Landing a Land Transaction

A Wyoming congressional representative is trying to resurrect a federal land sale act to reduce the budget deficit and help the National Park Service end a long quest to capture a Grand Teton inholding.

The Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act (pronounced “flit-fah”) was enacted in July 2000 to allow federal agencies to sell off disposable lands identified prior to the bill and stash most of the profits for land purchases to preserve important cultural, wildlife or protected sites. (High Country News writer Zachary Smith wrote about the Bureau of Land Management’s interest in upping land transactions under the Act in 2004.)

Kimberly Hirai

The Act expired in 2010, but Congress resurrected it last July for an additional year through an emergency appropriations bill. It died a second time this summer. Flit-fah is now flitting its way back into Congress. Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., introduced a bill Nov. 4 to bring the act back. Lummis wants it to help close a lagging land sale from the State of Wyoming to the Department of Interior. The sale includes some 1,400 acres worth $107 million in Grand Teton National Park.  Money from land sales could be used toward the cost of that inholding.

“We have 33,000 federal buildings in this country that are not being used. We have tens of thousands — hundreds of thousands — of acres, federal land, BLM land that is on their disposal list,” Lummis said.

Negotiations between the Interior Department and the state over the Grand Teton property have limped on for years. The State of Wyoming is eager to sell—it only reaps $2,000-3,000 per year off the land from cattle grazing. Last year, former Gov. Dave Freudenthal gave the National Park Service an ultimatum meant to push the deal through, threatening to put the land up for sale if the federal government did not negotiate a trade that would give the state mineral rights, other land, or education money (some of the inholding lands are state school trust lands intended to generate funds for public education).  The two parties finally agreed that the Department of Interior would buy the parcels in a series of four purchases starting January 5, 2012.

Lummis says the act is a good alternative to Congress-dependent initiatives like the Land and Water Conservation Fund, the proposed method of payment for the Grand Teton transaction. The fund received a little more than $301 million for the 2011 fiscal year — a 33 percent cut from 2010 funding levels.

“In this financial environment, we have to expedite the conversion of surplus federal property to cash because we can’t appropriate it from taxpayer dollars. We’re broke,” Lummis said. The bill would reauthorize the land transaction act until 2018 and take another look at an inventory of properties eligible for sale.

The act seems to work— since 2000, the Bureau of Land Management has sold off 27,000 acres (mostly from Nevada bureau land transactions), generating a profit that paid for $94 million in land acquisitions for the BLM, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Forest Service.

And Lummis’ plan shows promise. Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., introduced a similar bill that was later put on the Senate calendar. Lummis’ bill has also garnered support from the Sierra Club, The Conservation Fund and Wyoming Outdoor Council among others. It was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.  Not surprisingly, although Lummis claims bipartisan support for her bill, “some in Congress, particularly Republicans, have shown a hesitance to appropriate scarce federal dollars to buy new lands,” according to Environment and Energy Daily.

Kimberly Hirai is an intern at High Country News.

(Banner photo by Frank Kovalchek/Flickr)

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *