House Education Committee amends bill to step back from Common Core

The House Education Committee heard testimony on House Bill 97 until 7 p.m. Monday. (WyoFile/Gregory Nickerson — click to enlarge) — The House Education Committee heard testimony on House Bill 97 until after 7 p.m. Monday. (WyoFile/Gregory Nickerson — click to enlarge)

February 18, 2014

The House Education Committee passed an amended version of House Bill 97, which would change the way the state of Wyoming adopts educational standards and remove the state from the Common Core State Standards and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.

The bill will now return to the House for debate. In order to become law, it would need to pass through the Senate Education Committee and then pass three votes in the Senate.

Members of the public offering testimony included Bill Schilling of the Wyoming Business Alliance, Amy Edmonds of the Wyoming Liberty Group, and a number of teachers, school board members, and parents.

A primary concern among supporters of the bill was that the Common Core increases federal overreach into Wyoming’s education system. “Wyoming residents do not want decisions about the education of our children to be made by the government,” said one member of the public who testified. “The people of Wyoming know what is best for our children. We do not need the government telling us what is best for us. The people will make those decisions for ourselves.”

Hollis Hackman, a school board member from Sheridan District 2, spoke against the bill. He felt the measure would cause disruption by changing direction on the implementation the Common Core standards, which his been in progress in his district for four years.

Several members of the committee had similar concerns. “I realize there is great passion behind this issue,” said Rep. Albert Sommers (R-Pinedale). “I talked to all the people I know who are educators — I’m not an educator, I’m just a cowboy — and they said (the Common Core standards) are better standards than we had previously.” He said that local school boards in his district have not asked him to change direction.

Sommers commented that the bill is three bills in one, with aspects on data security, assessments, and standards. He said he believes that discussion on the issue might be better as an interim topic.

Rep. John Freeman (D-Green River) opposed the bill and suggested an interim study. “I think we should leave the Common Core alone because school districts need stability and predictability, and I’m not backing off from that because that’s what people have been telling me all along,” he said.

Rep. Patton (R-Sheridan), also supported an interim study, saying it would be a better way to assimilate the wide variety of opinions on the issue. “The one thing I don’t like is being singled out and told you don’t support my interests. We are not like milk. We are not homogeneous. … We get something that alarms us and we react quickly. … If we are going to do this at all I think we should do it in the interim.”

Rep. Jerry Paxton (R-Encampment) spoke in favor of House Bill 97, though he had reservations about its length and complexity. “I don’t know that we want to wait another year. I’m in favor of moving something forward.” Rep. Hans Hunt (R-Newcastle) agreed that the bill is imperfect and would need to be worked. “While it would be good to work on this as an interim topic, I fear what would happen with Common Core sinking in more deeply,” he said.

House Education Committee chair Rep. Matt Teeters (R-Lingle) also spoke in favor of hearing the bill. After receiving a motion and a second to work the bill, Teeters made a motion to strike the data portion of the bill, saying including it would leave the bill with too many moving parts. The motion passed.

Rep. Sommers then read in 16 pages of amendments, which the committee worked until 8:40 p.m.

“After hearing more than 45 minutes of amendments, I am even more convinced that this (committee) is not the right venue,” said Rep. Cathy Connolly (D-Laramie). She said she would vote no and support an interim study. Rep. Sommers speculated that the bill will die in the Senate and that the issue will likely become an interim study.

In final voting of the amended bill, Rep. Patton, Rep. Connolly, and Rep. Freeman voted no. Representatives Teeters, Sommers, Paxton, Hunt, Northrup, and Piiparinen voted in favor of the bill. The measure passed and will now go back to the House.

“We spent almost four hours on the bill,” said Rep. Teeters. “If you don’t think your citizen legislature works, come to a committee meeting.”

Amy Edmonds testifies in support of #wyleg House Bill 97 to change how state adopts education standards. pic.twitter.com/smtirEpkUg

— Gregory Nickerson (@GregNickersonWY) February 18, 2014

— Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. He writes the Capitol Beat blog. Contact him at greg@wyofile.com.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.