Members of the Wyoming Republican Party waited for the public to depart their Sept. 17, 2022 meeting in Riverton before entering into executive session. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

It has become a predictable annual event, like the first tourist getting tossed ass over teacup by a Yellowstone buffalo. It is the “free space” on the Cowboy State’s political bingo card. I am, of course, talking about the Wyoming Republican Party getting into an intramural food fight, and then coming to the government of Wyoming to sort things out.

Opinion

I see that the Wyoming Republican Party is suing itself again in our state courts, this time over credentials in the state Central Committee leadership elections. The attorney for the GOP went so far as to say that, since the party is a private organization, it doesn’t need to abide by Wyoming statutes or pay attention to Wyoming Supreme Court decisions.

The irony in this situation is thick as harness leather.

At the risk of repeating myself, I’ll repeat myself. The sovereign State of Wyoming needs to cut the apron strings that bind political parties to state government. The Wyoming Legislature should go through Title 22, our election code, with a fine-toothed comb, and pluck out any reference to political parties contained therein.

It makes absolutely no sense to have laws on our books that govern the internal workings of private organizations like political parties, and then have those parties ignore the law. The State of Wyoming doesn’t tell the Rotary Club how to conduct its internal elections, any more than it tells the Elks Club what to include on its buffet menu.

Political parties, like service clubs or lodges, are private membership organizations and should be allowed to conduct their business by their own rules. Government has no place monkeying around in them, unless their rituals involve human sacrifice or fissionable material.

Private political parties should also stand on their own two feet, and not come running to government to referee their frat-house pissing matches. When they resort to appealing to government to settle their internal differences, political parties make themselves look like weak little wards of the state who can’t handle disputes among themselves, instead of the proud paragons of political thought that they like to call themselves.

Here, as I see it, is the only nexus between political parties in Wyoming and government. The parties can, if they choose to do so, submit a slate of candidates to the Secretary of State and county clerks for inclusion on the general election ballot. Once that is done, the relationship is over. Basta. Finito. End of story.

How the parties derive those names should be totally up to them. There is no need for government to conduct primary elections at public expense to accommodate private organizations such as political parties.

If the Democrats want to have an axe-throwing tournament to choose their candidates, then so be it. If the Republicans want to conduct a swimsuit competition to choose theirs, fine and dandy. It is not government’s business to interfere.

And this nonsense about the parties controlling vacant seats in government by submitting three names to the governor for selection needs to go! Those seats belong to the citizens of Wyoming, not to any political party. If a seat becomes vacant, then a special election should be held to fill it. Let voters decide, not party hacks.

Political parties are useless appendages on our body politic. They have meaning only to their members and, outside that small circle, they only offer entertainment value to the rest of us.

Wyoming’s state lawmakers would do everyone a favor if they’d re-read Madison’s cautionary advice about political factions in the Federalist Papers #10, then take a chainsaw to our election code. Free the parties to be the private outfits they want to be, and liberate the rest of us from their partisan goofiness.

Selah.

Columnist Rod Miller is a Wyoming native, raised on his family's cattle ranch in Carbon County. He graduated from Rawlins High School, home of the mighty Outlaws, where he was named Outstanding Wrestler...

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Preach, brother!

    We need a new Declaration of Independents to reclaim American rights. Real people need independence from the United States of Political Parties.

  2. For anyone interested in this conversation, the Corporations, Elections, and Political Subdivisions will have this conversation at it’s next meeting in August in Casper. Provide public comment at that time if you think it should happen.

  3. I agree with Rod that the “Political parties are useless appendages on our body politic.” That might explain why there were not established, or even mentioned, in the U.S. Constitution. I also agree with his statement that “It makes absolutely no sense to have laws on our books that govern the internal workings of private organizations like political parties…”

    But it also makes absolutely no sense that these private clubs are allowed to choose for us the candidates who appear on our ballots. This is the problem with the nexus that Rod describes. It amounts to us contracting out to private clubs the selection of finalists from whom the citizens choose. Unfortunately, the contractors are not competent and come with all the defects Madison described in factions in Federalist no. 10. This, and our closed primary system, all but guarantee that the best two candidates will not appear on the general ballot.

    The real solution is to no longer accept the nexus that Rod describes. Parties, as private clubs, should be allowed to support candidates who share their interests. But they should not be allowed to select, through the taxpayer-funded primaries, their club’s slate for inclusion on our ballot. In my mind, elimination of that “nexus” and an open, nonpartisan primary system would be the solution.

    1. You nailed it Mike. Anyone who wants to run for office submits their name, no part affiliation, no party interference. Of course, it will never happen because voters would then have to educate themselves on issues and candidates because there would be no cheat code to tell them how to vote.

  4. Republicans choosing their candidates through a swimsuit competition. The mere thought of Hageman, Lummis, Barrasso, or Chuck Gray in a swimsuit runs shivers down my spine.
    Thanks for another good one Rod.

      1. Sorry you feel that way Larry.

        MAGA isn’t making this country great, it’s pulled people like yourself so far to the right that logic and common sense doesn’t matter anymore. This tribal stuff needs to stop.

        I used to be a Republican when it was truly a party of law and order and proudly cast my vote for people like Al Simpson, Craig Thomas, Matt Mead, and Liz Cheney. I also voted for a good number of fine people in the Democratic party as well along the way.

        My hope is that individuals such as yourself will eventually wake up to the fact that you’ve been conned into believing Donald Trump and the MAGA movement truly care about this country, it’s people, it’s constitution, it’s laws, and it’s standing in the world. Open your mind sir, look outside of the bubble you’re in, and you will find that it’s the Democrats, Independents, and moderate Republicans who are the true Americans at this point in history, and they are anything but “anti-American”. Please don’t take this as an insult because it certainly wasn’t meant that way, from one American to another.

      2. Larry, Republicans choose candidates b who can give away the most to oil, gas and ag. Tie breaker is who can interfere in our private lives the most.

  5. Shouldn’t there be a line between a party’s internal governance and election processes for their internal leadership vs party candidate selections for government positions within our Representative form of government? Isn’t ‘party affiliation’ at the government elected office level supposed to help voters understand what positions and values each candidate holds, at least in general terms? Stuff like ‘party platforms’ that members align to and abide by type things, right?

    OK, let’s erase all political party affiliations completely. Then maybe we can also erase the election process too and just cut to the chase scene. Whoever can attract the most donation dollars for each position wins. No holds barred. That would take care of all this pesky ‘election integrity’ nonsense too.

  6. Damn. I actually agree with you, Rod. I guess there’s a first time for everything! 🙏

  7. This sounds like an excellent solution. Right now government officials are retiring and leaving a vacancy that is filled by hand picking successors. While this often makes sure competent people fill the slot, it also reeks of good old boy politics. Rod is right. If slots are open, let the people elect successors. It is their right.