Is there an app for that?

Name: Is there an app for that?
Uploaded: 2011-01-25T03:01:55-07:00
Channel: The Sage Grouse
Description: If we want to focus on weighty social issues which do affect the public purse, together with crime and morality, let’s talk about juvenile justice. Let’s talk about how to fund guardians ad litem for troubled youth, quality foster care and drug courts. Let’s try to do something about divorce rates among heterosexuals, particularly those with children. Is there an app for that?

by The Sage Grouse January 25, 2011September 22, 2021

The January Smithsonian magazine features a hilarious sendup of apps (smartphone applications) which might have been popular in the days of the pharoahs, Hannibal and Socrates. Many involved governance and politics. The Sage Grouse has been searching for a hook for comment on our newly-reconstituted, super-majority Wyoming Legislature, so I am borrowing the schtick: “apps” it will be.

Preface: It is my hypothesis that when nearly all of the legislators are Republicans, many or most of them are going to have to tax and spend just like Democrats if government is going to continue doing stuff. Is there an app to help Republicans emulate Democrats? I guess we will see. It happens every year anyway in Wyoming. You can’t be the “party of no” when you have actual responsibilities. But emulating Democrats across the board? Maybe not so much on certain gender-oriented topics.

Let’s see, we need to fix roads, fund municipalities, tease out energy and tax policies, help booming towns, clean up the environment, control wolves and meth, and maybe learn to manage CO2. And shouldn’t we do something about all of these tinderbox dying forests and the regrettable end of the timber industry? Is there an app for any of these?

Recall that the only reason to have a legislature at all is to create “apps,” i.e., solutions, for such problems.

But, no. NO, NO, NO!

We have to instead waste limited legislative time and ink on the possibility that five or six gay couples who were married in California or Massachusetts might come to Wyoming and imperiously demand that we respect their foreign-created status. District Court Judge Keith Kautz had one gay divorce case and now this is a crisis? How does this affect the public purse, or church attendance, or behavior in the streets or crime? Not at all.

If we want to focus on weighty social issues which do affect the public purse, together with crime and morality, let’s talk about juvenile justice. Let’s talk about how to fund guardians ad litem for troubled youth, quality foster care and drug courts. Let’s try to do something about divorce rates among heterosexuals, particularly those with children.

Is there an app for that?

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.