Town of Superior Mayor Dominic Wolf and residents of Point of Rocks are raising concerns over air quality and environmental impacts stemming from the industrial evaporation ponds at the Jim Bridger Power Plant. The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality is looking into the issue. (Meagan Varley)

ROCK SPRINGS—The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality has initiated an investigation into the Jim Bridger Power Plant and a foul smell that seems to be coming from the plant’s evaporation ponds.

Residents living near the power plant have considered the operation a good neighbor, but over the last 12 to 18 months, an increasingly foul odor resembling sewer gas and rotten sulfur has left the nearby communities of Superior and Point of Rocks demanding action.

Residents and an elected official took their concerns over air quality and environmental impacts stemming from the industrial evaporation ponds at the plant — and the foul odor and white powder that is allegedly coming from the ponds — and reached out to the DEQ.

‘Unbearable’ smell

For Point of Rocks resident Roger Varley, whose family has lived in the area for 60 years, the change in air quality has altered daily life.

“All they had to do was open the windows and let the fresh, cool air in,” Varley said of his parents’ home, which lacked air conditioning. “We can’t do that now. It smells like rotten sulfur, and it’s unbearable. I have a 3-year-old granddaughter, and I’d like her to breathe fresh air.”

While the plant has maintained a strong relationship with the community for many years, the management of its wastewater and evaporation ponds has become a major sticking point, Varley said.

The industrial evaporation ponds hold liquid waste, including wastewater and soda liquor — a concentrated alkaline solution used in plant scrubbing operations, he said. Because of the massive volume of water present, relying on natural evaporation to dry out the beds so heavy equipment can drive on and cap them could take decades.

“There are days we feel we can’t live like this,” Varley said, stressing that engineers and specialists must account for the immediate human impact on small communities as they find solutions. “I’d like them to reassure us that it’s temporary.”

Superior Mayor Dominic Wolf said he received his first complaint regarding the smell roughly a year to a year and a half ago. Since then, the issues have escalated from sporadic nuisances to an ongoing problem.

“You notice the bad sewer smell more when the wind blows,” Wolf said, noting visiting construction crews at first thought the odor was a sewer backup.

The smell became particularly severe in late July, prompting Wolf to reach out to state regulators directly.

“We’ve been doing a water study for the last couple of months, and the crew said they couldn’t stand the smell. So I had enough and called the DEQ,” Wolf said. “I just wanted to be proactive and make sure everything’s protected.”

Wolf expressed worry for plant workers breathing the fumes daily, as well as local wildlife, noting a recent influx of sage grouse in the area.

He said he hopes everyone’s involvement will help bring health and environmental risks back down to safe levels, restoring peace of mind to residents.

Sweetwater County Board of Commissioners Chair Keaton West said Wolf reached out to the commission. The commission contacted the DEQ Air Quality to put its officials in touch with Wolf and also forwarded Wolf the contact information for the Air Compliance Inspector in Lander.

“Our latest understanding was that an investigation was initiated and inspectors would likely be out soon,” West said. “Although this is a DEQ matter, we share the same concerns for health and safety and want to ensure residents and workers in the area are safe and well-informed.”

In response to public inquiries, the Wyoming DEQ emphasized the importance of community involvement when environmental concerns arise.

Keith Guille, outreach manager, said it is crucial for residents and local leaders to reach out whenever something seems amiss.

“It’s our job to ensure the public is safe from the type of things that we regulate, but if we’re not the regulatory agency on that, we try to work with other partners as well,” Guille said. “If there’s ever a concern or something they see doesn’t make sense, they can always reach out to us, and we will definitely look into it.”

According to Guille, the DEQ has initiated an investigation. The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission will be involved as well.

The DEQ acknowledged reports of a white powdery substance blowing over several areas. Guille said the smell and the substance are not connected.

Soda liquor is a concentrated liquid solution made of alkaline chemicals — typically sodium carbonate (soda ash) or sodium hydroxide (caustic soda), Guille said. 

In local industrial uses, such as coal-fired power plants, it is used as a neutralizing liquid in flue gas scrubbers to strip sulfur dioxide (SO2) out of power plant exhaust before smoke leaves the stack. It creates a white powder when soda liquor spills or drains into evaporation ponds and dries out. High winds can whip up the leftover dry crust, dispersing a fine white, dusty powder across the area.

Guille said while soda liquor residue creates the visible white powder blown by wind, state regulators note it is odorless, meaning any separate sulfury or “rotten egg” smells in the area stem from a different source.

Jona Whitesides, a spokesperson for Rocky Mountain Power, said he was unaware of an upcoming investigation but noted the utility regularly coordinates with the DEQ, as waste streams and ash ponds require continuous monitoring.

“The smell has been on and off since the ‘80s,” Whitesides said. “Anytime you have a power plant and the scrubbers remove the sulfur dioxide and other pollutants from the exhaust, it doesn’t eliminate the odor, so you get that smell.”

He added that wind direction and weather conditions can make the odor stronger on given days.

“There are pros and cons to living near a power plant,” Whitesides said. “Your electricity is close and it employs a good workforce, and then there’s the smell from coal and other industry smells — it is an industrial facility.”

Whitesides said to remain environmentally conscious and comply with state and federal laws, scrubbers on the coal units actively strip sulfur dioxide and other pollutants from exhaust, which naturally generates a sulfur smell.

Trina Dennis Brittain is a community and news reporter for the Rocket Miner and Rawlins Times newspapers. She can be reached at tbrittain@rocketminer.com.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *