Medicaid expansion dies in committee without a vote (probably)

By Ron Feemster
— February 19, 2014

In two different meetings, the Senate Labor Health Committee heard two and a half hours of testimony on the last remaining Medicaid expansion bill today. But Sen. Charles Scott, chairman of the committee, never called for a vote.

And now it looks like he won’t. Unless he changes his mind.

Medicaid expansion would cover at federal government expense some 17,600 people who are not eligible to buy subsidized insurance on the health insurance exchange, but who also do not qualify for Medicaid under current rules. The bill would move from the committee to the floor with at least three votes. But three of five committee members had already voted against the bill when it was introduced.

If, however, no vote were held, the bill would die in committee.

At three different times on Wednesday afternoon, Scott emerged from the Senate chambers to tell interested parties if and when Labor Health would take a vote. Twice he appeared to change his mind.

He first told WyoFile there was chance the committee might not vote on Senate File 118. At the time, he said the vote would probably happen at 8 a.m. Thursday.

“We might not have a meeting,” Scott said. “They voted the same thing down over in the House.”

In the House, when Senate File 118 was still in committee, the Rothfuss bill was proposed as a budget amendment. The House voted it down 27-29 in a standing vote, according to Dan Perdue, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association, who was in the House at the time.

“We came very close,” said Rep. Mary Throne (D-Cheyenne). “Last year we had nine votes. The eight Democrats and one Republican. I was hoping we would get to 31 votes. We were only four short.”

Later in the afternoon, Scott emerged again to tell members of the Wyoming Coalition for Medicaid Expansion that the vote was off. He was not going to convene the committee to vote on the bill. The coalition promptly issued a press release condemning the committee chairman for using Senate procedure to achieve his private goal of killing the bill.

“We have a chance to shore up the state’s health care system, including our community hospitals, by insuring thousands of people using federal dollars. It’s unfortunate that the committee turned its back on that opportunity this morning,” said Perdue in the release.

After the release had been sent out to journalists across the state, Scott emerged again to tell Ben Neary of the Associated Press that he was not planning to convene the committee on Wednesday night, but left the door open a crack for a vote on Thursday, the last day that bills can be reported out of committee.

“I don’t want to drag the committee through that,” he said, referring to a final meeting of a committee that was stacked against the bill 3-2 from the beginning. But in an interview that WyoFile participated in, he stopped short of saying the vote was definitely off.

Marguerite Herman, a member of the coalition, was incensed: “We took him at his word and we wrote the release,” Herman said. “Then he comes out again and says something else?”

The bill appears to be dead. But Medicaid expansion proposals are likely to resurface as budget amendments in both the House and the Senate on Friday.

“We’ll get another chance Friday,” Rothfuss said. “I’m glad that we will have an opportunity to debate and vote on the bill.”

Throne has said all along that she would not give up until she has exhausted all possibilities. She intends to amend the bill in a way that might help win the last four votes she needs for passage.

“It’s not quite a Hail Mary,” Throne said Wednesday near the end of the session. “We’ll have all day to talk to people tomorrow. It’s not over.”

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.

Medicaid expansion dies in committee without a vote (probably)

Leave a comment