Peabody Energy, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, and one of Wyoming's largest coal mine operators, put months of speculation to rest by filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy (Creative Commons photo by Paul Sableman)
Share this:

A citizens’ complaint filed Monday asks the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality to deem Peabody Energy out of compliance for $790 million in coal mine reclamation liability in the state.

Peabody, Wyoming’s largest coal producer and the largest coal miner in the world, is expected to file for bankruptcy protection soon. By determining that Peabody no longer qualifies to self-bond, the state would better secure its claim to the company’s full $790 million reclamation liability, said Shannon Anderson, an attorney for the Sheridan-based Powder River Basin Resource Council.

“It’s pretty clear where this company is headed, so now is the time to take action,” Anderson said. “We believe as a matter of law a company in financial collapse is no longer financially solvent,” and therefore doesn’t qualify to self bond.

Mine operators are required by state and federal law to post bond or guarantee securities sufficient to cover the cost of environmental clean-up at the end of a mine’s life should they abandon operations. Companies that can meet the “self-bonding” classification are not required to secure actual bonds or sureties, but are considered financially sound enough to meet their full reclamation liability.

The Powder River Basin Resource Council and the Western Organization of Resource Councils filed the complaint regarding Peabody, similar to complaints regarding self-bonding qualifications for Alpha Natural Resources and Arch Coal. Both of those companies are already reorganizing under Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Wyoming DEQ declared in 2015 that Alpha Natural Resources no longer qualified for self-bonding, but struck a deal with the company and bankruptcy court for a $61 million “super-priority” for the company’s $411 million reclamation obligation. The agency struck a similar deal with Arch, securing $75 million in creditor priority plus another $17 million in collateral for the company’s inactive mine operations in the Hanna Basin.

However, Wyoming DEQ has determined that Arch still qualifies under the current set of self-bonding rules and regulations, because the bonding is set up under a private subsidiary owned by Arch. Likewise, Peabody has set up its self-bonding under a privately held subsidiary.

Wyoming DEQ spokesman Keith Guille said the agency’s current self-bonding determination for struggling coal companies is based on the most recent full-year financial reports, which are from 2014. The agency will review self-bonding status again when 2015 financial reports are issued in the next month or so.

“We see some struggling there [with Alpha, Arch and Peabody] and I don’t think anybody denies that,” Guille said.

However, he said, the state must base its determinations on the current set of self-bonding rules and regulations as set by the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, which has also asked DEQ to submit fresh reviews of Alpha, Arch and Peabody self-bonding.

Meantime, there are several calls for re-examining the entire surface mine bonding program, from both the federal and state levels.

“Those discussions are happening with the Office of Surface Mining [Reclamation and Enforcement] and internally here,” Guille said.

— Creative Commons photo by Paul Sableman.

— Read the citizens’ complaint regarding Peabody Energy’s self-bonding status:

 


Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 26 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy industry in...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *