WyoFile Energy Report

Wyoming 2012 coal production slides

Wyoming’s annual coal production may have slipped below 400 million tons for the first time in seven years.

According to U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data, Wyoming was on track to produce approximately 398 million tons in 2012, which would represent a 9 percent slide from 2011 production. (Final production figures for 2012 will be available in a few weeks.)

Dustin Bleizeffer

It’s a serious economic and psychological thumping in a state that had set a new coal production record every year for nearly 20 years. Coal is the second largest source of revenue in Wyoming and contributed $1.13 billion to state and local governments in 2011, according to the Wyoming Mining Association.

The biggest factor behind declining U.S. coal demand is the cheap, flush supply of new domestic natural gas — an obvious alternative for utilities. Particularly public utilities that are required to justify their fuel costs. Plentiful and cheap natural gas — along with an onslaught of tougher federal regulations from the mining stages to the smokestack — are the reasons why coal has gone from supplying 51 percent of America’s base-load electrical capacity to just 43 percent in a matter of seven years, according to EIA.

If declining U.S. demand for coal the new normal, it could spell trouble for Wyoming. There is panic among Wyoming’s top elected officials, and in Campbell County. And you might expect there is panic among Wyoming coal producers. You might expect that declining demand in their core market — U.S. utilities — is nudging the coal industry toward the negotiating table for an American energy and climate policy.

But you would be wrong.

Check back later for full analysis on why Powder River Basin producers aren’t exactly sweating the decline — yet.

— Dustin Bleizeffer is WyoFile editor-in-chief. Reach him at 307-577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com. Follow Dustin on Twitter @DBleizeffer.

If you enjoyed this report and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS REPORT: For details on how you can republish this report or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *