In Wyoming, reading is not a guaranteed right — it’s a privilege. For children with dyslexia, the state’s failure to provide timely, evidence-based support has created a crisis. Education should level the playing field, but in Wyoming, only families with legal knowledge and financial means can secure necessary services. For many, the system’s failure is not just inadequate — it’s tragic.

Opinion

A hidden crisis

Dyslexia affects 10-20% of the population and is the most common learning disability. Yet Wyoming’s schools lack a structured, evidence-based approach to identifying and supporting dyslexic students. Without early intervention, these children fall behind academically and suffer emotionally, while their needs go unrecognized.

A system that favors the privileged

Wyoming lacks strong dyslexia laws and consistent policies. Many students are never screened and teachers are not required to use evidence-based methods. Families with resources can pay for private evaluations, legal help and tutoring. Those without are left behind — especially in rural communities — trapped in a cycle of illiteracy.

Deliberate indifference

This is not just a moral failure — it is a legal one. Wyoming school districts are violating federal law. By failing to provide appropriate accommodations and evidence-based interventions for students with dyslexia, they are in direct violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. These laws exist to protect the rights of students with disabilities.

The Wyoming Department of Education and the school districts have actual knowledge of the educational needs of students with dyslexia. They are aware of what these students require to access education equally, yet often fail to act or respond with reckless indifference. Parents repeatedly voice concerns and file complaints, but many are ignored, dismissed or forced into lengthy legal battles. This deliberate inaction, despite clear evidence and expert recommendations, constitutes more than neglect — it is a violation of students’ civil rights.

The harm is well known: When schools deny timely, structured literacy instruction, dyslexic children fall further behind, experience emotional distress and lose confidence. Families, when they can afford to, are spending tens of thousands of dollars on private services — services that are supposed to be provided under federal law at no cost to them. Meanwhile, students from low-income or rural communities are left without recourse, further entrenching inequity.

Wyoming’s neglect is not only unethical — it is unlawful.

Dyslexia and potential

Dyslexia is not a marker of low intelligence. Many successful figures — from Albert Einstein to Stephen Spielberg to Bill Gates — have dyslexia. These children are bright and capable, but Wyoming’s inaction robs them of their future. If the state truly valued these students, it would invest in proper teacher training and enforce policies that ensure access to structured literacy.

A call to action

Wyoming must:

  • Mandate early and ongoing dyslexia screening for K-12 students.
  • Require teacher certification in International Dyslexia Association-approved methods in every school.
  • Establish legally enforceable dyslexia policies that ensure schools provide structured literacy instruction.
  • Remove financial discrimination for families seeking basic services for their children to read.

The state’s continued inaction sends a clear message: Literacy is not a right for all — it is a privilege reserved for those who can afford to fight for it. It’s time to make it a right for everyone. The state knows what works — so why isn’t it acting?

Annie McGlothlin, Kari Roden and Chandel Pine are part of a determined group of Wyoming moms united to fight for change in an education system that has long failed students with dyslexia. Frustrated by...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *