Sen. Michael Von Flatern (R-Gillette) called the work requirement a "poison pill" that would lead the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services to reject Wyoming's SHARE Plan for Medicaid expansion. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Senate advanced a plan for Medicaid expansion this morning, but not before adding an work requirement amendment that the bill’s sponsor called a “poison pill.”

Senators voted 18-11 Monday morning to pass Senate File 129-Medicaid SHARE Plan through first reading. The bill went forward with an amendment from Senate Majority Floor Leader Eli Bebout (R-Riverton) that would require recipients of Medicaid benefits to work at least 32 hours a week.

The Wyoming Department of Health estimates that about 59 percent of Wyoming’s uninsured are working. About two-thirds of those employed work 32 hours a week or more.

Two-thirds of Wyoming's uninsured population works more than 32 hours per week. (Wyoming Department of Health)
Two-thirds of Wyoming’s uninsured population works more than 32 hours per week. (Wyoming Department of Health)
Two-thirds of Wyoming’s uninsured population works more than 32 hours per week. (Wyoming Department of Health)

Bill sponsor Sen. Michael Von Flatern (R-Gillette) pointed to the experiences of other states that have failed to convince Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services to agree to a work requirement. “This will not fly with CMS,” Von Flatern said.

Bebout’s amendment passed on a voice vote. The Senate passed another amendment from Bebout to clarify language on how long the Medicaid expansion may go on. The original bill vaguely reads that the expansion would be “temporary,” while the amendment states it would be “time limited” according to provisions laid out in federal statute.

Another successful amendment sponsored by Sen. Stephan Pappas (R-Cheyenne) creates an account to gather state funds saved as a result of expanding Medicaid. Department of Health numbers project the state could save more than $14.3 million a year by transferring state-funded services to Medicaid.

Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs) offered an unsuccessful amendment to delay submitting an application for Medicaid expansion to the federal government until July 2016. Von Flatern countered that this amendment would result in $54 million in lost federal funds for fiscal year 2016. Senators also tossed out Von Flatern’s amendment to create incentives for taking part in wellness programs, and penalties for inappropriate use of emergency rooms.

Labor Committee member Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper) spoke against SF 129, saying it wouldn't do enough to reduce hospitals' uncompensated care. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)
Labor Committee member Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper) spoke against SF 129, saying it wouldn’t do enough to reduce hospitals’ uncompensated care. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)
Labor Committee member Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper) spoke against SF 129, saying it wouldn’t do enough to reduce hospitals’ uncompensated care. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)

Senate Labor Committee members Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper), and Sen. Charlie Scott (R-Casper) spoke against passing the bill out of first reading. They argued that the bill would only reduce uncompensated care in hospitals by about 7 percent. Von Flatern pointed to data showing other states have seen a 40 percent drop in unpaid care after expanding Medicaid.

Just before the first reading vote, Senate President Phil Nicholas (R-Laramie) spoke in favor of giving the bill three full readings in the Senate. He cautioned the Senate to consider what they would do if the federal share of the expanded Medicaid program drops below 90 percent.

Sen. Phil Nicholas (R-Laramie) urged the Senate to give SF 129 three hearings. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)
Sen. Phil Nicholas (R-Laramie) urged the Senate to give SF 129 three hearings. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile)

“If you want to move toward this direction, you will anticipate (the state) picking up a greater share, and if you do, you will look to redistribute the care that the (Department of Health) provides so that more people are covered with the same dollars,” Nicholas said.

Currently the bill has a “trigger” provision for Wyoming to opt out if the federal share drops below 90 percent. The Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services has told states such as New Hampshire that states can drop out of the expanded Medicaid program without financial penalty from the federal government.

SF 129 faces two more rounds of debate in the Senate before moving to the House.

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *