The Wyoming State Capitol lit up at night during the 2020 session. An internal memo sent to lawmakers from their fiscal analysts on April 10 predicts revenue drops that could range anywhere from $555 million to $2.8 billion over the next two years. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Wyoming state government revenues could plummet from anywhere between $555 million and nearly $2.8 billion over the next two years as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and an oil price war, according to a memo the Legislative Service Office sent to lawmakers on April 10.

Though what will unfold in the coming months remains anyone’s guess, the revenue decline could be so dire that, as one lawmaker put it, it would require the most “painful change the state has had to ever deal with.” 

LSO fiscal analysts drew up revenue predictions for three scenarios — optimistic, intermediate and pessimistic. They looked at impacts across sales and use taxes, oil, gas and coal severance taxes and only some of the state’s investments — leading some lawmakers to predict the realities could be even worse in a time of stock market turmoil. 

The analysts urged lawmakers to view the estimates as “informed guesses,” given deep uncertainty about what the future holds. Still, even the best-case estimate is staggering. 

For the optimistic scenario of “a shorter economic downturn and a quicker recovery,” according to the memo, analysts predicted a loss of $555.8 million in revenue.

An intermediate scenario assumes “continued economic disruption throughout the summer and a modest recovery over the next year,” with a slower recovery rate than the optimistic scenario. The intermediate scenario anticipates a $1.76 billion hit. 

The intermediate scenario “is not necessarily the expected scenario,” the analysts wrote in the memo. “Nonetheless, it does use the timeliest information, e.g., current futures prices of major commodities.” 

A pessimistic scenario “incorporates a drawn out crisis with an extended recovery,” the memo said, “for example, a second wave of the virus, potentially next fall, and a much slower recovery compared to the other scenarios.”

Under that outcome, the state could lose nearly $2.8 billion in revenues. That number is comparable to the entirety of the general government spending budget for the next two years.

The budget lawmakers passed in March spends $2.9 billion of state funds on general government and $2 billion on public schools in fiscal years 2021 and 2022. It allots billions more in federal funding and other dollars. All told the budget prescribes more than $7 billion in spending for the next two years.

The Legislature has nearly $1.4 billion in its most accessible savings account, nicknamed the rainy day fund.

The April 10 memo from the analysts to the entire Legislature was obtained by WyoFile and has not been made public until now. 

The memo’s predictions come with considerable caveats, written at a time when people the world over begin each week unsure what the pandemic will bring. 

The memo is an LSO product, and was not crafted through the same process that sets the official revenue estimates used in budgeting. The Wyoming Legislature writes the state’s budget using projections of the revenues that will come in over the two-year budget period. Those projections are crafted by a group of fiscal analysts and economists from across state government called the Consensus Revenue Estimating Group, or CREG. 

The CREG did now draw up the memo to lawmakers, though CREG members offered input and Don Richards, a co-chairman of the group and the LSO’s top fiscal analyst, was one of its authors. CREG’s predictions are far more precise than the wide ranges included in the memo. 

Support independent reporting — donate to WyoFile today.

Nationally it remains unclear when COVID-19’s spread will slow, allowing officials to lift the preventative measures to keep people apart — measures that have resulted in a near shutdown of the economy. Much also remains unknown about the virus itself, the potential development of vaccines, improved testing and many other factors that will shape the broader picture.

The federal government has already passed a bill pumping $2 trillion in aid into the country, and more stimulus actions are appearing on the horizon. The economic impacts of such legislation, including the potential to “over-stimulate” some sectors and drive up inflation, is unknown, the memo notes. 

“Given the lack of precedent, lack of reliable internal and external modelling [sic], and the diversity of both Wyoming anecdotal information and national forecasts – many of which have been regularly revised over the past month – the confidence one should place on these scenarios is limited,” the memo reads. 

In a stark description of the widespread uncertainty, the memo includes this caveat: “It is also possible that the world economy could deteriorate throughout the entire next [two-year period] without a meaningful recovery.” 

Lobbyists and others mingle during the 2020 Legislative session in the underground hallway that connects the Wyoming State Capitol with state office buildings. Lawmakers left without addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, which at the end of the session was just on the verge of its dramatic upheaval of life. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

The Legislature adjourned in early March without addressing the virus or its economic impact. At the time the pandemic was just beginning its surge in the U.S. Within days of lawmakers adjourning and heading home, however, the virus and the response to it had upended most aspects of Wyoming life and derailed the state and national economies.

Even the memo’s most optimistic scenario presents a challenge to a state that’s already responding to a sustained downturn in the energy markets with years of budget cutting and withdrawals from savings accounts. 

The memo was sent to lawmakers before legislative leadership convenes on April 16 to consider how the Legislature should respond to COVID-19. Leading lawmakers have said a special session is nearly inevitable at this point.

The state is slated to receive $1.25 billion in federal aid under the COVID-19 CARES Act passed by Congress. To what extent the Legislature can use that money to make up for shortfalls in revenue remains unknown, and is sure to become a critical question, several lawmakers interviewed by WyoFile over the weekend said. 

The Legislature’s researchers and other state officials are evaluating the CARES act to determine how the money can be spent, according to a March 27 email from Senate President Drew Perkins to the rest of the Senate. However, the initial assessment in his email was that without further law changes, the money can’t fill revenue holes.

“CARES relief is specifically not available to replace income or revenue,” Perkins wrote in the email, which was also obtained by WyoFile. 

Lawmakers react

Leaders of the Revenue and Appropriations Committee reached on Easter expressed awe at the size of the potential revenue hits, and said lawmakers will soon have difficult decisions to make.

“It is an overwhelming, massive shock to the way Wyoming’s operated for 100 years and it will be the most dynamic, painful change the state has had to ever deal with,” House Revenue Committee Chairman Dan Zwonitzer (R-Cheyenne) said.

House Revenue Committee Chairman Dan Zwonitzer

The state has faced fiscal problems for several years, but stock market earnings and savings accounts have helped the Legislature avoid steeper cuts or increased taxes. With at least one and maybe more special sessions on the horizon to address COVID-19 impacts and the drop in oil prices, lawmakers won’t be able to push harder decisions further down the road, Zwonitzer said.

“There’s no more shell game, no more smoke and mirrors,” he said, “it’s a full blown armageddon to Wyoming’s budget.”

Leaders first must find out to what extent they can tap the $1.25 billion stimulus, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Eli Bebout (R-Riverton) said. Bebout expressed more optimism about the stimulus money’s potential than others. 

“I would hope we could utilize it to plug some of these holes,” he said. 

The federal government will have to consider the virus’s impacts to state economies and governments in a broad way, he said. Spending “$1.25 billion on health care only, I don’t know how we could do that,” he said. Bebout hoped to direct some of the money at struggling rural hospitals, he said.

The Joint Appropriations Committee did not have immediate plans for budget hearings or a deeper look on the budget that was just passed, Bebout said. First, the Legislature would look at the stimulus money, and then “let this thing shake out,” he said. 

House Appropriations Committee Chairman Bob Nicholas (R-Cheyenne) did not respond to an emailed request for comment sent Sunday evening.

Zwonitzer, and Senate Revenue Committee Chairman Cale Case (R-Lander), said the magnitude of the predicted drops will require the Legislature to reconsider tax increases it has shelved many times. 

Case did not see the stimulus money as a chance to avoid tough decisions. “There’s bound to be gray areas, but I don’t think the gray areas are going to be so substantial that we can pretend like it’s a new source of money that we can spend however we want,” he said.

Case ticked off potential increases to property and sales taxes, a corporate income tax, a tax on electricity imported out of the state and other measures lawmakers declined to pursue last session. If more dire predictions in the revenue report hold, “it’s going to take all of these and as much cutting of government as we can stand,” he said. 

The drop in revenues also comes at a time when many areas in Wyoming will need state help both economically and via direct services, Zwonitzer said. “This is really a crisis that affects all parts of Wyoming.” 

Bebout worried about increasing taxes anytime soon. “What a terrible thing to do to business,” he said. “They’re struggling to keep their doors open and now you’re going to raise their taxes?”

At the same time, “we can’t cut $1.7 billion. There’s just no way we can do that,” he said. 

Read the memo from LSO’s fiscal analysts to lawmakers:


State Revenue Scenarios 04102020 (PDF)

State Revenue Scenarios 04102020 (Text)




State Revenue Scenarios 04102020 (PDF)

State Revenue Scenarios 04102020 (Text)

Andrew Graham

Andrew Graham is reporting for WyoFile from Laramie. He covers state government, energy and the economy. Reach him at 443-848-8756 or at andrew@wyofile.com, follow him @AndrewGraham88

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Wyoming government has refused to do anything to diversify its income, blindly relying on the energy industry to be the “pennies from heaven”. The chickens have finally come home to roost, but they don’t have a place to roost or funds to build one with. I’m sure some legislator or legislators are still blind to the dire situation and are sure the energy business is coming back. We desperately need term limits in Wyoming, along with a lot of new faces that have some business sense. We also need to make the budget fully transparent. I know there are many places to cut and/or eliminate items government has no business financing.

  2. A couple of months ago the state was seriously considering using the $1.4 billion savings fund to buy Occidental’s oil properties. Wow, what a disaster that would have been.

  3. Nice article, the numbers are over blown to some degree, I would have more faith in the numbers if they came from CREG, but the overall trend is on track.

    With that said, of the 8 comments posted as I write this, 5 are calling for new taxes of which 4 push the tax burden fully on to someone else and 1 partially pushes the tax burden on to every one else. Nobody is arguing for across the board taxes for all citizens. Until the people of this state are willing to really assess how much government they want and the State stops shuffling the shell game around and really focuses on their spending problem, you will never get fair and balanced tax reform thru the legislature. Let’s tax agriculture, let’s tax the big box stores, let’s tax Joe down the street because he as a big house. At some point you run out of other peoples money. Look how taxing more and spending more is working out for those high tax states on the east coast. Until we all feel the pain across the board, government spending will continue to run amok and you will never had a truly fair and balanced tax system.

    Government would look a lot different if everybody was pulling their proportionate weight and had to feel that tax pain. But when you are subsidized by the mineral/energy industry it is easier to look the other way when it’s not coming out of your pocket.

  4. Thank heavens the senate was wise enough to stop capital spending this year in the 2020 budget. With hind sight this is a huge blessing freeing up money for the crisis.

  5. Good job reporting, Thank You Wyofile! A gas tax on a sliding scale would go a long ways. Set the lowest price the consumer in Wyoming will pay for a gallon of gasoline or diesel at $2.50. If the price drops to $2.00, that’s $.50 a gallon that goes into a maintenance account. Right now, the national average for a gallon of gasoline is $1.85. Looks to me like Wyoming is loosing a lot of money with their anti tax mentality.

  6. Thanks, Andrew.
    Without your reporting, this remarkably important information would not be available to the public. Why the Casper Star chose to push it to page 3 in its April 15 print editions is a bit of a head-scratcher.

  7. N.B.:
    This in itself speaks volumes:
    “The April 10 memo from the analysts to the entire Legislature was obtained by WyoFile and has not been made public until now. ”

    Thank you, Mr. Graham, and Wyofile! We need you now more than ever.

  8. Thanks for publishing this. I hope we the people will get engaged with ideas also. Here is one: there are many properties in Wyoming being taxed at the very low agriculture rate when in fact the owners are receiving income from industrial uses like oil & gas extraction, gravel mining, hunting outfitting, etc. on those lands or indeed using the land mainly as a tax haven. There is some low hanging fruit & it is so ripe it borders on rotten.

  9. With Walmart and Amazon booming by taking business that local retailers have lost to the sheltering orders, the place to start is the tax on big box stores proposed by Rep. Obermueller.

    Thanks for publicizing this memo,

  10. You’ve got the super super wealthy using this state as a tax haven. I think there’s some revenue right there.

  11. Could be the best thing to ever happen to Wyoming. It seems unlikely that the elected officials will get serious about raising homegrown revenue via taxes and stop the handouts to the wealthy tax dodgers who call Wyoming home – mostly in Teton County but certainly not exclusively.

    Nothing like a crisis to give birth to necessity which is the mother of invention.

    I don’t expect anything but regressive taxes on the majority and favored status to the wealthy.