As people from Wyoming and beyond join in righteous indignation over an ugly incident in which a man tortured and killed an animal simply because it was a wolf, we would do well to examine the policy framework that set the stage for tragedy. As in all tragedies, the result is not just the downfall of the main character. The story has layers of irony — not situational irony, which would be a surprise, but tragic, dramatic irony with an air of inevitability, not fully recognized by the participants but strongly sensed by the audience.
Opinion
One man has become the public face of Wyoming by torturing an animal — running down a wolf on a snowmobile, taping its mouth shut, dragging it to town broken yet alive, showing it off at the Green River Bar, and then finally killing it. In doing so, he confirmed stereotypes many Americans have about hunters, rural Americans and the Cowboy State.
The irony isn’t just that an ethically challenged hunter undermined the social license of all hunters while bringing the treatment of wolves to national attention just as non-governmental organizations are suing, again, over the status of wolves in the Northern Rockies. It’s also that those who hate wolves regularly tout the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, a set of principles that guides hunting policy based on the idea that wildlife is held in public trust, to be scientifically managed, and only killed for valid reasons. Yet, the treatment of animals legally classified as predatory is hardly consistent with the model.
I last stopped at the Green River Bar, the oldest building in Daniel, my kind of place — heretofore known for its slaw dawg — while paddling the Green River from its headwaters in the Wind River Range, across western Wyoming to Utah and Colorado. I was investigating possible corridors from the Northern to the Central and Southern Rockies, routes by which animals like wolves, wolverines or perhaps grizzlies might reoccupy habitats to the south. The conclusion was clear: Absent persecution by people, it could happen, but Wyoming’s policies are a thinly veiled attempt to restrict large carnivores to the mostly federal lands of Greater Yellowstone. In the Predatory Animal Management Area or “predator zone,” wolves can be shot on sight, year-round, for no reason.
The people I’ve worked with in Wyoming are almost all conservationists; many of them are also hunters and ranchers. Most of those folks don’t kill wolves except to reduce livestock conflicts, and most of them wouldn’t condone the events that culminated at the “GRB.”

Nevertheless, a series of policies set the stage. Apparently, there is nothing illegal about running an animal down with a snowmobile, provided that animal is classified as a predator. That happens more than most of us would like to admit, and not just in Wyoming. But perhaps most of all, that stage is the predator zone — which has prevented nationwide recovery, and, ironically, federal delisting.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will finally develop a nationwide recovery plan for the gray wolf across its historic range, likely identifying suitable habitat throughout the Rockies. Had such a plan been in place a decade ago, it seems unlikely that Wyoming’s state plan would have been approved. Or perhaps wolves would have been delisted where they are abundant (Greater Yellowstone), but not where they remain rare (the predator zone).
In any case, nothing was stopping Wyoming from setting policy in what is now the predator zone. A new federal listing may force the state to remove or redraw the predator zone.
I submit that an adequate regulatory mechanism would take a live-and-let-live approach, incentivize conflict reduction, and retain lethal control as a backstop to address repeated conflicts. The recent outrage suggests that many Americans would agree that such a policy is needed.

Gov. Mark Gordon, Game and Fish Director Brian Nesvik, Wyoming Speaker of the House Albert Sommers and Sublette County Sheriff K.C. Lehr have condemned the recent incident. I’d prefer that they had done so before the story went viral, but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt considering the legal state secrecy around wolf killings. Now, I’d like to see Sublette County’s lawmakers and candidates lead the state Legislature to revise animal cruelty laws to cover all wildlife.
Wyoming, a state known for its live-and-let-live mentality, could at least pass laws to protect a wild animal’s right to die with dignity and not be run down by a snowmobile and suffer in a bar. And to the species that so reminds us of ourselves, on to which we project so much human meaning, the Equality State could extend the right not to be killed simply for being a wolf.


Leave these poor animals alone , they deserve every right to live out their lives peacefully and naturally.
Despicable people who call themselves humans should be put away for life !!
I’m sure he’d have a better view on issues than a single-
minded person.
Excellent comment that captures the furious indignation and frenzied mood of the many people that have learned of this insidious and shocking form of animal abuse. This torturing of a wolf has provoked worldwide outrage. It is common refrain amongst Westerner and country folk that outsiders should mind their own business. It must be understood that 48-percent of Wyoming consists of federal lands. Not only because of the amount of Fe et Al land but in these United States we all have a right to our opinion. When I was in Montana, I was told that the 3S rule applied to wolves. This occurred while they were listed on the ESA. In conservative state, willful individuals will decide which rules apply and which rules don’t. Sorry, it does not work that way in a civilized, democratic society. As a public land owner, I demand humane and ethical treatment of predators, especially as an American citizen. In these Unitsd States, I have a right condemn barbaric treatment of animal. This is not about hunting. As a lifelong hunter, Inam outraged. In fact, I have 2 preference points to hunt elk in Wyoming and unless something changes, you will not see another penny of my money. I will not subsidize cruelty in any form. In the East we do not annihilate sharks because they eat high-value fish. We have seasons and now most sharks are protected from willful slaughter. If we can coexist with sharks that are far more fearsome than wolves,
then Wyoming can actually become then gold standard of wildlife management as you proclaim. Common sense rules are needed and the historic demonization of wolves needs to cease. Shame on Wyoming. Failure to change your policy toward wolves and all predators will show that this incident does indeed represent the inherent culture and the mindset of Wyoming.
Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU!
I think that like everything in today’s world everyone caves to MOB LAW! The common man is not heard, just the MOB. People that don’t seek the truth but only emotion get heard their way. The man paid his fine this should have taken care of the problem! Then some greedy news media had to want to make a name for himself and got the MOB involved, I hope this can be solved with the use of good judgment and common sense!
It’s ok to protect livestock. It’s ok to have to shoot a predator. It is not ok to torture an animal for your amusement and pleasure
Sorry, I disagree. We don’t protect “livestock,” we keep them alive only to slaughter them for pleasure, for profit–but they suffer and die in earnest. We persecute predators because we don’t like the competition and, unlike predators who kill only for survival, we mock the rules of predation.
I have read the article and believe there is no excuse for torturing or arbitrarily killing an animal. It makes me very sad that any human being could do such hateful things.
Your point about the contradiction between the widely heralded “North American Model of Wildlife Conservation” and the policies concerning wolves (and other predators) is excellent. The Wyoming-Idaho policies constitute a “Model of Predator Extinction”—extinction being held off only by the Endangered Species Act
ok barnes since your appointed to office,but have all the answers,
why not run for office ?
running for office & winning you can set policy for wildlife !
i guess running for office as a democrat in wyoming,is a loosing proposition,
why not change your party affilition !
I’m sure he’d have a better view on issues than a single-minded person.
Wyoming might be known for its “live and let live mentality” but I don’t know it to be true. It certainly isn’t now.
There is no reason, none, to hunt wolves. The hatred some people have towards wolves is puzzling given the love Americans have for their relatives, domestic canines, our beloved dogs. There are several ways to protect cattle, sheep and other livestock from wolves and other predators. Why, is killing always the first thing someone thinks of? It’s lazy, thoughtless and totally unnecessary. I hope Wyoming law is changed, and soon.
This may be an opportune time to re-examine the taxpayer funded USDA/APHIS predator control programs, specifically aerial gunning of coyotes and other species. This is a practice which is neither sporting nor ethical. I have no problem with ground based hunting of problem animals on private property or state lands, but it should be locally funded, without the use of federal dollars. Livestock losses should be considered a cost of doing business, and paying for those losses should not be another sweetheart subsidy to agribusiness. Wyoming is the 2nd most “free state” in the country, next to neighboring South Dakota. If people don’t like living with wildlife, they are free to move to Cheyenne.
Phil: Wyoming District Court in Washakie county ruled that the State is responsible for livestock losses which the publicly owned predators do to private property. The court’s analogy was that the state’s ownership of predators is similar to my ownership of a dog, and if my dog gets loose and kills the neighbors chickens – I have to pay the damage. Since the ruling, Wyoming Game and Fish has been compensating ranchers for livestock losses ; however, the compensation funds are derived from the sale of hunting and fishing licenses and no general fund monies are expended. Please note, that in cases of grizzly bear predation on livestock, the taxpayers of the US and/or Wyoming are not paying for predator compensation payments. And, Wyoming has spent over $70 million on grizzly bear recovery – NOT THE GENERAL POPULATION OF THE US. Out-of-state residents love to get involved in wolf and grizzly bear issues but they are not paying for the cost of recovery and management of these apex predators – as mentioned before, the sale of hunting and fishing licenses has incurred those expenses. Wyoming should be reimbursed in full for the monies we spent recovering wolves and grizzlies.
Aerial hunting of coyotes and now wolves, has long been funded by the legislature via funds appropriated to the Wyoming Department of Agriculture which then gives money to the local predator control boards that also receive money from ranchers – coyotes in particular are not managed by Game and Fish – instead, they are under Dept. of Ag jurisdiction. USDA/APHIS funds of course are appropriated by Congress under the Federal predator control program. In addition, to State and Federal funded predator control programs, individual ranchers routinely fly coyote control especially in sheep ranching areas – sheep ranching would be impossible in Wyoming without coyote control. Predator control in Wyoming – in order to protect the livestock industry – is a major issue and enjoys almost unanimous support in the legislature – don’t look for the legislature/State of Wyoming to change predator control provisions in the near future – they may tweak it a bit – such as outlawing snow mobiles – but the rest will remain largely unchanged.
In 1949, Aldo Leopold, considered the father of conservation in the United States, wrote an essay titled “Thinking Like a Mountain” in his renown classic “A Sand County Almanac.” In this essay he recounts the shooting of a wolf while working for the U.S. Forest Service. When Leopold approached the wolf it was still alive and he watched the light of life die out in the animals eyes. He realized that this approach to wildlife, especially predator management was wrong. I encourage everyone to read this short piece. We all need to heed Mr. Leopold’s advice and learn to think like a mountain.
“We reached the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes. I realized then, and have known ever since, that there was something new to me in those eyes – something known only to her and to the mountain. I was young then, and full of trigger-itch; I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters’ paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view.
Since then I have lived to see state after state extirpate its wolves. I have watched the face of many a newly wolfless mountain, and seen the south-facing slopes wrinkle with a maze of new deer trails. I have seen every edible bush and seedling browsed, first to anemic desuetude, and then to death. I have seen every edible tree defoliated to the height of a saddlehorn … In the end the starved bones of the hoped-for deer herd, dead of its own too-much, bleach with the bones of the dead sage, or molder under the high-lined junipers … So also with cows. The cowman who cleans his range of wolves does not realize that he is taking over the wolf’s job of trimming the herd to fit the change. He has not learned to think like a mountain. Hence we have dustbowls, and rivers washing the future into the sea.”
-Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac
Brilliant call for us all.. thank you Shawn