Last fall, Grand Teton National Park employees loaded thousands of whitebark pine seedlings onto the backs of mules, then hiked them up Paintbrush Canyon. There, they dug small holes and planted the young trees in places where they had the best shot at reaching adulthood.

They were not ordinary whitebark pines, whose seeds already travel around Greater Yellowstone in the mouths of Clark’s nutcrackers. Instead, these trees had been carefully selected for their resistance to an introduced disease called white pine blister rust.

Planting these seedlings was part of a massive project beginning in 2013 to plant disease-resistant whitebark pines throughout the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. White pine blister rust along with mountain pine beetles have killed large swaths of whitebark forests in recent years, leading the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to designate the hardy tree as a federally threatened species in 2022.

To bring back the pine, the U.S. Forest Service, along with nonprofits and other federal agencies, have developed a pipeline to plant thousands of whitebark pines with innate resistance to blister rust in Greater Yellowstone each year. But while the effort to bring rust-resistance to the GYE is well underway, some people wonder if the planned reorganization of Forest Service could put the decades-long project in jeopardy.

“The decline [in whitebark pine] is solvable,” said Libby Pansing, a forest scientist at American Forests, a 151-year-old forest conservation organization. “We have the tools and the ability to solve this problem.”

Map of the ratio of whitebark pine trees within each study area as alive, dead, or infected with blister rust infection from surveys 2012-2015. (National Park Service)

Whitebark pines grow at high elevations throughout the western United States. Each fall, the trees produce a crop of fatty pine nuts that feed bears and birds alike. But throughout the Rocky Mountains, the trees have been dying off en masse, succumbing to white pine blister rust and mountain pine beetle outbreaks that many attribute to climate change. One study found that, as of 2016, the United States contained more dead whitebark pines than live ones.

Diana Tomback, a forest ecologist at the University of Colorado-Denver, has watched the tree’s decline with concern. In 2001, she helped start the Whitebark Pine Ecosystem Foundation, which has funded multiple research and restoration projects.

“The major threat to whitebark pine, if you read the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s species status assessment is white pine blister rust,” Tomback said of the disease that arrived in the U.S. accidentally on infected trees shipped from Europe. “It is a non-native disease that was introduced to the United States.”

A blister rust-resistant whitebark pine seedling grows in Idaho. (Coeur d’Alene Nursery/U.S. Forest Service)

The process for finding trees that are resistant to blister rust, Tomback says, is long. Foresters look for healthy whitebark pines growing areas where the disease is widespread, a sign that the tree might have specific genes that help it fight off a blister rust infection. They then put cages around the tree’s developing pinecones to keep hungry animals out.  As the cones ripen, the foresters return to collect the ripe cones and take them to a Forest Service nursery where workers extract the seeds and plant them in tiny pots.

As the seedlings grow, nursery workers deliberately infect the seedlings with blister rust and closely monitor them for any symptoms of the disease. At about 2 years old, if the trees have not shown signs of a blister rust infection, they are ready for planting.

Each year, the Forest Service nursery in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, sends roughly 5,000 of these disease-resistant seedlings to Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks, according to Laura Jones, a plant ecologist for Grand Teton. Yet they form just a small fraction of the overall planting operation. 

The Coeur d’Alene Nursery shipped nearly 290,000 rust-resistant seedlings to national forests and national parks across Greater Yellowstone between 2021 and 2025, said Chandra Neils, the nursery’s superintendent.

“Our beneficial impact is not in replacing all that is lost, but in conserving the genetics that are needed to help the plants get through recovery and persist.”

Laura Jones, plant ecologist, Grand Teton national park

But even hundreds of thousands of seedlings can only cover a small fraction of the whitebark pine’s range. “It’s too big to replant it all,” Jones said. “Our beneficial impact is not in replacing all that is lost, but in conserving the genetics that are needed to help the plants get through recovery and persist.”

Percentage of surveyed whitebark pine trees that are still alive, based on surveys conducted between 2007 and 2016. (U.S. Forest Service)

In Greater Yellowstone, blister rust is not the only threat facing whitebark pines. Mountain pine beetles have also killed large numbers of the tree. Unlike blister rust, however, whitebark pines have persisted through mountain pine beetle outbreaks for millenia. Research suggests, however, that the warming climate is increasing the frequency and severity of their assaults.

“We do have historical evidence that says that there have been very large [pine beetle] outbreaks before,” Pansing said. “But there is also some research that suggests that it is tied to climate change, and that we should expect to see more outbreaks because of increasing temperatures.”

A 2025 Forest Service study projected that climate change will shrink whitebark pine habitat 80 percent by 2050.

For his master’s thesis at Montana State University, data scientist Stephen Huysman identified high-elevation spots in Greater Yellowstone where water tends to collect. Not only do the precious rust-resistant seedlings have a higher chance of surviving in these sites, he said, but they are also more likely to continue supporting whitebark pines in a warmer, drier future. Huysman has been using his findings to help Grand Teton and Yellowstone decide where to plant their trees.

While whitebark pine restoration is well underway in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, its continuation is not guaranteed. In March, the Forest Service released details of its restructuring plan, which called for replacing its regional offices with state offices and closing many of its experimental forests. While there are no current plans to shutter the Coeur d’Alene Nursery, some details of the reorganization have not yet been released. The uncertainty has many scientists working with the species nervous.

“The Park Service and the BLM send all of their seeds that they collect from potentially resistant trees to Forest Service nurseries and to Forest Service screening centers,” Pansing said. “If that infrastructure falls, that entire part of our ability to restore whitebark pine fails.”

Mark DeGraff is a freelance environmental journalist. He graduated from the University of California, Santa Cruz in 2025 with a master's degree in science communication.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Please keep us updated on the fate of this program with the new restructuring program. This is a very important project and I hope it continues.