I am a U.S. Navy veteran who served as a hospital corpsman during the Vietnam War. At that time, enlisted women were not allowed to serve overseas, so I served in one of the many evacuation centers for war casualties stateside. Helping those young men deal with their injuries — physical and mental — taught me to appreciate the horrors of war. Working the night shift, I spent many hours listening to an endless stream of patients who would come and sit with me and share their nightmares that would not allow them to close their eyes and sleep. I sat and held the hands (or stumps) of kids so maimed by war that they could not leave their beds. I hand-fed soldiers who no longer had hands with which to eat, all the while keeping a brave face, yet inwardly mourning the fate of these guys. We were all so young. 

Opinion

There is still no answer to why we were involved in that war, and yet here we are again, entering another war. What is the Iran war about, and when will we know it’s done? The administration has provided no rationale for this war. They have offered at least 10 different reasons in the past week and have not presented any clear goal — rather they have cited multiple goals and seem to choose from among them almost randomly. 

On March 1, an Iranian drone hit an operations center in Kuwait, and six American service members lost their lives. Not only was this event a tragedy — it requires an explanation. The drone apparently snuck through American defenses without setting off any alerts and struck a target that seems to be unduly vulnerable to such an attack. 

In the wake of this attack, I watched the press conference with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. I was curious to hear his message of condolence to the families of the deceased and to evaluate how his method of expressing grief and remorse at the loss of these American lives measured up against that of previous secretaries when they delivered such news. 

I was mortified by the way Hegseth handled this press conference. The defense secretary — the man who is supposed to carry this news to the American public and mourn with them — instead whined about the unfairness of it all. As he put it: “When a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it’s front-page news.” He complained that the press was covering the deaths because the press “only wants to make the president look bad.” Hegseth said this as though it is unreasonable to look any closer at such tragic events. He seems unable to grasp that the deaths of Americans are not merely a public relations problem. When six members of American armed forces are killed by a drone that slipped through U.S. defenses, the deaths of those service people are the story.

Americans should be alarmed to realize that their sons and daughters in combat are being overseen by a person as callous as Pete Hegseth. No one is asking for classified details to be released, but the people of the United States deserve more of an explanation of what’s happening in this war. And they certainly deserve more of an eulogy for their fallen children than “tragic things happen.”

Constance Burke is a Vietnam-era U.S. Navy hospital corpsman. After a career in health care, she retired and now spends her time hiking with her dogs, tending to her vegetable garden and working at Star...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *