Roads and Views: I got mine, why should I give you one?

I have been writing about private roads and easements for years. In a state with no land-use planning prior to the past few years, with free-for-all land settlement and land sale practices, figuring out who has the right to cross someone else’s land to get to his or her paradise gets hot real fast. And figuring out who has the right to cross that paradise to get to someone else’s paradise gets even hotter.

These disputes often require expensive participation by lawyers. While I like making a good living, I wish that many cases could be resolved without huge expense. Sometimes I help someone obtain access, and sometimes I help someone push that burden off on somebody else. These cases typically involve a mix of topography, necessity, aesthetics and emotion, frequently a lot of emotion.

To escape stress and emotional disputes, I take a holiday trundling off to our little one-acre retreat in Montana, seeking diversion and relaxation.

Not for long. Here comes New Neighbor, who hired a surveyor to prove that the front third of our parking lot and the back third of the two outhouses are on his land. Those conclusions are an interesting mix of good and bad news. I would think, in the universe of facts supporting claims for adverse possession, that using another’s land for human waste disposal for 40 years is about as hostile and adverse a use as anyone could imagine. Sorting out these boundary issues could be interesting, but the worst thing is about to come: he wants to bulldoze a huge road through his land along our fence line to get from the county road to his back lot. The road would be on his land, beyond my control.

The five big windows in our old schoolhouse afford a view of the trees on his land, less than fifty yards away. Building a road will convert our private view out into a very public view into the schoolhouse. We will have to buy curtains.

What about our views? Our privacy? Our outhouse?

My partners ask: are there no rights? Is there no fairness?

These inquiries are largely irrelevant to the legal analysis of his rights. But maybe they will appeal to his personal mix of ethics and neighborliness. I wrote a nice letter; we will see.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. SO, RT……Did you go to sleep this week, miss your deadline or end up spending too many hours in court. Missing your column. Bill

    Reply
  2. Reply