The dual pressures of climate change and ever-increasing demand for water has brought a new sense of urgency to a decades-old idea: to dam the Green River just upstream of the Warren Bridge in Sublette County, close to its glacial source.

But the idea still faces decades-old challenges. Studies by the Wyoming Water Development Office staff indicate that the cost of the project – which includes new and improved canal systems over difficult terrain – outweigh the economic benefits for the irrigators.

It is this analysis, according to the agency, that makes it highly unlikely the dam and irrigation proposal would meet the “purpose and need” criteria under the federal Clean Water Act.

“Building a reservoir is a wonderful thing. … We need storage, we need customers, but we don’t need this project,” Wyoming Water Development Commission Director Mike Purcell said last week during a joint meeting of the commission and Select Water Committee in Casper.

The commission and Select Water Committee on Friday declined a request by a group of Green River Valley irrigators and county officials for $750,000 needed to collect drill-core samples and conduct other feasibility work.

Randy Bolgiano, member of the Upper Green River Irrigation board, argued in favor of the project. Bolgiano said he and his fellow irrigators are deeply troubled to see large volumes of un-appropriated water flow out of state each spring.

The proposal also faces opposition based on how the dam and reservoir might drastically alter recreation in the area. The Warren Bridge area of the Green River is a premier fishery and destination for river floaters.

“A dam there would destroy a portion of that river,” and change the downstream characteristics, said commissioner William Resor of Wilson. “From a recreation point of view, I don’t think it’s a good thing to do.”

Yet Resor said he’d still oppose the dam proposal based solely on the irrigation portion of the cost and benefit analysis.

“I don’t think it’s going to do for irrigation what we’d like it to do,” Resor said.

Supporters of the dam argue that the reservoir itself would provide additional recreational opportunities and only increase the amount of tourism dollars spent in the area. They say it would improve the fishery by moderating the downstream flow.

Preliminary designs call for a dam 1,000 feet long and 140 feet to 150 feet high located in “The Narrows” portion of the river, creating a reservoir of about 80,000 acre-feet. Local irrigators say the hydroelectric resource created by the reservoir could generate 3-21 megawatts of power.

“It would be possible to produce hydrogen for future transportation fuel cell markets and clean energy market potential,” said Al Radke of Pinedale.

Radke and other supporters say they’re not giving up. There are many other potential sources of money to launch the project, including federal stimulus funds.

Supporters believe a thorough feasibility study would convince the federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of the need for the project. Sublette County irrigators say they need a reservoir far upstream from the Fontenelle Reservoir in Lincoln County.

“The riparian nature (of the Upper Green River Valley) is not sustainable, so the basin will eventually dry up,” said Bolgiano.

For more on the Green River dam proposal, check out this article “Green River Dam Up For Vote” in the Jackson Hole Daily.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *