Cindy Hill vows to resume her former duties Monday morning

By Ron Feemster
— March 6, 2014
Superintendent of Public Instruction Cindy Hill speaks at a press conference today announcing she will return to the Wyoming Department of Education without waiting for a court order to do so. (WyoFile/Ron Feemster — click to enlarge)
Superintendent of Public Instruction Cindy Hill speaks at a press conference today announcing she will return to the Wyoming Department of Education without waiting for a court order to do so. (WyoFile/Ron Feemster — click to enlarge)

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Cindy Hill announced today that she is going back to work at the Department of Education headquarters in the Hathaway Building on Monday, whether or not a district court judge writes the order that would restore her duties.

Hill was relieved of her duties at the end of the 2013 legislative session, when the governor signed Senate File 104. Hill sued the state and won a 3-2 decision in January, when the state Supreme Court declared the new law unconstitutional. The court ordered Laramie County District Court Judge Thomas Campbell to issue an order to enforce the higher court’s ruling. But the judge has yet to write the order. Hill maintains an office in the State Museum on Central Ave.

“Monday, March 10 at 8 a.m. I will resume my duties as state Superintendent of Public Instruction, the job I was elected to do,” Hill told a group of journalists gathered in an exhibit hall of the museum.

Hill’s announcement left education department employees and legislators gasping in disbelief.

“About half of the department was listening in on the call,” said Richard Crandall, the director of the Department of Education, who was appointed by the governor last summer after a national search for candidates.

Crandall spoke with WyoFile as he was leaving the Capitol after meeting with Gov. Matt Mead and his staff. The governor would be directing Attorney General Peter Michael to issue a statement clarifying the law, Crandall said.

Crandall, who at first declined to comment on the record, said he was concerned that everyone wait for the court order and follow the law.

Later in the day, Crandall held a brief press conference. He explained that he would be waiting for Hill at the front door of the Hathaway building with a letter from the Attorney General, which he would share with Hill. He had no plans to prevent her from entering the building.

“She can come in and walk around certain parts of the building like any member of the public,” Crandall said. “But she can’t go into people’s offices. We don’t allow the general public to walk in and out of people’s offices.”

Hill began her press conference by reciting the oath of office she took when she was sworn into office. She noted that the governor and the state legislators take the identical oath to obey the constitution of the United States and the state of Wyoming.

She then read aloud from the Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing a passage that instructed the state to take action “without delay.” At that point she called on the governor and the Legislature to restore the duties that SF104 stripped from her office.

Asked if the “without delay” passage relates to the restoration of her duties or the judge’s obligation to issue an order, she said the passage clearly related to restoring the duties of her old job.

“The Supreme Court expressed the urgency of returning the superintendent to office,” Hill said. “The state must return to constitutional compliance as quickly as possible.”

Hill accused “the governor and his lawyers of plotting new delaying tactics.” She said she was going back to work to “serve the children of Wyoming.”

Hill was unconcerned when asked about how the Department of Education staff and security officers might respond to her entrance.

“As always, we’ll work together,” Hill said. “Our focus is on the children of Wyoming. I expect that we will work together as professionals.”

Crandall said at his press conference that three people had resigned from WDE in the last seven days. “And we know of some people who will leave the day she starts. About six people.”

In the meantime, lawmakers drew a distinction between the Supreme Court ruling, which found SF104 unconstitutional, and the district court order, which would specify how the ruling will be enforced.

“We will follow any court order,” said Mary Throne (D-Cheyenne), the minority floor leader, at a press conference an hour after Hill spoke. “We respectfully suggest that the superintendent do the same and wait for a court order.”

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. RT, maybe you could enlighten me. Where in the Wyoming election code is a recall election authorized?

  2. “Now, Lemme see….Who was it that was gettin’ so goosed up about giving shootin’ irons to the Dept. of Ed. last month…Gosh, I forget……….”

  3. Some days you win, some days you lose. Some days you bite the bear and some days the bear bites your ass. Cindy Hill, no matter how you perceive her, won. Not pretty. Mud wrestling. Gator wrestling. She won. The idea of stripping a constitutionally endowed office of its powers by a group determined to punish an obnoxious occupant of said office was brain dead. Should we abolish the office of the governor because we don’t like him? Or her? The remedy for having a perceived incompetent person as an occupant of public office is recall. Justice Thurgood Marshall told me that during a Supreme Court hearing in 1983. Actually he was confused at the time but the message still resonates.
    Why should our Legislature waste money on a special session in order to revisit the mistakes of the past? Drop it. Cindy won the election and won the court battle. She won. Give it up. Let your constiituents decide if they want to recall her. Since she has made the amazingly cocksure decision to run for Governor, she will not be at the Dept. of Education for long anyway.
    Nightmare scenario: 2016 ticket for President: Sarah Palin and Cindy Hill.