Gov. Matt Mead proposes to dip into "rainy day" savings in his budget proposal. Lawmakers should reject spending from savings, writes guest columnist Maureen Bader. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)
Maureen Bader
Maureen Bader

(Opinion) — Wyoming stands at a fork in the road. Throughout the 2000s, politicians played Santa Claus with a severance tax bonanza. Saving some of that windfall in a variety of savings accounts mitigated this pork-fest.

Now, as the minerals boom turns to bust, many of our elected representatives look covetously at those savings as a way to shield themselves from the difficult choices involved in limiting government to a level remaining taxpayers can afford to fund.

Instead of looking for ways to reduce government spending to match the revenue reality, Gov. Matt Mead’s current budget proposal takes us down the wrong road.

The governor’s budget rehashes his old strategy with a twist. As his call to raid the Rainy Day Fund failed last time, his call this time includes a provision to pay the fund back. But this provision, however imaginative, merely steals from Peter to pay Paul. Gov. Mead plans not to raid, but to borrow — temporarily — from the Rainy Day Fund. The money to pay the Rainy Day Fund back will come from money that would have gone into the Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund, the legacy savings account set up to protect future generations once the mineral industry is gone forever.

Instead of putting difficult decisions off to a later day, the legislature must decline to make the change to W.S. 39-14-801(b) that would allow this diversion from the PWMTF and instead bring spending down to a level Wyoming taxpayers can afford.

The Consensus Revenue Estimating Group projected general fund revenue to fall to $2.09 billion and the Budget Reserve Account revenue to fall to $850 million in the 2017/18 biennium. This means the money available for government operations is $3.045 billion. This is what the governor has available to spend to keep government running.

The governor presented an operating budget of $3.016 billion, amply covering government operations and leaving about $30 million extra.

The governor’s spending wish list totals an additional $488.5 million. But wait! We only have an extra $30 million! Where is this extra going to come from? You guessed it — the Rainy Day Fund.

What is so important that hard-earned savings must be sacrificed? To start, more spending, $153 million more, on capital construction.

Like what?

For starters, the governor wants another $37.5 million to continue turning Wyoming’s Capitol into a Taj Mahal. The governor also wants to spend another $50 million on buildings at the University of Wyoming. Both the Capitol renovation and the building boom at UW require a review, as taxpayers cannot afford to fund pork barrel spending any longer.

Besides more buildings, what else is indispensable? The gas tax grab a couple of years ago just wasn’t big enough to create a long-term source of funding for roads — go figure — so the governor wants to grab $25 million from the Rainy Day Fund to fund road maintenance.

Oh brother. What else?

In addition to its standard budget of $25 million, Gov. Mead wants the Wyoming Department of Tourism to get another $3 million from the Rainy Day Fund for international market expansion. While it is true, tourism is important to the state, and yes, advertising works, industries should pay for their own advertising, and savings should not be used to pay for jet-setting trips for bureaucrats.

It wasn’t all bad news. Programs funded by the tobacco settlement fund, unsurprisingly, were costing more than the revenue available to pay for them. Gov. Mead said it is time to evaluate these programs — they must contract — and he recommended a reduction of $12 million, almost covering the deficit of $14 million. Too bad we didn’t see more of this elsewhere.

The governor’s budget is the first of three steps in the budgeting process. In step two, the Joint Appropriations Committee reviews the governor’s budget then the budget will be debated on the floors of the House and Senate. Like last year, let’s hope the Legislature reduces, if not eliminates, Gov. Mead’s spending wish list but this time creates an environment of real and sustained spending reductions. Otherwise our children and grandchildren will be left with a legacy of debt and higher taxes.

— Maureen Bader is a policy advisor for the Wyoming Liberty Group.

— Columns are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact WyoFile editor-in-chief Dustin Bleizeffer at

Leave a comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *