Longtime oil and gas industry advocate and vocal critic of federal oversight Kathleen Sgamma is President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, an agency that oversees some 18.4 million surface acres and 42.9 million acres of mineral estate in Wyoming.

With management authorities that affect agriculture, wildlife habitat, recreation, oil and gas development, commercial-scale renewable energy and the world’s largest coal producing region in the Powder River Basin, the federal agency plays a pivotal role in Wyoming’s economy.

Sgamma is president of the Denver, Colorado-based Western Energy Alliance, a powerful oil and gas trade group that advocates for the industry’s access to public lands — like those managed by the agency she’s now slated to run. The group is often at odds with federal agencies, particularly the BLM, over federal rules and regulations. Sgamma and the Western Energy Alliance are well known throughout the West, and her nomination has garnered cheers from fossil fuel industry leaders and jeers from many in conservation.

The Oregon Buttes Wilderness Study Area in June 2014. (Sam Cox/BLM-Wyoming Flickr)

Gov. Mark Gordon described Trump’s nomination of Sgamma as “an excellent choice…to lead the Bureau of Land Management.

“As someone who has worked with Ms. Sgamma,” Gordon continued in a prepared statement, “I know she is well-qualified and knowledgeable when it comes to Wyoming, the West, and multiple use of public lands.” 

Public lands advocacy group Center for Western Priorities, however, regards the nomination as “inappropriate” and “a direct threat to Western communities and wildlife that depend on healthy landscapes, clean air, and clean water.” 

Sgamma “has consistently misrepresented the industry’s impact on public lands, always putting oil and gas companies’ interests above those of all Americans,” Center for Western Priorities Policy Director Rachael Hamby said in a prepared statement. “This appointment will hand the keys to our public lands over to oil and gas companies.”

The group recently published a report, “Don’t Drill Here,” detailing what it sees as a persistent push by the oil and gas industry to expand development into areas of public lands with “high recreational, ecological and cultural” values that are not conducive to drilling.

“Kathleen, she is very smart and she knows the BLM inside and out — how it works, how it doesn’t work, and what needs to be done to make sure that public lands and energy development can continue.”

Pete Obermueller, Petroleum Association of Wyoming

“Reducing conflicts while still allowing oil and gas companies the opportunity to drill in appropriate areas should be the goal of the Bureau of Land Management, not enriching oil and gas CEOs at the expense of rural communities and national parks,” Center for Western Priorities Communications Manager Kate Groetzinger said in a prepared statement this week.

BLM in Wyoming

With a vast footprint in Wyoming, BLM lands support a multitude of uses that, combined, generate billions of dollars and more than 70,000 jobs in the state, according to the agency. But its ever-evolving rules and regulations — rooted in the multiple-use doctrine of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act — often confound public land stakeholders.

The state of Wyoming, for example, is involved in multiple lawsuits regarding BLM policies — some supporting the agency’s positions, such as the 5,000-well Converse County Oil and Gas Project, and many more against: the BLM’s ‘conservation rule,’ the agency’s rule to end federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin and the sage grouse management amendments.

An oil and gas drilling rig in Wyoming BLM’s High Desert District. (Wyoming BLM/FlickrCC)

Gordon is reviewing the BLM’s controversial Rock Springs Resource Management Plan revisions prescribing the future management of 3.6 million acres of southwest Wyoming, and is considering suing the agency over it. Earlier this month, new Interior Secretary Doug Burgum directed Wyoming’s BLM office to review the plan and recommend changes by Feb. 18.

Western Energy Alliance is one of the BLM’s most frequent challengers in court and has long sought to overturn several of the agency’s rules implemented under the Biden administration.

“Honored to be nominated by @realDonaldTrump to serve as Director of BLM to help unleash American energy,” Sgamma posted on the X social media platform on Wednesday. “I’ve worked on public lands issues for 20 years at @WesternEnergy1 & greatly respect the work BLM does balancing multiple uses [with] stewardship.”

Reached by WyoFile, Sgamma said, via email, she could not talk about her nomination.

Oil and gas advocates in Wyoming are optimistic about a new direction at the BLM, if Sgamma’s nomination is confirmed.

“Kathleen, she is very smart and she knows the BLM inside and out — how it works, how it doesn’t work, and what needs to be done to make sure that public lands and energy development can continue,” Petroleum Association of Wyoming President Pete Obermueller told WyoFile.

Many conservation groups, however, doubt Sgamma’s commitment to managing BLM lands for all stakeholders, if she is confirmed by the Senate.

“Given the Trump Administration’s executive and secretarial orders on energy, we are concerned with the new direction of the Department of Interior, which will prioritize oil and gas drilling above all other uses on our public lands,” Wyoming Outdoor Council Program Director Alec Underwood told WyoFile via email. “We are disappointed, but not surprised, that President Trump would choose an extractive industry representative to oversee nearly 250 million acres of public lands across the nation, including over 18 million acres here in Wyoming.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *