Biologists, wardens and volunteers who monitor sage grouse documented fewer males strutting this spring at their Wyoming leks. That cyclical downturn indicates that population highs keep falling for a sagebrush-dependent species that continues to fare poorly in its largest stronghold.

The 2026 decrease at leks — where birds gather to display and attract mates in the spring — was expected: Wyoming’s population cycles every nine years or so, and those swings are natural and part of basic sage grouse biology. More significantly, the slump downward signals that the statewide population topped out in 2025 at a level that was 26% below its 2006 peak and 15% below its 2016 peak. The trend line for these cycles points noticeably downward, and since the turn of the century the average number of male sage grouse gathered at active Wyoming leks has fallen from 29 to 23 birds, a roughly 20% drop. 

“The reality is, there’s fewer average number of males per active lek at each of the [cycle] peaks,” said Nyssa Whitford, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s sage grouse and sagebrush biologist. 

What exactly to make of the numbers is up for debate among experts. Some metrics — like lek counts during troughs in the cycle — look better for Wyoming sage grouse.

The average number of male sage grouse gathered at active Wyoming leks has fallen from 29 to 23 birds, a roughly 20% drop, since the turn of the century. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

Yet other metrics signal sage grouse population declines over the last quarter century. Game and Fish tracks the “peak males” known to exist — it’s a measure of the highest number of males observed at all leks biologists surveyed, even if grouse counters made only a single visit. (Not all leks are visited, but the agency’s goal is to get to 90% of them annually.)

“This [declining] trend also holds true for peak males,” Whitford said. “There are fewer peak males on the landscape.” 

When the population cycle topped out in 2006, there were over 44,000 “peak males” observed statewide, according to Game and Fish data. The measure only slightly fell to 43,329 peak males by the high point of the next cycle in 2016. But surveys clocked a sharp drop in peak males observed during the 2025 high point with 31,123 birds observed, marking a 29% decline since 2006. 

Active leks where sage grouse display have slowly and steadily decreased during the first quarter of the 21st century. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

And the proportion of “active leks” — where at least one strutting male was seen — also continued to slide. The percentage of active leks hit 90.8% during the 2006 peak but fell to 82% in 2016 and 80.1% during the most recent peak in 2025. 

It’s no secret that sage grouse, which depend on the steadily degrading sagebrush ecosystem, are in a long-term decline across their range spanning 10 western states — they were recently extirpated from North Dakota. A 2021 U.S. Geological Survey report estimated an 81% decline in the species over the preceding 53 years. Wyoming remains a stronghold — home to nearly 40% of the estimated 200,000 to 500,000 birds still on the range. 

Short-term snapshot

During their spring surveys, lek count crews detected an average of 13% fewer sage grouse statewide compared to 2025. Wyoming used to divide its population into areas monitored by eight regional conservation groups, but Game and Fish dissolved those groups early this year. Now the state agency calls the regions “management areas,” Whitford said. Lek counts fell in all eight of them. 

Compared to 2025, the average number of male grouse decreased by 25% in southwest Wyoming, 13% in the Snake River Basin and 12% each in the Bighorn Basin, southcentral Wyoming and the Wind River Basin. Birds fared slightly better in northeast Wyoming (8% decline), Bates Hole/Shirley Basin (7% decline) and the Upper Green River Basin (5% decline).

(Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

Northeast Wyoming, including the Powder River Basin, is the only area where sage grouse lek counts fell in 2025, too. Besides Jackson Hole’s tiny, isolated grouse population, that northeastern region is home to the smallest and most vulnerable groups of birds in Wyoming. Population cycles run slightly differently there, Whitford said, averaging closer to seven years peak to peak. 

Habitat loss from the nearly 180,000-acre House Draw Fire east of the Bighorns in Johnson County hasn’t helped their cause. The first year after the 2024 wildfire converted vast tracts of sagebrush to grassland, counts of strutting males at 20 known leks within the fire scar fell by 40%. The decline continued.

“In 2024, there were 136 peak males within the fire perimeter,” Whitford said of surveys before the area burned. “There were 29 peak males observed this year in the fire scar.” 

The 2025 House Draw Fire, pictured, reduced the number of active sage grouse leks from eight to three within the wildfire’s 180,000-acre footprint southeast of Buffalo. (Chris Kirol)

That’s a 79% decrease, explained by what appears to be the abandonment of lek sites where the sagebrush was scorched. The number of active leks fell from eight to three between 2025 and 2026, Whitford said. 

“The leks that are still active are closer to the edge,” she said. “We do see this lag effect with fires. The first year, the birds are really trying. Then the second year, I think they’re like, ‘No thank you.’” 

Sage grouse fared very differently in the Red Canyon Fire scar their first year dealing with habitat loss. That 2025 blaze in the Bighorn Basin burned in a mosaic-like pattern, and birds seem to be holding on better. There were eight active sage grouse leks in the Red Canyon Fire scar this spring, Whitford said, which is the same number as before the wildfire. Average lek counts have also held steady at 13 birds. 

“We’re really just not seeing much of an effect,” Whitford said.  

Deeper into the data

Retired Game and Fish sage grouse coordinator Tom Christiansen told WyoFile it’s important to note that long-term changes in Wyoming sage grouse metrics depend on the period being examined. 

“The key thing in all of these trendlines is when they start and when they end,” Christiansen said. “If you went back to 1995, the line would be flatter.”

For Christiansen, sage grouse population low points are more important than when the cycles are peaking. 

“You have to look at the valleys,” he said. “There’s no doubt that numbers of grouse over the long-term have gone down. The question is, have they gone down in the last 30 years?”

Wyoming Sage Grouse coordinator Tom Christiansen, who’s since retired, surveys leks in 2015. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr. / WyoFile)

The lowest sage grouse counts since the start of modern recordkeeping came in 1996, when there were an average of 12.5 males per active lek. The most recent 2013 and 2021 population troughs did not get this low, although they still slumped to 16.8, low enough for a former Game and Fish biologist to call the data “alarming.” 

Other sage grouse biologists don’t put a ton of weight into the average-males-per-active-lek measure that Wyoming uses to track its population. That metric “obscures the reality” and is “biased in both directions,” said Tom Remington, a former director of the Colorado Division of Wildlife.

“As populations increase, new leks form and by definition are small and so it tends to bring the average down of males per lek,” Remington said. “And as populations bottom, you’re left with the biggest leks. A lot of those peripheral leks that are transient go away, so those small numbers get taken out of the equation.” 

A greater sage grouse hen with her brood. (Tom Koerner/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

Remington’s take is that the total number of strutting grouse observed — the “peak males” metric — is the more important gauge of populations. By that measure, Wyoming sage grouse numbers have been more stable since the turn of the century.

There were 15,499 peak males observed during the 2002 trough, 18,274 observed during the 2013 trough and 16,316 counted during the most recent 2021 trough. 

There are likely a few years to go before Wyoming sage grouse numbers bottom out again. Based on the average nine-year cycle, the next nadir won’t come until 2029 or 2030. 

With vegetation sparse and parched from the warmest winter and sparsest spring snowpack on record, conditions aren’t looking especially good for sage grouse. 

“We have entered the downward portion of the cycle, and [the drought] is not going to help arrest that trend,” Whitford said. “The habitat is key.” 

Christiansen, who still helps with sage grouse lek counts in the Golden Triangle, home to the largest lek on the planet, echoed the observation. 

“They didn’t look good to me,” he said of conditions on the range. 

Wyoming wildlife managers will get a sense of how sage grouse chicks fared this year come the fall hunting season, which runs from Sept. 19-30. Hunters can help biologists determine the ratio of chicks to hens — a key measure of population productivity — by dropping wings in barrels distributed around sagebrush country.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Once again, it needs to be pointed out that a major issue with the sage grouse decline is the massive overgrazing that occurs on our public lands. How many times does this need to be shouted out until agencies like the blm, forest service and game & fish take action? Cheatgrass thrives in over grazed environments and is followed by fire. the watering holes and streams get pounded down to mud and cow droppings everywhere.The public has been crying out for years It’s no secret that the minions of these agencies are scared to death of the welfare public land ranchers but would someone PLEASE grow a set before the grouse decline is irreversible? How about YOU, Nyssa Whitford (game & fish)?