This summer, families arriving at reservoirs across Wyoming have encountered an unsettling message: Stay out of the water and keep dogs away. Why? The water may be poisonous.

Opinion

The state has issued toxic algae advisories at 20 lakes and reservoirs, including Boysen, Pathfinder, Glendo, Guernsey, Grayrocks, Big Sandy, Bighorn, High Savery and Lake DeSmet. These are places where generations of Wyoming families have swum, fished, camped, boated and cooled off during the hottest weeks of the year. They expect them to be clean and safe.

The technical term is “harmful cyanobacteria bloom.” I prefer “toxic algae outbreak” because it better describes what people see and what is at stake: Green scum, floating clumps, paintlike streaks and water that can make people or animals seriously ill.

Contact with toxic algae can cause skin irritation, vomiting, diarrhea and other illnesses. Some cyanobacteria produce toxins that affect the liver or nervous system. Dogs face an especially serious risk because they drink while swimming and lick water and algae from their fur. A dog can die within hours of exposure.

Wyoming agencies are right to investigate reports, test the water, post signs and alert the public. Those warnings may prevent a child from getting sick or save someone’s cherished pet.

Still, a warning sign means prevention has already failed.

But imagine if we could have avoided the whole mess to begin with through smart prevention efforts.

Many affected waters are in watersheds where agriculture and livestock production are dominant land uses. Runoff carrying fertilizer, manure and eroding soil can deliver phosphorus and nitrogen to streams and reservoirs, feeding the toxic algae. Livestock with direct access to waterways and irrigation return flows can also contribute pollution. In more developed areas, failing septic systems and sewage discharges can add to this problem. Warmer water creates conditions in which outbreaks occur more readily.

This is not about blaming every ranch or farm, and agriculture has not been proven to cause every outbreak. It does mean Wyoming should examine the pollution sources most likely to affect these waters and address them before toxic conditions threaten public health and recreation each summer.

For many Wyoming communities, a reservoir is where people spend summer weekends, children learn to swim and boaters enjoy our public waters. These waters also support irrigation, fisheries, wildlife, livestock, and in some places, drinking water supplies. When toxic algae make them unsafe, the loss is personal as well as economic.

We should not settle into a routine in which outbreaks occur, the state posts an advisory and everyone waits for colder weather — only to repeat the cycle next year.

Wyoming needs a prevention strategy focused on keeping pollution out of the water.

The state should identify waters with recurring outbreaks, determine where fertilizer, manure, sewage and other pollution enter them, and develop practical, enforceable plans to reduce those loads. Where agricultural pollution is a significant source, Wyoming should work with producers — and require action where necessary — to keep manure, fertilizer and soil on the land and out of rivers and reservoirs.

Solutions can include fencing livestock away from sensitive shorelines and streams, providing off-channel watering, improving manure storage and application, restoring streamside vegetation, reducing erosion and managing irrigation return flows. State and federal conservation programs should direct more money and technical assistance toward watersheds with repeated toxic algae problems.

Communities also need help repairing failing sewage and septic systems, and wastewater permits must protect downstream waters. But Wyoming’s response should reflect the landscape. In many affected watersheds, agricultural runoff and livestock-related pollution deserve more attention.

Monitoring remains important. Wyoming needs enough staff, sampling and laboratory capacity to quickly find outbreaks and tell the public to avoid the area. But monitoring documents the problem, it does not prevent it.

The state also needs clear, protective water quality standards and measurable pollution-reduction goals. Without them, agencies can record the same outbreaks each summer without anyone being responsible for improving the water.

These measures will cost money, but so will allowing the problem to get worse. Toxic algae restricts swimming, boating, fishing, threatens pets and livestock, harms local businesses and can raise drinking-water treatment costs.

People should continue to check state advisories before heading to the water. Avoid green or discolored water, surface scum, floating clumps, foul smells and dead fish. Keep children and dogs out of suspicious water and report possible outbreaks to the Department of Environmental Quality.

The recent advisories tell us that pollution prevention is not keeping pace with the threat.

Wyoming’s leaders have a responsibility to protect clean water and public health. They should track down the sources of pollution, reduce fertilizer and manure pollution, strengthen water-quality safeguards and act before another favorite lake becomes unsafe.

Justin Hayes is the Northern Rockies Conservation Director for American Rivers, a conservation organization working to make every river clean and healthy for people and wildlife. AmericanRivers.org

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *