The Wyoming State Capitol during the 67th Legislature in 2023. (Megan Lee Johnson/WyoFile)

A draft Bureau of Land Management plan for the administration of 3.6 million acres in southwest Wyoming sparked disapproval from the highest levels of state government this summer, along with plenty of misinformation and hysteria. Now, it’s spawned legislation as well. 

House Bill 36 – Natural Resource Protection Act would bar Wyoming and its political subdivisions from using “any personnel, funds appropriated by the legislature or any other source of funds” in support of any federal land management action that the governor — independent of court action — deemed illegal.

Sen. Affie Ellis (R-Cheyenne) at the Wyoming Legislature’s 2023 general session in Cheyenne. (Megan Lee Johnson /WyoFile)

Put more simply, the legislation could bar state officials from enforcing federal rules — and let the governor decide which regulations make the cut. 

Sen. Affie Ellis (R-Cheyenne), an attorney, is among the bill’s detractors and cast the lone vote against the measure in the Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee. She worries that her fellow legislators are intruding on the system of laws and policies that have long been used to sort out disagreements over federal land management in Wyoming. 

“This is essentially turning the governor into a judge,” Ellis told fellow committee members during a November meeting. “I am a little concerned with how the two branches of government are working together.” 

“This is essentially turning the governor into a judge.”

Affie Ellis

Sen. Brian Boner (R-Douglas), who chairs the Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee, disagrees. 

Referencing part of the draft plan that called for the closure of 15,000 miles of BLM roads — an inclusion that the agency said was a mistake — Boner told WyoFile, “It’s just a clear statement that if they do, at some point, cross that line and shut down public access, then we’re simply not going to assist them.”

House Bill 36 includes some political gesturing, like a declaration that the “f​​ederal government shall comply with federal law when administering federal lands.” But the legislation also includes components that could have real implications in Wyoming. One such component stipulates that Wyoming and its political subdivisions not use any Wyoming resources in support of any federal land management actions that are deemed illegal. 

What constitutes illegal? Illegality would be determined outside of the court of law. The “governor, with advice from the attorney general,” would instead be the arbiter of a regulation’s legality, according to the bill.

Ellis explained in an interview that her no vote on HB 36 in committee had nothing to do with the Rock Springs RMP, which she does not support. Rather, her opposition was related to her own experience working with federal environmental laws, like the National Environmental Policy Act, which is the overarching policy guiding the BLM’s planning process.

“I see those processes work very effectively,” she told WyoFile, “particularly when an agency has not been following the requirements of NEPA and other federal laws.” 

Attendees tune into a meeting about the BLM’s Rock Springs Area Resource Management Plan Revision in Rock Springs in November 2023. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

In the realm of federal environmental laws, there are avenues for administrative opposition: submitting comments and engaging in objection processes. If parties remain dissatisfied, they still have recourse: They can sue. 

Ellis told her colleagues on the Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee that the conventional system can still stop a federal government decision in its tracks.

“If the agency is still moving forward with a preferred alternative that people really dislike — that our state objects to — they would file something called a preliminary injunction in federal court,” Ellis said. “That would preserve the status quo.” 

But a judge would have to agree to the injunction. 

Having the governor and attorney general make their own independent legal conclusion “intrudes on the roles of other branches of government,” Ellis told WyoFile. 

Sen. Brian Boner (R-Douglas) during the Wyoming Legislature’s 2021 session. (Michael Cummo/Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)

Boner, a farmer and rancher by trade, doesn’t see it that way. The act, he said, “does not interfere” with litigation. Lawsuits could run in parallel to the governor’s non-judicial determination, he said. 

“This is separate,” Boner said. “We’re just simply saying that we’re not going to help you in the meantime.” 

While the Natural Resource Protection Act made it through the interim committee with only Ellis in opposition, her concerns did help shape the bill. At her urging, a section that would have exposed any “public officer” to misdemeanor charges for “knowingly violat[ing]” the statute was amended out. 

House Bill 36 will require a two-thirds vote of support upon introduction to advance in the Legislature’s budget session, which starts Monday. 

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I couldn’t tell whether this article was an opinion or a news report until I read the reporter’s bio and saw that he’s a reporter and not an opinion columnist.

  2. Don’t forget who owns federal public land- all of America. The guy in Chicago has just as much legitimacy to managing PUBLIC land as the Wyoming resident.

    1. Easily said when it’s not your back yard and the closures don’t devastate your heritage and the local economy. The guy in Chicago should focus on buying a bullet proof vest for their out of control murder rate. The public lands in Wyoming provide low cost natural gas, coal, wind power, solar, uranium and very soon lithium. Providing all these sources of energy to Chicago and the nation. This proposal is a travesty engineered by the Biden administration to punish Wyoming’s economy for being a red state. Wyoming is one of the only states where Biden or any President cannot create a national monument by congressional law. So his administration is creating vast new wilderness areas through the proposed BLM Resource Management Plan and new BLM policy creating Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). Political paybacks owed by Biden to the Sierra Club and others.

      1. Repeating lies about crime has worked as the public repeats these lies without a filter. Violent crime, rapes and murders have been falling consistently since 1990 with a slight uptick in murder during Trump’s pandemic. That uptick was most closely associated with the increase in families murdering each other when people began to spend more time with their “loved ones”.

        I know Wyomingites loved to be lied too, but they should really read and think more rather than listen to the lies from Trump, Hageman and right wing radio.