A federal judge in Denver on Monday blocked federal officials from breaking up Boulder’s National Center for Atmospheric Research by handing over a renowned supercomputing center to the University of Wyoming, in a 38-page injunction raking the Trump administration for enacting political revenge on Colorado. 

Senior U.S. District Judge R. Brooke Jackson issued an injunction because the National Science Foundation divesting the supercomputing center was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,” according to the ruling. Jackson said his injunction was necessary because the lawsuit filed in March by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, or UCAR, was likely to succeed, and that too much damage had already been done to the supercomputing center’s operations. 

The NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center has “already lost significant number of experts in supercomputing, for example, with the chance of losing many more,” the judge wrote. 

The National Science Foundation declined comment on the injunction late Monday, through head of media affairs Mike England.

UCAR, a consortium of more than 100 universities and the contracted manager of NCAR operations, “has made a showing of irreparable harm through the significant ‘brain drain’ that it is already experiencing as a direct result” of the National Science Foundation’s attempted transfer, the judge wrote. “It will also continue to lose critical employees — including scientists, engineers, and systems administrators — that are essential to the continuous and proper functioning of the NWSC.”

The original lawsuit and the injunction say the supercomputing center is a “pillar” of the nation’s atmospheric research. Judge Jackson agreed with the UCAR lawsuit’s claim that breaking off parts of NCAR, dismantling projects and potentially firing thousands of employees was intended by Trump and agency officials as direct political revenge.

UCAR’s suit employed the same arguments that Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser used in dozens of lawsuits: that Trump sought retribution for Colorado voting Democratic in elections and for imprisoning former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters after she was convicted of orchestrating a security breach of her county’s election system in 2021 in a failed attempt to uncover voter fraud. 

Coincidentally, Peters was released from a Pueblo prison Monday morning under a clemency order by Gov. Jared Polis, who said her original nine-year prison sentence was too long. In yet another twist, many Colorado Democrats are now furious with Polis for ordering her to be paroled after serving less than two years of her sentence. 

In his injunction, Jackson accepted UCAR’s timeline of how the attacks on NCAR developed in early 2026, noting that the administration had previously floated general ideas for turning over federal agency duties to other entities.

“No action followed until President Trump publicly criticized Governor Polis for refusing to release Ms. Peters after his own pardon did not achieve that result. The next day, (Office of Management and Budget) Director (Russell) Vought publicly announced the breakup of NCAR on social media,” Jackson wrote. (Trump could not legally pardon Peters because she was convicted on state charges; only Polis could pardon her or commute her sentence.)

“The Court finds that UCAR is likely to succeed on its claim that NSF’s decision to divest it of stewardship” over the supercomputing center violated federal procedures.

“First, the agency has offered no explanation for its decision. Second, the agency failed to abide its own process to consider public feedback before proceeding with the transfer,” Jackson wrote. He cited NSF’s “flagrant disregard” of its own rules and procedures.  

The injunction is necessary while the lawsuit plays out, Jackson added, because allowing the transfer would prompt more employees to leave and decimate the supercomputing center. 

“UCAR further warns that, as a result of the transfer process now underway, it may have to close the facility and conduct mass layoffs,” the judge wrote.

This story was published by The Colorado Sun on June 1, 2026. Learn more about the nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom and sign up for newsletters at coloradosun.com.

Michael Booth is The Colorado Sun’s environment writer, and co-author of The Sun’s weekly climate and health newsletter The Temperature. He and John Ingold host the weekly SunUp podcast on The Temperature...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *