The one thing now standing between the Wyoming Legislature and its third special session in four years is a simple majority vote.

The prospect of lawmakers returning to Cheyenne has hung in balance since Saturday, when Gov. Mark Gordon submitted his last vetoes of 2024 legislation. Incensed by several of the governor’s rejections, the hard-line Freedom Caucus called for a special session to override vetoes. 

Now, lawmakers have until 5 p.m. Sunday to cast their votes. Final results are expected Monday morning. 

Legislative leaders Speaker of the House Albert Sommers (R-Pinedale) and Senate President Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower) said in a Wednesday op-ed they won’t be counted among the “ayes.” 

“We are calling for a vote of our members to see if they want to come into a special session, but we will be a no vote,” they wrote. 

“We cannot justify calling ourselves into a special session for matters better suited to the 2025 General Session, where we can thoroughly deliberate and develop comprehensive legislation,” Sommers and Driskill wrote. 

The vote comes after days of back and forth. Sommers and Driskill initially rejected calls for a special session, but reconsidered after the Department of Revenue cleared up a misunderstanding around property tax logistics.

If the vote passes, that will mean lawmakers would return to Cheyenne for what could be upwards of weeks.

Mixed messages

Leadership, as well as those pushing for a special session, were particularly displeased with Gordon’s veto of a property tax relief bill.

Gordon signed four other property tax measures, but vetoed Senate File 54 – Homeowner tax exemption since “it would have only provided a temporary and very expensive tax exemption to all Wyoming homeowners at the expense of other taxpayers in our energy industries, retail and manufacturing sectors,” he wrote in his veto letter. 

Sommers previously told WyoFile he’d likely be “all in” on a special session focused solely on SF 54 — a point he and Driskill reiterated in their Wednesday op-ed. 

However, the Freedom Caucus wants to challenge additional vetoes, including those related to new abortion restrictions, a repeal of most gun-free zones and a $75 million legal fund for lawmakers to challenge federal government land plans. 

“This special session is a chance to return to our three-branch system of government,” Bear told WyoFile earlier this week. 

Sen. Cheri Steinmetz (R-Lingle) chairs an official Senate Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources Committee hearing at the Wyoming Capitol in February 2024. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

Sen. Cheri Steinmetz (R-Lingle), who also called for a special session, doubled down on Thursday in a press release in which she called Gordon’s conservative bona fides into question.

“Wyoming, pay special attention, don’t just listen to what is said, evaluate what is done,” Steinmetz wrote. “If your senator and representative don’t vote for a special session, they are abdicating their authority and your voice.” 

The ending 

Much has been said about how exactly Wyoming’s 2024 budget session ended, but not all of it has been true. And the nature of that ending is important since it would dictate how a special session would be carried out.

The last day of the session started around 8 a.m. — roughly two hours earlier than tradition — to give lawmakers a head start to finish their work on the budget. They wrapped up that evening after many hours of hurry-up-and-wait — which is typical of the last day of session because legislative business is finalized at different times. One chamber will often sit at ease while waiting for the other to catch up. Such is also the case when lawmakers break off into conference committees to negotiate discrepancies in bills. 

This often leaves lawmakers idle for hours. 

This year, lawmakers used the time to clean out their desks, shuffle around, bid goodbyes and wish each other safe travels home. In the Senate, a bet was struck about when exactly they’d adjourn. Sen. John Kolb (R-Rock Springs) won. 

Lawmakers on the Senate floor during the Wyoming Legislature’s 2024 budget session. (Ashton J. Hacke/WyoFile)

But when the Wyoming Republican Party sent an email this week in support of a special session and calling on its members to contact their lawmakers, the party mischaracterized the last day. 

“Unfortunately, the abrupt end to the budget session has left our elected representatives without the opportunity to contest these vetoes,” the GOP wrote. “This is a matter of great concern and requires our immediate attention.” 

Lawmakers forewent using three additional days that were constitutionally available to them, but used the full 20 days that had been scheduled for the budget session. The state GOP and members of the Freedom Caucus have told voters the session ended early, blaming leadership in the process. 

That’s a problem for Minority Floor Leader Rep. Mike Yin (D-Jackson). 

“There was no opposition from the Freedom Caucus to permanent adjournment,” Yin wrote in a press release Wednesday.

Yin also pointed out that the motion to permanently adjourn — or “sine die” — was brought by Majority Floor Leader Rep. Chip Neiman (R-Hulett), a member of the Freedom Caucus.

“It is dishonest to blame ‘leadership’ without accepting the caucus’s responsibility for when we adjourned,” Yin wrote. 

Rep. Mike Yin (D-Jackson) listens during the 2024 legislative session. (Ashton J. Hacke)

Yin is opposed to the special session for several reasons, including “the importance of maintaining the principles of limited government,” he wrote.

If the Legislature were to reconvene after every gubernatorial veto, Yin wrote, he’s concerned it would set a precedent for future legislative bodies to expect additional sessions every year.  

The Wyoming Democratic Party has also come out against the special session, asking its members to call on lawmakers to oppose it. 

Square one

No lawmaker in either chamber opposed the motion to adjourn sine die. Nor was there a provision included in either the House or the Senate motion to use the three extra days for a return. 

As such, lawmakers do not currently have the option to return to the Capitol to just address veto overrides. A suspension of the rules, however, could provide that. 

That would require a two-thirds vote in both chambers — a high bar that will be difficult to achieve. The vote that will take place this weekend, however, would just set a special session.

Without a rules suspension, a special session would look like a regular session. That means working within the usual parameters, with bills — of any kind, not just those vetoed — starting at square one. 

The cost of a special session is estimated to run at least $35,000 per day.

Two longtime lawmakers told WyoFile they expect it would take at least a couple weeks to complete, depending on the number of bills files. 

“Based on our history, we fear that expecting self-restraint within the chambers might be wishful thinking,” Sommers and Driskill wrote in their op-ed. “Remember, history has a tendency to repeat itself.”

The Legislature failed to limit its scope through the rules during the most recent special session in 2021. Out of the 51 bills filed in 2020 and 2021 special sessions, four became law. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. When are Wyoming voters going to wise-up regarding the, so called, freedom Caucus and it’s authoritarian approach to government? This possible special session vote is all about overreach, only satisfying the maga extremists. Wake Up Wyoming!

  2. It is my hope that most legislators will reject the idea of a special session. There is little hope that the extremists in the Freedom Caucus will abide by Leadership’s request that the session focus solely on the property tax bill and not wander off on tangents about legislation that did not go their way. The FC has already demonstrated their lack of respect for the Leadership. Sadly, they cannot be trusted to follow any instructions put before them – they are only interested in their own agenda. Let’s not forget – those are our tax dollars they will be spending if they return.

    1. After watching these people repeatedly talk their own bills to death with endless blathering, I’ll never believe they have the discipline for a focused special session

  3. You all can blame your Republic rat governor for this. He must be hanging out with the Liz Cheney wolves in sheep’s clothing crowd. It’s time to get back to work Republicans and override his lousy vetoes of we the people!

    1. Your own people moved to adjourn the session and then sat on their hands! They’ll never take responsibility for or learn from their mistakes.

  4. Let’s hope the majority of the legislature votes this down. The Freedumb Caucus did enough damage to Wyoming without their being able to do more. Such a circus would only waste more of our tax dollars.

  5. You’re a bunch of Clowns and I am embarrassed to be “represented” by you. Build more houses and actually improve this state or stop stealing my tax dollars and get a real job where you can get fired for being this awful. It’s really as simple as that, Clowns.

  6. What an embarrassment! First, leadership is derelict in their duty. You don’t lead by majority vote, you lead by making the right decision for those that you lead, regardless of the disruptive kids in the back that didn’t get their way. Both the Speaker of the House and the Senate President know that a special session is not warranted, but they have given into the disruptive kids that are committed to turning the old clock back to 1890. On the topic of the Freedom Caucus, they clearly don’t understand the rules of procedure, or more likely, believe that the rules don’t apply to them. Both chambers voted to adjourn with three days available to them to wait for any vetoes coming their way from the governor. The vote to adjourn solidifies that a special session is unwarranted. The “conservatives” are happy to waste plenty of money on pet projects and special sessions when they don’t get their way, but the rest of the time they profess their “conservative beliefs” while putting all of the money under the mattress. If you can’t collectively “lead” the state within the constraints of the Wyoming Constitution, then just maybe you’re not up for the job. In our great state, we don’t have the traditional conservative vs. liberal/Republican vs. Democrat, we have conservative vs. ultra conservative and as a result we have more divisiveness than other states that in theory have more landscape between ideas and beliefs than we do.

  7. This is just another opportunity to say NO to the Chaos Caucus. No need to waste more of the voters’ money.

  8. Sorry, kids, but you don’t get a special session when you didn’t use all of the time available to you.

    Wyoming Constitution Article 4, Section 8 says ” … If any bill is not returned by the governor within three days (Sundays excepted) after its presentation to him, the same
    shall be a law, unless the legislature by its adjournment, prevent its return, in which case it shall be a law, unless he shall file the same with his objections in the office of the secretary of state within fifteen days after such adjournment.”

    You decide you didn’t want to respond to vetos when you adjourned.

  9. Did the Freedom Caucus not understand procedural etiquette for adjourning? Or is this another ploy to disrupt the legislative process?

    The adjournment of the Wyoming 2024 legislative budget session followed normal protocol. The Majority Floor Leader, Chip Neiman, a Freedom Caucus leadership member, motioned to permanently adjourn the 2024 budget session on the House side and no one objected…including anyone from the Freedom Caucus. Plus, they did not pursue staying for the additional three days that were available. Senator Hicks, Senate Majority Floor Leader did the same on the Senate side. See the actual links to the Senate and House being adjourned on March 8th 2024 and then you can decide if that matches what is being said now.

    Forward to 2:42:00
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jy4y-ZNSYI&ab_channel=WyomingLegislature
    Forward to 3:33:00
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otVyANGA588&ab_channel=WyomingLegislature

    WHY? Because the Freedom Caucus is trying to disrupt our government anyway they can. FYI…The Freedom Caucus only needs six more members to have control of the Wyoming House.

    I don’t know about you, but I am tired of being pitted against my neighbors and fellow Wyomingites. What happened to good old fashion Wyoming statesmanship?

  10. Be careful Freedom Caucus! Keep this up and the tide might turn against you. I would bet that most voters are pretty fed up with the BS political stunts you keep pulling. Your total lack of ability to coherently write a bill that would hold up in court and your ineptitude at governing is proving your movement to be a sham. I would bet even your most fervent supporters are starting to question your “limited approach to governance” with this move, much less your stamina to legislate.

  11. So the freedumb caucus isn’t being honest about their votes to adjourn?

    Are they honest about anything?