.

Ken Chestek serves House District 13 in the Wyoming Legislature and is a University of Wyoming emeritus professor of law.

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Vote out freedom caucus out..i am willing to exercise my right to change from dem to rep by may13th.to assure they continue to hear our voice.wyoming aint fer sale

  2. While some other proposed cuts were unwarranted, it’s a shame that the Legislature did not completely disband the Wyoming Business Council. It’s opaque, bureaucratic, wasteful, and counterproductive. Maybe next year!

  3. I was extremely pleased with the citizens of Wyoming and their support for our essential services. I had been fearful that citizens would only see potentially lower taxes and not realize how that would impact our citizens, towns and counties.

  4. Where does all the money that is being slashed go? Who reaps the benefit in WY?
    In national politics it goes to the military and buying of fancy planes for government officials. Oh, and for litigation.

  5. Thank you Ken for spelling it out, in plain English, what these people do and how they operate.

  6. Thank you for your comments. They are spot on. The Wyoming Freedom Caucus doesn’t believe in limited government control they believe in ABSOLUTE government control. Just look at the legislation for K-12 education.

  7. Well Ken, the people of Wyoming will get to decide if they want a change in November.
    If I’m not mistaken the “Freedom Caucus” members were probably elected by their constituents running on the issues they addressed during their legislative sessions. If that is the case, they were doing what their constituents wanted.

  8. Thank you Jen. This summary was spot on. The white Christian nationalist party (aka FC) will keep trying to destroy the environment,take away women’s rights, defund education and insert religion into every corner of the state.
    The primaries are CRITICAL. That is more important than the midterm elections.
    Open primaries need to be instituted in WY!!!