WyoFile’s public records appeal in Two Elk case is denied

By Rone Tempest
— June 18, 2013

Citing ongoing concurrent investigations by the Inspector General and the Department of Justice, the federal Department of Energy has denied a WyoFile public records appeal for details about the suspension of the $9.9 million Two Elk stimulus project in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin.

WyoFile had requested information related to Two Elk developer North American Power Group, Greenwood Village, Colorado; North American president Michael J. Ruffatto and Wyoming-based North American Power vice president Brad Enzi.

The original request, filed under the federal Freedom of Information Act, was denied on April 23 by R. Paul Detwiler, chief counsel for the DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory that supervises the Two Elk carbon sequestration research grant.

Following protocol, WyoFile appealed to DOE headquarters to reverse the decision. “We feel everything we requested is public record since it involves public monies that fall under the transparency requirements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,” said WyoFile editor in chief Dustin Bleizeffer.

But in a four-page letter dated May 23, director of the DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals Poli A. Marmolejos rejected the WyoFile appeal. His decision, he said, was based in part on new information received by his office “that cannot be disclosed as it may compromise the pending investigation.”

“Our review of that information,” Marmolejos wrote, “further supports our conclusion that release of the requested information could reasonably be expected to cause some foreseeable harm to the pending enforcement proceeding.”

Marmolejos cited a May 15 email from Detwiler stating that the National Energy Technology Laboratory had been repeatedly instructed by the U.S. Attorney in Pittsburgh and by the DOE Inspector General to “not release any documents regarding the cooperative agreements with North American Power Group or DOE’s suspension of those agreements.”

The January 2012 suspension of the $9 million Two Elk stimulus grant to study the feasibility of storing CO2 in geological formations in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin, followed a September 11, 2011, WyoFile story about exceptionally high salaries paid from stimulus funds to Ruffatto, a wealthy Colorado socialite with homes in Denver and Newport Beach, Ca., and Enzi, the son of Wyoming’s senior U.S. Sen. Mike Enzi. Sen. Enzi is an outspoken opponent of the federal stimulus program that was launched by the Obama administration in an effort to create new jobs and revive the moribund economy.

In April of this year, WyoFile reported that the DOE had suspended the Two Elk project after officials discovered that North American had not drilled a deep exploratory well that was supposed to be the centerpiece of the research study. WyoFile also reported that Stanford University and Montana State University, both originally affiliated with the Two Elk research effort, have since stopped participation and that Paul Skirtich, an assistant U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh who specializes in fraud cases, is heading the Department of Justice case related to Two Elk.

WyoFile’s coverage of North American Power Group and its activities in Wyoming, including the saga of a long-planned, never-built $1 billion Two Elk power plant south of Gillette dates to the news site’s initial edition in 2008. Stories in this continuing series can be found under Special Reports on the WyoFile site.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here. Because this is a Special Report, we ask that editors and news directors notify us prior to republication. Simply send an email to editor@wyofile.com.

If you enjoyed this story and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

Click here for WyoFile’s full collection of reports related to the Two Elk project.

Rone Tempest was a longtime national and foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. In 2004 he was part of a team of reporters to win the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the massive wildfires in Southern...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *