The Whiskey Mountain bighorn sheep herd once had about 2,500 animals. Today there are about 750. (Wyoming Game and Fish)

With more than 2,500 animals, the Whiskey Mountain bighorn sheep herd was once the world’s largest and the most renowned in the Lower 48, said Steve Kilpatrick, executive director of the Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation.

The sheep, which live near Dubois, were nationally important and used as a source for transplants throughout the West, said Daryl Lutz, the Lander region wildlife management coordinator for Wyoming Game and Fish Department.

Then pneumonia hit. A 1991 outbreak decimated the herd, killing about 30 percent of the animals. Normally a herd will recover to at least 80 percent of its original numbers after such an incident, but the Whiskey Mountain herd continued to decline, Kilpatrick said.

“For more than 20 years, we’ve wondered why won’t this herd get on its feet and get going again,” Kilpatrick said.

Now he has reason to hope he’ll soon have an answer.

A group of wildlife organizations — Wyoming Game and Fish, the Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation, the National Bighorn Sheep Interpretive Center and the University of Wyoming’s Ruckelshaus Institute are partnering in an effort to learn more about the herd and help it thrive.

“Bighorn sheep are iconic and represent the wildness and the wonder of Wyoming,” Kilpatrick said.

They are also frail, sensitive ungulates, whose immune systems can’t fight pneumonia, often introduced by domestic sheep.

Scientists hope to gain a more comprehensive understanding of nutrition, disease and possible genetics affecting the Whiskey Mountain sheep herd. (Wyoming Game and Fish)

Today the Whiskey Mountain herd has about 750 animals, Lutz said.

“Lamb survival has been about nil in the last few years,” he said.

Ewes in the herd have about an 80 percent pregnancy rate, but in recent years, most of the young have died by late fall, he said.

Several different strains of the pneumonia-causing bacteria have been found in the herd. Adult sheep can harbor the pathogens and pass them to lambs, which aren’t strong enough to survive the disease, Lutz said.

The Whiskey Mountain ewes are also smaller than those in other herds, Kilpatrick said. The animals don’t put on the 25 percent body fat sheep in other herds acquire in the summer. Lack of maternal mass can lead to smaller-than-average lambs.

“Why aren’t these sheep doing well in the summer, when it appears they are in a rich nutritional environment?” Kilpatrick said. “A comprehensive look at nutrition, disease and possible genetics would help us out a lot.”

A University of Wyoming study, which began this week, will provide some of that needed data, researchers hope. The study will collar ewes and fit them with vaginally implanted transmitters. The transmitters will come out when the sheep give birth, alerting researchers who will then try to collar the lamb. Ideally the collared lamb will survive to adulthood. But if it dies, the scientists can find the collar immediately and determine the cause of death, Lutz said.

This intensive study is only one piece of the collaboration. The groups will work on community engagement with people in Dubois and also bring together bighorn sheep experts from around North America for a summit.

Never Miss a Peaks to Plains. Subscribe for free.

“I hope we come up with some novel solutions and untested ideas,” Lutz said.

The Whiskey Mountain herd isn’t the only wild sheep population in decline. In the 1960s there were tens of thousands of bighorn sheep in Wyoming and an estimated 1.5 million in the West, Kilpatrick said. There are now about 6,500 in the state and 85,000 in the region.

What’s learned studying the Whiskey Mountain herd can be used to help manage other sheep populations — pneumonia was recently discovered in Dall sheep in Alaska, Lutz said.

“If we can understand why [the Whiskey Mountain] herd is so dramatically affected by these bacteria then we may have a better understanding of the ecology and the disease effects on curled-horned, mountain sheep throughout the continent,” Lutz said.

It’s also helpful for wildlife managers to know what problem they are trying to solve, Kilpatrick said. For example, if the collaboration discovers an issue related to available nutrition, managers could employ prescribed burns to provide forage, he said.  

Lutz said within a year he expected some tangible results from the collaboration, but helping the herd was a long-term process that will take years.

Kelsey Dayton is a freelancer and the editor of Outdoors Unlimited, the magazine of the Outdoor Writers Association of America. She has worked as a reporter for the Gillette News-Record, Jackson Hole News&Guide...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *