In the summer of 2018, Foster Friess stepped off his private plane onto the blistering tarmac at the Casper/Natrona County International Airport. He had come that day to attend a meet-and-greet for gubernatorial candidates. My office hosted the event. Friess was a political newcomer and a last-minute entry into the race for governor. 

Opinion

An ultrawealthy businessman and Republican megadonor from Teton County, Friess had spent a lifetime growing his investment firm, ultimately managing more than $15.7 billion in assets. Now, at the age of 78, he was seeking Wyomingโ€™s shiniest acquisition: the governorโ€™s office. 

Outside of Teton County, he was an unknown, a stranger in a foreign land. Indeed, he told those gathered that day โ€” part boast, part confession โ€” that he had never been to Casper.

An uncomfortable chuckle followed. Natrona County is the second-largest voting block in the state. And yet. 

While the serious gubernatorial candidates had been in the trenches for years, serving on school boards, county commissions, working both sides of a paycheck, Fosterโ€™s pop-up campaign was friess-dried into 16 weeks, and hammered voters with mailers and media spots.  

I remember Fosterโ€™s entourage, young men in their shiny, slim-cut suits. I knew them to be not one of us. Only East Coast elites present with a sheen to their jib. Yet here they were, populating our towns that summer, stationed at the busiest intersections, pumping Friess campaign signs like barkers enticing us to an exotic carnival of the richest 1%. 

โ€œHeโ€™s got plenty of jack and heโ€™s using every cent of it,โ€ the late Sen. Alan Simpson told Politico at the time, โ€œweโ€™ll see if you can really buy a governorโ€™s race.โ€

Foster Friess came pretty doggone close. We didnโ€™t know him and, by his own admission, he was a stranger to us. Yet, in a blip, he spent more money than any candidate in the field, over $1.1 million. On Election Day, he came in second place to Mark Gordon. He also beat a lawyer from Goshen County with deep roots in the state named Harriet.  

Eight years later, Fosterโ€™s son, Steve Friess, is running for the GOP U.S. House seat and using the same playbook. This time, heโ€™s got even more jack, with $2.2 million in his campaign fund, doubling his fatherโ€™s effort. 

Will we fall for Friess 2.0? A recent FEC report showed that four of the six candidates in the Congressional race who reported their funding โ€” Friess, Reid Rasner, Chuck Gray and Frank Chapman (who has since dropped out) โ€” have contributed more than $1 million of their own funds. Contrast that with the campaigns of the other three candidates in the FEC database โ€” Jillian Balow, Bo Biteman, and David Giralt โ€” whose collective funding was overwhelmingly from individual contributors.

The primary is less than three weeks away. Given the crowded field, it does not take much to win a seat with a small percentage of the votes, and you can bet the wagons be โ€˜a circling. Depending on who you believe, Chuck Gray is leading in the polls, though his pollsterโ€™s math is fuzzy and the methodology questionable. 

Friess has spent more than the combined campaign funds of Balow, Giralt, and Biteman. Consequently, he may rise to the top not because we like him (heck, do we even know him?) but because he has the bread to beat Gray.

FEC reports show Friess has spent $1.5 million on mailers. His mailers are a constant, buggy presence in our home, like stealthy boxelders attracted to houses with western exposure. It is relentless and difficult to ignore.

I donโ€™t know about you, but we receive a Friess mailer almost every week, sometimes twice in the same week. A typical mailer sent to all registered Wyoming voters costs approximately $75,000. According to the 2025 U.S. Census, the median annual household income in Wyoming is $76,176.  Thatโ€™s a year’s worth of wages on our countertop. Every week. Headed for the trash.

How can our stateโ€™s favorite sons and daughters compete with that? How is it that our choices for the highest offices in our state are the candidates who capture our attention simply through their checkbook? 

The mailers keep coming. We may hate them. But the name sticks, the pledges and promises, enticing. We become candidate curious.  

Do they know us? Who has knocked on your door? Who have you met eyeball to eyeball? For those self-funders hovering over the masses, running shallow campaigns light on details and heavy on ego, is this campaign in the best interests of Wyoming or for the candidate, party of one?

Convince us youโ€™re a man of the people (why the men, always men). Do the moneyed know the cost of a gallon of milk? Do they know the price of a gallon of gas?? 

Perhaps it is naรฏve to lament the era of those dreamy, clear-eyed political hopefuls, those workaday chumps like the rest of us, who ran for office, not on the grease of their bank accounts or family wealth, but on the quality of their character and thoughtful plan for our future. 

Search thyself, my beloved Cowboy State: Are we suckers or sages?  

Foster Friess was a sleeper candidate who almost became our Executive in Chief. This time, itโ€™s on us. Do your homework, ask the most civically engaged person you know and get their thoughts. Call the candidate. Youโ€™ll know if they are the stuff of the high plains if they call back. Wyoming folk return calls. Donโ€™t be driven by cheap, fear-baiting images of hairy-bellied, middle-aged men on the pitch stalking your daughters, but because a candidate aligns with your values and belief system.

Straighten the spine, exercise one of the greatest freedoms in this country and head to the polls on Aug. 18. 

Itโ€™s time to arise.


Susan Stubson serves on WyoFileโ€™s board of directors. Neither she, nor any other member of the board, has the authority to direct or determine coverage. โ€”Ed.

Susan Stubson writes about faith, politics and issues facing the American West. She lives in Casper.

Join the Conversation

20 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name โ€” first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFileโ€™s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • Weโ€™re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on whatโ€™s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when theyโ€™re submitted โ€” or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. Weโ€™ll get to it when weโ€™re back in the office.
  • Weโ€™re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenterโ€™s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. Weโ€™ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If thatโ€™s going to upset you, itโ€™s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We donโ€™t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please donโ€™t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments โ€” maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. While I appreciate the article I sure wish Kevin Christensen had been mentioned as a serious candidate.

  2. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE KEVIN CHRISTIANSON OR DAVE GIRALT TAKE VOTES AWAY FROM THE BIG MONEY BACKED CANIDATES AND VOTE FOR A REGULAR HUMAN BEING TO REPRESENT WYOMING IN CONGRESS! I AM DISAP0INTED THAT MORE OF OUR NEIGHBORS ARE NOT INTERESTED TO DISCUSS THIS ISSUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR EFFORTS SUSAN.

  3. Thanks again Susan. The only question that needs asking is do you support Donald Trump or not. If the answer is yes or maybe that’s a definite no vote here. David Giralt is the only person who has come to our home. He’s a very nice, smart, and I believe honest guy but he hedged when I asked him that question. His answer was honest enough however when he said supporting Trump was his only way of competing against these others even though he didn’t agree with much of what this president is doing.

    1. Ditto. Giralt has knocked on my door twice (in 90 degree weather). Next gen future leader perhaps.

  4. great op-ed BUT, I think we all have realized for years that elections are bought. Wyoming is not above the fray, Susan, but we should be!

  5. Anyone that voted for dumpy-3times- is a sucker. A president thatโ€™s a 34 times felon and lies to all of us every single day. A man that has cost every family thousands of dollars every year but has enriched himself.

  6. Well said, my friend. This is a Rorschach test of the Wyoming soul. Itโ€™s gonna tell us way more about ourselves than it will about the candidates.

  7. Yes, thanks Susan – that’s the info I saw. Thank you for putting that out in the message – are we going to let that Happen?

  8. Susan, of course, is absolutely right. Do I have faith in the Wyoming voters? Only if we get more than the 25% who voted last time. I was sorry Susan did not mention Kevin Christensen or some of the other Wyomingites who didn’t have a rich daddy

  9. Thats good and honest information!
    Who are you putting your political weight behind BTW?

  10. Keep electing BILLIONARIES who are out of touch with the “working class” and think the economy is doing great and see how that works out. In the meantime my house insurance doubled, car insurance UP, water and electricity UP, my health care premiums UP, food way UP, and GAS DOUBLED since Jan 2025. Stock market is UP so good for you if you have a lot of stock.

  11. I managed to endure most of the 1st hour of the GOP debate for US House last night, before I lost my fight to suppress my gag reflex and had to turn it off. It had by that time already become obvious that we are soooo screwed! A couple of the candidates might have made tolerably decent representatives, but they have zero chance of winning the primary. Nope, it’s gonna be either Little Chucky Cheeseball, Frosted Fries Jr., Ruud Raisin or Beau Biter, and they are all cut from the same bolt of cloth – Trumpty kissing, FreeDumb Carcass MAGA twits. Yup, we are SO screwed!

  12. At the LWV candidate forum in Casper, the group was asked about the outsized influence of money in politics. I remember Friess saying, smiling, “Yes, and it will continue to be that way…” Susan is right. It’s time to arise. The system is corrupt. We have been sold out. Regular people have no representation. Time to take it back.

  13. ” but on the quality of their character and thoughtful plan for our future.”

    If only that were true but Chuck Gray proves that lying and daddy’s money will get you elected to a statewide office. One thing that is very abundant in this state is offspring with daddy’s money so cue the rush to get elected and grand stand in DC or Cheyenne. (see the Freedom Caucus and our Federal Delegation)

    If you tire of trash being delivered in the mail, then maybe you might stiffen your spine and become a Democrat, because the other party’s platform is trash, but apparently that is a bridge too far for the proud generational Wyoming Republicans.

    PS Most of the acolytes I met working for Foster wore t-shirts and a cross around their necks as the exited their vans to pass out the “trash”.

  14. Spot on Ms. Stubson. I fear that Wyoming voters do not do their homework before they mark their ballots. This is why our whole country is in the mess itโ€™s in. I challenge you voters, to take the time to know who and what you are voting for. The Ds and Rs after names mean nothing today. Vote for local commitment and integrity. Vote for a willingness to have an open mind to hear all sides of an issue before making a decision that is best for the constituents, not them personally. Vote for whatโ€™s good for Wyoming but keep in mind we are part of a larger entity and we should always want whatโ€™s best there as well. Itโ€™s very discouraging when big money comes in to buy us. What do they really want? Right now itโ€™s data centers and rare earth minerals among other things. And I say BEWARE. But do exercise your right to vote. Itโ€™s the only voice you have.

  15. Primary votes are more focused than general election voters.

    Dergenfelder & hageman are such strong candidates that balow & williams will be carried across the finish line.