JACKSONโ€”The U.S. Department of the Interior is planning to move forward with intent to construct a bike path along the Moose-Wilson Road, despite concerns raised by Teton County commissioners and Jackson town councilors.

Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Kevin Lilly responded Nov. 3 to a letter commissioners wrote expressing disappointment in the way the department made the decision to build the path. Officials determined that the environmental impacts of a path were โ€œsufficiently analyzedโ€ in 2016 and further environmental review was not necessary, Lilly wrote.

Lillyโ€™s letter linked to a National Park Service webpage with frequently asked questions about the Moose-Wilson corridor, which said construction on one section of the path near Moose could begin in the summer of 2027.

โ€œAs the amended decision moves into implementation, the NPS will continue communicating with Teton County as project design and implementation details are developed,โ€ Lilly wrote to commissioners.

But county commissioners and advocates are unhappy with the response.

Joan Anzelmo, who reformed the Friends of the Moose-Wilson Corridor group to fight the path, called the response โ€œtotally unacceptableโ€ and an โ€œinsult to public participation and gateway community engagementโ€ in a news release sent Monday.

After President Donald Trump issued an executive order in April aimed at eliminating rules that needlessly restrict recreation in national parks, Grand Teton National Park announced it would revisit a decade-old decision not to construct a path along the 7.1-mile roadway. Park service officials did not conduct further environmental analysis, instead opting to look back at environmental reviews from 2016 and explore the possibility of coming to a different conclusion.

A vehicle drives on the Moose-Wilson Road in August 2023. U.S. Department of the Interior Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Kevin Lilly responded to Teton County commissionerโ€™s concerns about the process by which the department decided to build a controversial bike path along the road. (File photo by Bradly J. Boner, Jackson Hole Daily.)

In August, park officials announced they would build the path, leading advocates like Anzelmo to push the town and county to oppose it.

In the countyโ€™s original letter, commissioners pointed to Secretarial Order 3434, which directed national park service officials to meet regularly with leaders from gateway communities. The order directs the park service to alert gateway communities to major changes and the county said the decision to build the path โ€œwarranted earlier and more meaningful engagement with the County and the broader gateway community.โ€

Lillyโ€™s letter referenced a June 2026 โ€œgateway community meeting.โ€ Neither Anzelmo nor the Jackson Hole Daily was aware of the meeting.

โ€œIโ€™m not aware of any public meeting,โ€ Anzelmo told county commissioners Monday morning.

Teton County commissioners, meanwhile, floated the idea of requesting an in-person meeting with Lilly. Commissioner Len Carlman suggested meeting in Moose and possibly walking the Moose-Wilson Road with officials from the Interior department.

โ€œA walk on the corridor would be a good use of time and help that official understand our concerns,โ€ Carlman said.

Commissioner Luther Propst said the county should send representatives to Washington if the Interior Department does not come to Jackson Hole.

โ€œIf they donโ€™t want to come here for an on-site visit, maybe it means … that some of us should go to D.C. to schedule those meetings,โ€ Propst said.

The community wants โ€œpublic participation,โ€ Propst said, โ€œrather than just administrative fiat.โ€

The path is expected to cost between $35 million and $39 million, according to the park serviceโ€™s planning website. Officials have not yet fully identified where those funds will come from.

A lifelong Coloradan, Charley made his way north to Jackson to report on county government for the Jackson Hole News&Guide. Charley likes slow-cooking spaghetti Bolognese and racing sailboats.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name โ€” first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFileโ€™s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • Weโ€™re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on whatโ€™s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when theyโ€™re submitted โ€” or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. Weโ€™ll get to it when weโ€™re back in the office.
  • Weโ€™re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenterโ€™s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. Weโ€™ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If thatโ€™s going to upset you, itโ€™s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We donโ€™t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please donโ€™t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments โ€” maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *