Share this:

In December, after an extraordinarily controversial planning process, the Biden administration’s Bureau of Land Management signed off on a final resource management plan that’s now governing 3.6 million acres of southwestern Wyoming. 

The Rock Springs-area plan sought to balance the needs of development and wildlife, though unhappy Wyoming leaders maintained it tilted too far toward conservation at the expense of industrial activities.

Over 280,000 acres of the so-called Golden Triangle, for example — home to the densest population of sage grouse left on Earth — was designated as an “area of critical environmental concern,” excluded from surface-disturbing activities and expressly closed to mineral leasing. 

Ten months later, the BLM is proposing to put 14 parcels encompassing 19,839 acres of the closed area up for auction at a June 2026 oil and gas lease sale, according to a Rocky Mountain Wild analysis

This map illustrates oil and gas leases proposed for auction in closed-to-leasing (gridded pattern) areas managed by the Bureau of Land Management’s Rock Springs Field Office. (A. Gallensky/Rocky Mountain Wild)

Although it’s in the process of being revised by the Trump administration’s BLM, the Rock Springs Resource Management Plan that was approved in December 2024 remains “active” and in effect, employees with the agency told WyoFile in the spring. The agency’s proposal to offer oil and gas leases in violation of the current land-use plan has Bureau of Land Management watchdogs scratching their heads.

“If you’re [offering] parcels that have been closed under a valid and existing RMP, that would seem to be illegal,” said Matt Gaffney, an attorney who directs legal and government affairs for the Wyoming Outdoor Council.

The illegality is spelled out in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the law governing the administration of BLM lands, Gaffney said. Every BLM field office — in this case, Rock Springs — has a resource management plan that guides decision-making. If a lessee or permittee is found to be in violation of that plan, they’re issued an order of noncompliance and can be subject to civil penalties. 

If the BLM violates its own land-use plan, he said, the remedy would be suing to stop the action in federal district court or filing an appeal with the Interior Board of Land Appeals.

The nearly 20,000 Golden Triangle acres proposed for inclusion in BLM’s June 2026 oil and gas lease sale were nominated in 2021 by Kirkwood Oil and Gas, according to Steve Degenfelder, a landman for the Casper-based outfit. 

Landman Steve Degenfelder, of Kirkwood Oil and Gas, details his opposition to designating a pronghorn migration corridor in the energy-rich Green River Basin at a September 2025 meeting in Lander. (Mike Koshmrl)

In 2019, under the previous resource management plan, BLM leased 23,626 acres of the Golden Triangle, some of which went to Kirkwood. An “emergency letter” from Wyoming Outdoor Council and Audubon Rockies asking Gov. Mark Gordon to intervene failed to halt the sale at the time. 

Six years later, Degenfelder says Kirkwood needs the additional acres to make a Golden Triangle drilling operation viable. Pulling back the leases from the auction could jeopardize “many billions of dollars” in drilling revenue, he said. 

“This is the conundrum the federal government and environmental groups need to realize,” Degenfelder told WyoFile. “The resource, if it’s there as we envision, it’s a great deal of tax revenue and revenue to the state of Wyoming and to the federal government. It’s not going to be developed if there’s big holes in the play.” 

If the leases do go to auction, wildlife stipulations will likely be affixed, though it remains unclear what exactly.

“I don’t know what the stipulations are going to be with respect to those lands within the no-leasing area,” Degenfelder said.  

The designated Sublette Mule Deer Migration Corridor, in brown, is intersected by 32 parcels totaling 38,727 acres that the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to auction during a June oil and gas lease sale. (Wyoming Outdoor Council)

A stipulation instructing drillers to coordinate with Wyoming wildlife managers would likely be attached to parcels that intersect with a migration path used by mule deer traveling from the Red Desert to Hoback — the state’s first designated migration corridor. 

There’d also likely be sage grouse stipulations in the area, which is designated a “priority habitat management area with limited exceptions.”  Sprawling between Farson and the Wind River Range’s remote western slope, the 367,000-acre Golden Triangle region is considered the best of the best sagebrush-steppe habitat remaining and home to “the highest [sage] grouse density areas on Earth,” according to biologists. 

Meanwhile, migrating pronghorn that use a corridor that’s been “identified” but not yet “designated” would go without the same protective stipulation unless Wyoming completes its process in advance of the lease sale. 

The identified Sublette Pronghorn Migration Corridor, in orange, is intersected by 31 parcels totaling 49,329 acres that the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to auction during a June oil and gas lease sale. (Wyoming Outdoor Council)

Degenfelder is optimistic that horizontal drilling and other techniques can spare the Golden Triangle’s world-class wildlife resources from population declines and abandonment documented in other Green River Basin gas fields, like the Pinedale Anticline. 

“I really do feel like avoidance of surface disturbance and disturbance to wildlife can be achieved with new technology,” he said. 

But some Wyoming conservation groups are maintaining that stipulations and technology aren’t enough and that the leases should never have been offered in the first place.

“It’s deeply troubling that BLM is trying to lease parcels that are closed to protect intact wildlife habitat in the Golden Triangle,” said Julia Stuble, Wyoming state director for The Wilderness Society. “The agency has to quickly remove these leases from offer and clean up whatever internal review is not working in allowing these parcels to even get through to this stage. We don’t want to see this happen again.” 

A flock of sage grouse erupt from the sagebrush in the Golden Triangle region. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile

It’s unclear why the parcels were offered. BLM officials with the state headquarters office in Cheyenne were unreachable for an interview. With the federal government shut down, the agency is only responding to “urgent” media inquiries related to visitor access, safety and essential operations, according to a U.S. Department of Interior spokeswoman.

The BLM is taking feedback on its June 2026 oil and gas lease sale until Nov. 17. Public comments can be submitted online

Mary Jo Rugwell, a retired BLM-Wyoming state director, said that she understands frustrations with the current Rock Springs Resource Management Plan. Calling it “problematic” would be “understating it,” she said, but that doesn’t excuse ignoring the governing document for the area. 

“There’s the process that you have to follow,” Rugwell said. “The problem is that now processes are not being followed in a lot of instances. It’s a very different time right now.”

Other former federal employees are urging swift action to eliminate the Golden Triangle oil and gas leases from the agency’s June 2026 auction. 

“You cannot include any lease sale lands that are not available for leasing, that is not open to interpretation under any law,” said Nada Culver, the former BLM deputy director who signed the Rock Springs plan in December. 

Whatever the BLM’s rationale is for proposing the leases, there’s “no excuse,” Culver said. 

“The important thing is they need to fix it immediately,” she said.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. If We the People are interested in wildlife, we will demand that no new plans occur on federal lands until such a time that we have adequate representation that is agreed upon by the public, especially the entire public in Wyoming and not just those that have been misinformed about jobs, roads and other attributes that are known to affect wildlife populations….and it really shouldn’t depend on what species.

  2. The only “winners” that will come out of this are the lawyers as this is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

  3. As usual, conservation of wildlife always seems to take a back seat to the “really important” issues of energy development. Remember when the Pinedale Anticline development was thought to displace several thousand wintering Mule deer? Developers said the deer would just go somewhere else. Now deer numbers in the area have never rebounded, and I believe that heavy industrial development is one of the main reasons. They didn’t go somewhere else, they died due to habitat loss.