The sun sets over an oil well pumpjack in the Powder River Basin.(Jeremy Buckingham, Flickr Creative Commons)

by Manuel Quiñones, E&E reporter

Originally published by E&E April 15, 2015, and republished here with permissions — Ed.

Environmental groups are urging the Interior Department and its Bureau of Land Management to heed the threat of climate change when finalizing a new resource management plan for almost 800,000 acres in Wyoming.

The Buffalo area resource management plan has been years in the making and would set the parameters for future development of the state’s energy-rich counties of Campbell, Johnson and Sheridan.

While mining and drilling companies would like to keep the region as open to development as possible, environmental groups say BLM’s plan could end up generating more than 15 billion tons of carbon pollution.

“On behalf of our millions of members, we reiterate our call that you reject the Buffalo RMP revision in its current form,” a list of groups wrote Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and BLM Director Neil Kornze today.

The groups, which sent a similar letter last year, said new information about the threat of climate change made it important for them to follow up. Plus, review of the RMP may soon wrap up.

A 2013 draft plan presented what BLM called a compromise between environmental protection and resource extraction. It would set aside eight special recreation management areas and three areas of critical environmental concern, plus call for putting more than 100,000 acres off-limits to new development.

Still, greens say greenhouse gas emissions from the Buffalo area cost more than $400 million in economic harm per year, based on the controversial social cost of carbon calculation. Add to that more than $50 billion for burning the coal, oil and gas produced.

BLM is in the process of developing a guidance document for how its regulators should address climate concerns and apply a social cost of carbon calculation to National Environmental Policy Act reviews (Greenwire, April 15).

Jewell has also spoken about the importance of discussing fossil fuel development in the context of ongoing climate concerns and Obama administration regulatory plans.

The groups wrote today, “Given its long-term and significant implications in terms of locking in BLM to decades of federal coal, oil, and gas development and corresponding climate impacts, the Buffalo RMP is an appropriate place to start that conversation.”

Flickr photo from Jeremy Buckingham used with a Creative Commons license.

Twitter: @ManuelQ | Email: mquinones@eenews.net

SUPPORT: If you enjoyed this story produced by Environment & Energy, please consider supporting WyoFile. WyoFile pays a subscription fee to E&E for the right to bring E&E stories to our readers — Ed.

 

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *