The Trump administration today declared the United States will no longer limit greenhouse gas emissions, striking down the landmark 2009 “endangerment finding” doctrine that legally obliged federal agencies to regulate vehicle and industrial releases of planet-warming gases.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the move today, saying it is the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”

“The endangerment finding has been the source of 16 years of consumer choice restrictions and trillions of dollars in hidden costs for Americans,” Zeldin said in a prepared statement. “Referred to by some as the ‘Holy Grail’ of the ‘climate change religion,’ the endangerment finding is now eliminated.”

Zeldin also took to social media to declare, “President Trump has ENDED the ‘Green New Scam.'”

While the EPA’s announcement focused on removing federal vehicle emission standards, the agency alluded to how eliminating the endangerment finding sets the stage to eliminate all federal greenhouse gas regulations, including climate policies imposed by the Obama and Biden administrations.

Water vapor and pollutants rise from stacks at PacifiCorp’s Jim Bridger coal-fired power plant near Point of Rocks in southwest Wyoming on Jan. 19, 2022. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Essentially, removing the endangerment finding revokes the federal government’s legal foundation to regulate climate pollution. Not only does it erase vehicle tailpipe standards, but it also applies to coal smokestacks and other industrial emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other planet-warming gases.

The Sierra Club, among others, promised to challenge the action in court.

“We refuse to let this dangerous decision go,” the organization said in a prepared statement. “Climate change is already upending millions of lives, and now the EPA and President Trump are telling us to ignore the reality we are all seeing with our own eyes so that big polluting industries can get richer.”

Signs posted at the inaugural Wyoming Climate Summit on June 25, 2022, at the Lander Community and Convention Center. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

The past 11 years have been the hottest on record, according to the World Meteorological Organization — which is not lost on Wyomingites. 

The vast majority of residents — 86% — “believe that climate change is happening,” according to last year’s Wyoming Survey on Climate, Water, and People. The primary concern in the notoriously arid state, according to the survey, is what it means for the future availability of water.

Wyoming’s congressional delegation was quick to applaud the EPA’s action.

“The endangerment finding was based on political expediency — not scientific standards,” Sen. John Barrasso posted on social media. “The Biden and Obama administrations routinely abused this finding as an excuse to roll out red tape that destroyed jobs across America.”

“I’m thrilled [Trump and Zeldin] are rescinding the imbecilic Obama-era rule used to expand federal overreach,” Sen. Cynthia Lummis posted on social media. “It never received proper congressional debate or approval, yet fueled a decades-long campaign against our fossil fuel industry in the name of climate change.”

Gov. Mark Gordon, who in September acknowledged that the Trump administration’s rollback on coal emission regulations would result in “more CO2 production,” said he welcomed the EPA’s move because Wyoming’s fossil fuel industry was under constant “attack” from the Obama and Biden administrations.

“The prime weapon of choice was the EPA endangerment finding, which was used as a basis for many of those attacks,” Gordon said in a statement Thursday. “The long-awaited and much needed disposal of this blatant power grab is a welcome development. 

“The unreasonable federal regulations, which were based on this finding and detrimental to the fossil fuel industry,” Gordon continued,  “will no longer be used to harm Wyoming’s industries and the communities that rely on them.”

Trump also signed an executive order Wednesday, directing the Pentagon to strike contracts with coal-based power utilities to power military bases. 

Trains loaded with Powder River Basin coal, pictured in 2006, at Union Pacific’s Bailey railyard in North Platte, Neb. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“Coal generation ensures that military installations, command centers and defense-industrial bases remain fully powered under all conditions — including natural disasters, or wartime contingencies,” the order states. “Maintaining this capability is a matter of national security, strategic deterrence and American energy dominance.”

Rep. Harriet Hageman this week said she’s crafting a bill to block climate-based lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, saying they could “destroy energy affordability for consumers.” 

Hageman received boos at a town hall meeting last year in Pinedale when she proclaimed, “The endangerment finding is absolutely based upon false science.” The community has struggled with air quality over the past 20 years, beginning with a massive natural gas development that coincided with alarming ozone levels.

Wyoming, as the nation’s largest coal producer, has much at stake. The coal industry’s dramatic 15-year decline has cut Wyoming production by nearly half as utilities retired and dialed back electrical generation at aging power plants, shifted to natural gas-fired electric generation and increasingly used price-competitive wind and solar energy. 

​​The last two coal-burning units at the Naughton power plant near Kemmerer went dark in January, allowing crews to retool them to burn natural gas instead. The power plant’s majority owner and operator, Rocky Mountain Power, determined that a $12.1 million expenditure to convert the two remaining coal units “was the least-cost, least-risk option for the company and its customers.”

Reached by phone Thursday afternoon, EPA Region 8 Administrator and former Sheridan County lawmaker Cyrus Western reiterated that the agency’s action this week directly addresses nonpoint sources like vehicle tailpipes. Zeldin, he said, is working on reformations to the Clean Power Plan that will come this spring.

Former Republican House District 51 Representative Cyrus Western pictured at the Wyoming Capitol during the 2022 legislative session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The Obama and Biden administrations, Western insisted, wrongfully pointed to the endangerment finding to enact climate policies that were not prescribed by Congress. Coal companies and all businesses, he said, can be assured that EPA will no longer act beyond the direction of Congress.

“[Zeldin] and the president squarely believe that if agencies are going to engage in some regulatory action, they need to be explicitly instructed to do so by Congress,” said Western. “If Congress wants us to regulate these things, they need to go through the formal process, pass the bill, have it signed by the President, and then we will react and regulate accordingly.”

Asked whether he is concerned about climate change and climate ramifications of EPA’s action, Western instead talked about other pollutants. 

“This doesn’t automatically mean that the air is going to be dirtier. That is absolutely not the case,” Western said. The EPA will continue to enforce Clean Air Act regulations for pollutants such as particulate matter, metals and ozone, he said. “For all those things, we are absolutely still enforcing them to ensure that Americans can have the clean air they deserve.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. So according to President Trump, climate change is a “con” Maybe, possibly not. I’m just an ordinary citizen, no scientific background, but I do know this…….I saw the pictures of California smog during the Covid 19 shutdown, the before and during. That, combined with the haze that seems to perpetually be present in our atmosphere has lead me to believe that we need to be mindful of what humans are contributing to the air that we breathe.

  2. The climate has been in a constant state of change for the past 4.5-billion years. The length of time that weather has been dutifully recorded in the USA is not even a fly speck in geologic time scales. A couple of hundred years of weather records is just that, snapshots of a brief period in earth’s history.

    The last ice-age ended about 15,000-years ago or so, and the climate was far worse then. It’s unlikely primitive humans caused, let alone contributed to the global cooling during that period of time.

    Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lumborg were part of the ‘climate grift’ in their younger days; but they gained wisdom from life and realized the scam for what it was. They argue for rational thinking, and not basing policies on fear mongering by those that stand to profit.

    Regardless of what you think of Trump; his administration realizes that over-regulation has made America, and the rest of the Western World noncompetitive in the global economy. Getting rid of the Obama-Biden red-tape is a good thing, and Europe should take note.

    1. It’s not about temperature change. It’s about the rate of change and man has definitely increased the speed of temperature change. When dumpy is gone common sense will prevail.

  3. Not sure how anyone in this country does not want cleaner air and water. This will hurt America, result is loss of habitat for wildlife, etc. This is not good.

  4. We’ve had “dire climate warnings” going back to my childhood in the 1970s when I remember we were told the next Ice Age was coming. Then told in the 90s Global warming was going to melt the ice caps and raise sea levels over Miami and the rest of the coastal areas of the plant .

    The climate ALWAYS changes, and obviously man has no clue on predicting it.

      1. Gordon, there’s no way to prove man has sped up or slowed down “climate change”.
        It “changes” regardless of man.

  5. Are these money worshipers blind? We’ve just had a month in Cody with barely a frost and day temps in the 50s. Every winter in the future won’t be like this, but the trends are undeniable. They think that controlling greenhouse gases is expensive, Think about the real costs of climate change. Loss of irrigation and municiple water, reduction of native range production, vastly increased fire seasons, lowering property values. I’ve lived in Cody 50 years and have seen massive changes. What will our grandchildren see in another 50?? Do MAGA people even care?

    1. Unfortunately, in response to your last question regarding MAGA, I’d say these people have shown their true colors again and again and the answer is a definitive NO. All that seems to matter to them is that they retain power by any means necessary. Great American patriots one and all….

      I’ve tried again and again to understand what their end game might be as they continue ripping everthing apart from health care, the environment, the economy, world order, etc, etc, and it makes no logical sense. It appears that their goal is to return this planet to the stone age not Trump’s promised “golden” one.