This commentary was originally published by Writers on the Range.

In early September, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that continued to rely on big-bad-wolf myths. He claimed that living in wolf country is โ€œvery dangerous.โ€

Opinion

He then directed Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to determine whether gray wolves and Mexican wolves should lose federal protection under the Endangered Species Act. Without waiting for an answer, he also directed Burgum to support Congressional removal of gray wolves from the endangered species list.

Wildlife defenders noted that Trumpโ€™s directives were in part meant to distract the public from the impact of the presidentโ€™s decision to ease tariffs on imported beef, making life harder for American ranchers. The truth is that killing wolves wonโ€™t do a thing to lower meat prices or help the industry, as according to USDA data, just 1% of cattle and sheep losses are attributed to wolves in states with wolf populations. 

Research also shows that killing wolves doesnโ€™t prevent conflict. When conflicts do occur, there are tools like range riding, carcass removal, scare devices and other deterrents. Sens. Adam Schiff, D-California, and Steve Daines, R-Montana, recently introduced the Human-Wildlife Conflict Reduction Act, which would help ranchers by assisting with such livestock protection strategies.

Beyond dramatically overstating wolvesโ€™ impact on the cattle industry, it was particularly troubling to see an American president repeat the absurd claim that federal protections for wolves should be eliminated because they put peopleโ€™s lives at risk โ€” that โ€œinnocent people can get in bad shape.โ€

Such misleading statements not only have serious consequences for wolf conservation and recovery, they also do a disservice to those living in wolf country by stoking unnecessary fear. It is already legal to kill a wolf, even a federally endangered one, in defense of human life.

More importantly, wolves want little to do with people and generally avoid us. Like bears and cougars, they share spaces with us in rural communities and areas in which human development and wild spaces overlap, where they can be curious. They can also be territorial toward domestic dogs and can sometimes follow us at a distance until weโ€™re away from their pups. Wolves can sometimes approach hunters imitating animal calls, too, not realizing whatโ€™s making the noise.

But wolves are simply not out to get us.

I began tracking wolves โ€” following their tracks through the woods โ€” in my teens, sometimes with friends and family, sometimes solo, sometimes for fun, sometimes for work (always carrying bear spray). Iโ€™ve been close to a lot of wolves. If humans were on their menu, a short woman hiking alone should be like a free hot dog. But Iโ€™ve never once felt threatened.

One encounter now on video, where a wolf walked in my direction (not knowing I was there) and then retreated, was published by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to educate people about wolf behavior. It has amassed over 23 million views: โ€œWhat to Expect if You Encounter a Wolfโ€ on YouTube. Itโ€™s worth watching.

Every year, millions of people live, hike, and hunt in wolf territory without incident. Since their populations began to recover in the 1980s, wolves have caused just one human injury in the Lower 48 states. In Canada and Alaska, where more wolves roam, only about 10 incidents โ€” two fatal โ€”  have occurred since 2000. Almost all of these involved wolves conditioned to human food or garbage. Lightning killed more than 40 Canadians in that timespan. Mexican wolves, a smaller subspecies in the Southwest, have never attacked a human.

In a recent review of wolf-human conflicts, researchers stated that โ€œthe risks associated with a wolf attack are above zero, but far too low to calculate.โ€

Millions flock to Yellowstone National Park for the opportunity to see wolves. Sometimes hazing is required when wolves become too comfortable with people โ€” for their safety more than ours. Yellowstone wolves are targeted by trophy hunters and recreational trappers when they cross the invisible park boundary. In Montana, Wyoming and Idaho, wolves are killed by the hundreds, demonstrating the deadly consequences for wolves when protection is removed.

The return of wolves is an opportunity for curiosity, wonder and respect, not scapegoating. Wolves deserve better than to be used as a distraction by the Trump administration, and those living alongside wolves deserve better than fearmongering.

Story Warren is a program manager in wildlife protection for the Humane Society of the United States.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name โ€” first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFileโ€™s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • Weโ€™re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on whatโ€™s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when theyโ€™re submitted โ€” or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. Weโ€™ll get to it when weโ€™re back in the office.
  • Weโ€™re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenterโ€™s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. Weโ€™ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If thatโ€™s going to upset you, itโ€™s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We donโ€™t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please donโ€™t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments โ€” maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *