Not unlike the current moment, roughly a decade ago a political push to do away with large swaths of federal lands in the West was gaining steam.
Utah Republican U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz ran a bill at the time that would have transferred 3.3 million acres of the federal estate to state ownership. The bill was later pulled, and the representative resigned his congressional seat after the proposal whipped hunters and anglers into a fury.
The movement crossed state lines into Wyoming. During state lawmakers’ 2015 general session in Cheyenne, a legislative committee drafted a bill that demanded the transfer of vast tracts of federal lands to Wyoming. Later, the measure was amended to require a study of Wyoming managing federal lands, not owning them.
The Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments was ultimately given $75,000 for the study, and it picked Jackson-based Y2 Consultants to complete the analysis. When the 357-page study was completed the following fall, state land managers and lawmakers were warned that they lacked staff and resources to take over control of 25 million acres of Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Reclamation property that fell within state boundaries.
“Ultimately, without significant changes to federal law, the greatest challenge would be that the state would be inheriting the same bureaucratic maze of overlapping, entwined, often conflicting federal mandates established in the labyrinth of laws and directives laid out by Congress,” the 2016 Y2 Consultants report stated. “The land management trials, conundrums, and conflicts encountered would largely be the same for the state that exist under present [federal] management.”
The first author listed on the report, a slot that typically denotes the lead, was Brenda Younkin, a natural resource specialist who co-founded Y2 Consultants with her husband, Zia Yasrobi.
On Wednesday, Politico’s E&E News publicized that Younkin had been appointed by the Trump administration and had started working in a senior advisor post at the Bureau of Land Management, where she’d report to its acting director, Jon Raby. Trump’s first pick to lead the BLM, Colorado oil and gas advocate Kathleen Sgamma, withdrew her bid after it was revealed that she’d written a memo expressing “disgust” for “President Trump’s role in spreading misinformation that incited” the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
WyoFile was unable to reach Younkin for an interview Friday, but an auto-response from her Y2 Consultants email address confirmed a “leave of absence” because of a new gig with the U.S. Department of the Interior, the BLM’s government parent.
According to her biography and past interviews, Younkin has worked in the public lands and ranching sphere her entire career.
In statements made to the Cowboy State Daily, U.S. Sens. Cynthia Lummis and John Barrasso both lauded Younkin’s appointment.
“The more Wyoming voices we can have in the room, the better off we will all be,” Barrasso told the outlet.
Younkin joins a handful of other Wyoming residents who’ve gone to work for the Trump administration’s Interior Department via political appointments, or who have been nominated for positions.
In early February, former Wyoming Game and Fish Department Director Brian Nesvik was nominated to direct the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, though four months later his appointment has still not cleared the Senate’s confirmation process. Cyrus Western, a former Republican statehouse representative, was picked to helm the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 8 office, based in Denver. Cheyenne attorney Karen Budd-Falen was also selected as the acting deputy secretary under Interior Secretary Doug Burgum.
Last, southwestern Wyoming big game hunting advocate Josh Coursey was appointed to a Fish and Wildlife Service post, pulling him away from the Muley Fanatic Foundation, which he co-founded. That group has since gone on record opposing a provision expected to be yoked into the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that would mandate the sale of an estimated 2-3 million acres of federal land in 11 western states.
“Public lands need to stay in public hands and the Muley Fanatic Foundation opposes anything or anyone that threatens our lands that we hold dear for personal use,” President and CEO Joey Faigle told WyoFile in a written statement. “The public land sales being included in the reconciliation needs to stop now.”
If the public land sale mandates don’t stop, the amount of land that Younkin, the Jackson Hole consultant, will be tasked with overseeing at the Bureau of Land Management will shrink.
The disposal language in the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources legislative text demands selling between 0.5% and 0.75% of the BLM and U.S. Forest Service’s 438 million surface acres within the next five years. Although just a fraction of the agencies’ overall holdings, it’d translate to doing away with public lands that collectively add up to an area no smaller than Yellowstone National Park.
From the 2016 Y2 report: “Management of federal public lands is an incredibly complex puzzle of interwoven and sometimes conflicting pieces. Numerous impediments from the straightforward to the extremely complicated make the prospect of such a state takeover of the management of federal public lands unlikely to succeed.”
And . . . Wyoming would be “inheriting the same bureaucratic maze of overlapping, entwined, often conflicting federal mandates established in the labyrinth of laws and directives laid out by Congress” and other rule-making bureaucracies.
Therefore, outright transfer (as promised), not simply “management,” is the only answer to the straits of gross federal mismanagement and non-management of our lands in which Wyoming finds itself . . . and the Y2 Report confirms it.
The states efforts to manage state land is the epitome of incompetence. They can’t even get it right with their own lands. Witness the mess they’ve created in the casper area. Some of the land board didn’t even know what they were voting for.
So what I learned from this is the state spent 75K on a report nearly 10 years ago that said the state can’t afford to manage all these lands and yet here they are again trying to get all that land in state hands. Which is an entirely different animal to just selling off public lands. Both are stupidly bad ideas, but nice to know that Wyoming is ignoring it’s 75k paid for advice….waste much?
This is a prime example of why Wyoming, and the country, doesn’t benefit from the political domination of one party. The immoral and weak spine of our ‘reps’ fits the old and true saying that “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. They are ignoring the voters and spinning the issue by saying that we the people don’t understand the big, wonderful bill. For you ‘reps’, we understand the issue and we’re telling you to keep your groveling hands off of our PUBLIC land.
While selling off or transferring our public lands is an important topic anytime and especially now (Keep it Public. Wyoming!), it would have been good for this article to discuss some of her other views. My guess is this is not the only thing she has opinions on and there are reasons the Administration has recruited her that would likely be of high interest to your readers.
The “big” bill is not about transferring ownership of federal lands to the state of Wyoming—it’s about allowing the sale of federal lands managed by the BLM and U.S. Forest Service. I agree with Y2 assessment that Wyoming does not have the resources to manage these lands if ownership were transferred. But more urgently, the sale of these public lands to private parties is hasty, shortsighted, and not in the public interest.
Federal government has always sold land off from time to time. So this isn’t anything new. Lot of land been sold off to states. The Land rush of Oklahoma is prime example of one way expansion was done.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that the state of Wyoming has no business taking over management of federal land resources. Period!
Remember that checker board land? Current landowners will now own all of it. The only people that will be able to afford all this beautiful, next to National Monuments and deep forests, is rich people. They get to decide who lives there. Mostly, themselves. Build a mansion, tax write off for business, and privacy. How many mansions have the federal government funded for the wealthy? This doesn’t make room for the affordable housing. It’s just another scam.