Wyoming’s top environmental office has approved a “section 401” water quality certificate for Black Canyon Hydro’s controversial Seminoe pumped water storage hydroelectric project in Carbon County.

It’s the largest state-level permitting milestone for the project, which still awaits final approval from federal regulatory agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued the certificate Thursday, underscoring its intent to, among other things, maintain the viability of the world-class Miracle Mile trout fishery. The cherished stretch of the North Platte River is immediately downstream of the Kortes and Seminoe Reservoir dams, and it’s designated as an Outstanding Resource Water.

That designation, according to DEQ, requires “no further degradation from human activity,” resulting in stringent thresholds and triggers that are “enforceable conditions of the certification” and could curb the facility’s operations if exceeded.

Though he was still reading through the 19-page certificate and 115-page “adaptive management plan,” Trout Unlimited’s Patrick Harrington said he’s generally pleased with the DEQ’s effort to solicit public comments and incorporate much of that feedback into its ongoing oversight of water quality related to the project.

A boat navigates the narrows above Seminoe Reservoir’s Kortes Dam in 2015. (Ryan Dorgan/WyoFile)

“There were modest improvements, which is good,” Harrington told WyoFile on Friday. “There are still big picture things missing, like a full operational shutdown, which is something that we explicitly asked for.”

The primary water quality concerns, according to DEQ and many stakeholders involved in the process, are turbidity from daily water flushing operations and the potential to raise water temperatures — especially in the Miracle Mile. Trout are a cold-water species and particularly sensitive to warmer temperatures. Groups like Trout Unlimited and Friends of the North Platte have warned that even one day of higher-than-tolerable water temperatures could result in a devastating fish kill.

It appears the state will impose temporary operational shutdown triggers when the Miracle Mile is susceptible to high water temperatures, Harrington noted. The Miracle Mile — and nearly every river and stream in Wyoming — are particularly vulnerable to trout-killing temps when flows are low and atmospheric temperatures are higher than average.

But the state mostly relied on historic water temperature variability data from a decade ago, Harrington said, and the outlook for the Upper North Platte River system has changed significantly since then. Scientific analysis has flagged the region as particularly susceptible to a warming climate — and that’s playing out in real time this year.

This map depicts the Seminoe pumped water storage hydroelectric project area. (Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality)

Wyoming just experienced its warmest winter in modern history, and its snowpack has been beyond dismal, including for regions draining into the North Platte River and its tributaries, according to local meteorologists and water watchers. In fact, the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office in February issued a “priority administration” order restricting diversions from the North Platte River and its tributaries from Guernsey Reservoir all the way upstream beyond Pathfinder Reservoir.

The federal Bureau of Reclamation is monitoring a situation that will likely require prescribed reservoir releases this year to meet legal water delivery protocols downstream.

“Both the mountains and the lower elevations in the [North Platte River] basin have had a scarcity of precipitation,” Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Elizabeth Smith told WyoFile on Friday. “Snowpack is well below average, and the Upper North Platte Basin is in severe drought.”

Though dire and sure to cause a lot of pain for agriculture, fishing-reliant tourism businesses and municipalities — which are first in line ordered to shut off their North Platte River spigots, the Engineer’s Office has noted — Harrington said it’s an opportunity for DEQ to collect fresh data to potentially redial some of its water quality triggers for the project.

“They do talk about recalibrating the water quality model,” he said. “If that monitoring starts sooner rather than later, maybe we will capture some of that [data] and we’ll have a little bit more confidence” in DEQ’s adaptive management plan.

A stretch of the Miracle Mile on the North Platte River in Wyoming. (AJ Schroetlin/FlickrCC)

The state’s certificate is proof that the project will not impose any significant environmental threats, company spokesperson Brad Carl told WyoFile.

“It confirms that the project will comply with all water quality standards and establishes robust regulatory protections to ensure that there will be no impacts to the Seminoe and Kortes reservoirs or the Miracle Mile,” Carl said.

Water battery

“Pumped water storage” involves pumping water uphill during daytime “off-peak demand” hours for electricity when wind and solar power are plentiful and wholesale electricity is cheapest. The water is released to generate hydroelectricity during higher-demand hours in the evening.

Black Canyon Hydro, a subsidiary of Utah-based rPlus Hydro, proposes building a 13,400-acre-foot reservoir in the Bennett Mountains overlooking Seminoe Reservoir near the dam — one of several reservoirs on the North Platte River.

The massive $3 billion to $5 billion project would serve as an “energy‑storage facility,” the company told WyoFile. “Think of it as a ‘water battery’ that stores energy generated when demand is low. When demand increases, water is released from the upper reservoir back into Seminoe, driving hydroelectric turbines to produce electricity.”

Wider concerns, and assurances

In addition to criticism from national and local outdoor recreation groups, the Casper City Council joined their Natrona and Carbon county colleagues in voicing concerns over the project. In addition to potential impacts to fisheries and aquatic life, they say it threatens important elk, mule deer and sage grouse habitat, as well as a vital bighorn sheep herd — all huge revenue draws to the region.

The estimated five-year construction timeline is a particular concern for the land-based resources because the company has asked federal regulatory officials for several exemptions to seasonal construction restrictions typically imposed to protect wildlife.

For its part, rPlus Hydro said it is committed to conforming both the construction and operation of the facility to minimize impacts.

“These [DEQ water quality] protections reflect our longstanding commitment to developing energy infrastructure in a manner that respects and preserves Wyoming’s natural resources while supporting the state’s economic future,” Carl, the rPlus spokesman, told WyoFile.

Click here to learn more about FERC’s review of the project.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. “The state’s certificate is proof that the project will not impose any significant environmental threats, company spokesperson Brad Carl told WyoFile. “It confirms that the project will comply with all water quality standards and establishes robust regulatory protections to ensure that there will be no impacts to the Seminoe and Kortes reservoirs or the Miracle Mile,” Carl said.” After having spent 30 years with DEQ, I’m still laughing/crying at this statement. The “state certificate” proves that the numbers submitted by the company fall within the parameters of the water quality regulations, period. The quality of the numbers is suspect, as noted in the article, but WQD (staff) are limited by statute/regulation and pro-development management/government. I suspect the water quality and wildlife will pay the ultimate price in the long run. I saw no information regarding whether this is an energy positive system or project, I have my doubts, since past pump-back proposals I’ve seen could not met a net positive energy production. Wildlife exemptions speaks volumes about the company’s commitment to the environment and their future impacts on it. And finally, I saw no mention related to the significant increases in evaporation that will occur with the increased acreage of exposed surface water, not to mention the other points of water loss throughout a pumping system. This project is good for rPlus Hydro and horrible for Wyoming.

  2. While a helpful article, it failed to point out the sole purpose for this project is to store Green energy from wind farms near Medicine Bow and use this “water battery” to return that electricity when the wind isn’t blowing. Also, a couple minor errors in your photo captions. The dam in Dorgan’s photos is Seminoe Dam, not Kortes, and Schroetlin’s photo also shows the same part of Seminoe Reservoir, not the Miracle Mile, which starts a few miles lower below Kortes Dam (see the DEQ map in the article). While water quality is a major issue, others include impacts on an important bighorn sheep herd, recreation, and also sage grouse (from the new powerlines needed to connect to the windfarms).

  3. Good explanation, Dustin. Thank you.
    Mr. Carl of rPlus Hydro, the developer, assures us that the company “…is committed to conforming both the construction and operation of the facility to minimize impacts.” But, at the same time, the company has asked federal regulators to exempt it from “…several exemptions to seasonal construction restrictions typically imposed to protect wildlife.” How is this not a contradiction? Perhaps Mr. Carl is unaware of his company’s request. If you get a chance, Dustin, would you please ask him about this?
    One more thing: does Wyoming Game and Fish Department get to weigh in on this project?

  4. Why even have a state DEQ? They’ve proved time and time again in the oil patch that water quality is not a priority.

  5. I have to admit that my gut reaction to this project is “Don’t mess with the Miracle Mile”.
    But beyond that, and please correct me if I’m wrong, I haven’t seen a compelling case made that the electricity that would be produced is actually needed, beyond the hand waving that more energy means more jobs, etc. Or if it is needed, that it can’t be provided by other means that would not risk damage to this unique fishery and ecosystem.

    My takeaway is therefore that this is an unnecessary money-making project that many are opposed to. Why is it still being considered?

  6. Evidently very little concern for the state’s healthiest Big Horn sheep population.