A pronghorn doe grazes between abandoned worker housing in Jeffrey City. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

A pronghorn doe enjoys the quiet of Jeffrey City on a Saturday afternoon. She is taking her time grazing in the space between abandoned worker housing built for long-gone uranium miners.

One nearby building bears the faded sign “Bachelor Apt. #1.” Young men may have used this same spot to escape the confines of company housing and laze in the sun between shifts at the uranium mines. You could get any drug you wanted in Jeffrey City back then, and there wasn’t much to do, one former mine worker told a historian.

In 1979, at the height of life for uranium mines in the surrounding hills, there were 4,500 people here, according to western historian John Egan. The company Western Nuclear spent $1.5 million on worker housing, Egan wrote. Other businesses blossomed off the mine workers, but uranium was the town’s raison d’etre, and its Achilles heel.

Jeffrey City died a quick and somewhat violent death starting in the 1980s, Egan writes. As the uranium industry tanked, layoffs were accompanied by vandalism to the school, sabotage of electrical lines to the mines and bullets fired through car windows. Politicians blamed the federal government, regulation, and what they called unfounded worries about nuclear power.

Did you enjoy this photo? Support WyoFile at Old Bill’s Fun Run

A Presidential election created brief hope:

“Ronald Reagan’s victory over President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential election was heralded by the Jeffrey City News as a return to nuclear power,” Egan wrote. “But political rhetoric could not overturn the realities of the market.” The mines did not recover, and as layoffs continued, radioactivity was discovered in some of the worker housing.

During the rest of the 80s, the townsfolk largely packed up and left, Egan wrote. There were 58 residents counted in the 2010 census — excluding pronghorn.

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *