After voting to bar photo- and broadcast journalists from the halls that run next to the House and Senate floors in the Wyoming Capitol, the Legislature’s Select Committee on Legislative Facilities, Technology and Process will reconsider the measure during its Thursday meeting.

“Sen. Dan Laursen has some proposed changes,” Committee Chairman Cale Case (R-Lander) told WyoFile. “I am hopeful that we can just roll it back.”

Case was the lone Republican lawmaker to vote against the measure last month, which would eliminate the opportunity for journalists to gather eye-level images of lawmakers at work in each chamber, relegating documentation of what’s happening on the floors to the galleries above. 

The committee voted 4-2 in favor of the measure. Rep. Mike Yin (D-Jackson) was the second “no” vote, and previously said he voted that way since “it’s important that we have as much journalism as possible for the Legislature.”

What changes the committee will consider are unclear. 

Laursen, who voted in favor of the measure, told WyoFile on Tuesday that he “just wanted to discuss it again,” but declined to provide other details. “I think we should just wait until we see what happens,” he said. 

Legislative leadership made the original call for a media-policy change, citing increased traffic in the hallways as a problem. 

The Wyoming Press Association pushed back following the September vote. 

“It has been the role of the fourth estate to report on work being done for the people of Wyoming by their legislators. To limit or revoke access sets a dangerous precedent not only for the Wyoming Legislature itself, but for local government agencies to follow suit,” Darcie Hoffland, executive director of the association, previously told WyoFile. 

The committee is slated to discuss the media policy at 10 a.m. Thursday, according to the agenda. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Don’t we deserve to know what’s going on in the Legislature? Barring the press sounds like censor ship to me. If you bar the press, you bar the people who depend on the press for news.

    Reply

  2. It used to be that politicans learned the hard way to never get crosswise with someone who buys newsprint by the ton and ink by the barrel.
    These days it is wise to not get crosswise with an entity that propels gigabytes of O’s and 1’s to lightspeed using Alternative Energy.

    Yes, by all means. Reconsider. Tinfoil hats or ducking out will no longer save you.

    Reply
  3. Reply
  4. Reply

  5. Huh, maybe these so called “legislators” have realized that the people don’t want a reincarnation of 1933 Germany…even though their beloved “leader” has said that “Hitler has done some good things”…

    Reply