On Making Diesel from Coal Pt. 2

Yesterday we examined how CO2 is created in generation of energy in people and power plants.  Today we move on to what can be done with the CO2.

The modern topic of much debate is to figure out how to capture the CO2 generated in coal power plants, sequester it, and put it underground.  Trying to convert CO2 to methane (CH4) would require huge amounts of energy; this would be reversing the oxidation (energy-releasing) process into reduction (energy-storing), which makes no sense.  The CO2 has to be trapped without reduction (i.e., without turning it back into methane or hydrocarbons), pressurized, and injected into some porous formation below the ground surface.

Every step in the process of segregating, capturing, compressing, transporting and injecting CO2 consumes energy, which means more CO2 is created in each stage.

Kind of reminds you of another inefficient idea: ethanol production, where diesel is used to till and plant and harvest corn, more hydrocarbons are used to make fertilizer, diesel is used to truck the corn to the plant, and natural gas is used to run the plant, and diesel is used to fuel the trains to haul the ethanol to a refinery.  Is there a net gain here?

Getting back to the start of the discussion, is there a net gain to capturing and injecting CO2 into underground storage caverns?  We need to ask Amoco and other oil companies which produce “sour gas” in western Wyoming, which is part methane, part hydrogen sulfide (toxic) and part CO2, among other things.  They do successfully separate these gases into marketable products.  The CO2 is now being conveyed by pipeline to old oil fields (“old oil fields” means oil fields where the operators initially recovered maybe 20% of the oil, then injected water and recovered another 10% or 20%), where it is injected into the productive formations.  The CO2 mixes with water to form a mild acid, and the pressurized mixture pushes oil out of the sandstone from the injection wells to the recovery wells.  The process appears to be economically viable, depending on the price of oil.

So, we could conclude that it is possible to recover the CO2, and economically viable under the right circumstances.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *