Bill Adams of Jackson Electric Inc. operates a trackhoe at a construction site in Casper in 2015. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Gov. Mark Gordon’s open call for ideas on how to spend more than $1 billion from the American Rescue Plan Act — a measure all three Wyoming Congressional delegates opposed — has so far garnered more than 100 proposals that collectively surpass $3 billion.

The proposals range from affordable housing projects and childcare access expansion to workforce retraining, suicide prevention and carbon capture technology for coal-fired power plants.

State agency directors — key players in Gordon’s “survive, drive and thrive strike team” — outlined several goals for how to invest the federal dollars during a public webinar Friday, as well as some proposals. Any Wyoming resident or group can submit a proposal.

Several speakers noted that many of the proposals are rooted in systemically underfunded health and human services needs laid bare by the pandemic, as well as civic and economic innovations.

“One thing that the COVID pandemic really taught us, or showed us, is something which many of us already knew, was the fragility of the human services and healthcare systems,” Wyoming Department of Family Services Director Korin Schmidt said. “We don’t always invest in our nonprofit sector, especially on the health and human services side, in ways that we may invest in other parts of our industries.”

In addition to suicide prevention and mental health services, the governor’s call for ARPA investment proposals garnered a $90 million proposal for “hospital and long-term care facility upgrades and renovations … senior centers across Wyoming, and remodels necessary to adequately care for ‘hard to place’ clients, including youth, at congregate care facilities,” according to the governor’s “Drive and Thrive” website.

Gov. Mark Gordon and policy director Renny MacKay prepare to address the Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Appropriations Committee on June 15, 2021 in Cheyenne. (Joel Funk/WyoFile)

Another proposal calls for $100 million to “fund housing for Wyoming’s workforce, homeless citizens, low-to-moderate income rental housing, and moderate-income home ownership.”

“When this act passed Congress, the governor did not want to just look at the act and how it required money to be spent,” Gordon’s Policy Director Renny MacKay said during the Dec. 3 webinar. “He wanted folks to think as big as possible and as boldly as possible about what would be best to do to help Wyoming thrive.”

Despite the abundance of proposals for ARPA spending, there’s still wariness over the stimulus programs, federal spending policy and the size of federal government influence in Wyoming. The federal stimulus programs are spending money that belongs to future generations, MacKay said.

“I think we all have to wait and see what strings are attached to the federal programs,” MacKay told WyoFile. “That has certainly led to some long conversations about whether or not to apply or accept funds already.”

From ‘survive’ to ‘thrive’

Wyoming has so far received $534 million in ARPA funds and is scheduled to receive another $534 million in 2022. The state has until 2026 to appropriate the money.

Even as Gordon deployed $1.25 billion in CARES Act funding to help schools, healthcare providers and businesses cope with the pandemic and its economic shock, he and the Legislature made sizable budget cuts in 2020 that Gordon warned “will impact families across the state, will affect the services we provide and will have an effect on dollars that flow into the private sector.”

Those cuts were the result of significant projected revenue shortfalls. Gordon has said the state should avoid increasing spending even though revenue forecasts have since improved.

“I think we all have to wait and see what strings are attached to the federal programs. That has certainly led to some long conversations about whether or not to apply or accept funds already.”

Renny MacKay, policy director to Gov. Mark Gordon

Though recent cuts have created voids that state and nonprofit agencies hope to at least partially backfill, priorities for federal stimulus funds should not require continuing support from state revenues, MacKay said. The federal stimulus dollars, as well as money flowing to Wyoming through the infrastructure bill, MacKay added, represent broad opportunities for one-time investments in strengthening Wyoming communities and state programs as they prepare for a changing economy.

“You can’t start a program that’s going to need money in three years,” MacKay said. “So we’re really looking to try to leverage these [federal stimulus dollars] to have the biggest impact as possible, knowing that they’re one-time in nature.”

The same concept was applied to spending Wyoming’s $1.25 billion in CARES Act funding, MacKay said. The state has appropriated all of the CARES Act funding as of September.

The governor’s “Drive and Thrive” website lists 10 general goals for ARPA spending and includes synopses of proposals received so far. The governor will continue to accept proposals throughout the next year, MacKay said. However, Gordon will present his first phase of ARPA spending priorities to the Legislature later this month.

Broadband ambitions

One proposal suggests allocating $150 million to continue a Wyoming Business Council-led buildout of broadband capacity. That’s a particular challenge given Wyoming’s large geography and sparse population.

“Wyoming as a whole, other than Casper and Cheyenne, is technically difficult for any business to make a go of with [existing] broadband,” Gillette-based Visionary Broadband CEO Brian Worthen told WyoFile. “Anybody that’s not adjacent to a larger community is typically left out in the cold.”

It’s difficult for broadband providers to create an economically viable business plan to build out networks in places like Crook and Big Horn counties for their low population, and places like Sublette County because it’s so spread out, Worthen said.

“And so there’s this huge inequity because everybody in Wyoming loves their space and space is contrary to broadband adoption,” Worthen said.

Yet the Wyoming Business Council has made strides in leveraging state and federal funds to help providers install more capacity in rural communities, according to Worthen.

Downtown Pinedale in 2019. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

“Now [ARPA and the infrastructure bill] introduces the ability to say yes, there is a provider in town providing decent service but is not reliable and therefore grant money should be used to build a second option,” Worthen said. “That’s the opportunity; there’s going to be a door open for other providers to come in, introduce a second option, which means more competition, faster speeds, lower price.”

Wyoming allocated $50 million in CARES Act funding to the Connect Wyoming broadband effort. The state can continue to make strides in adding broadband with ARPA funds, Wyoming Business Council CEO Josh Dorrell said, and it’s a good example of how one-time federal stimulus dollars can help bolster Wyoming’s economy. Reliable broadband capacity is a key to surviving the changing economy for Wyoming’s businesses, residents and programs, Dorrell said.

“Right now, we’re trying to understand the need and where that money should go to make the biggest difference,” Dorrell said. 

Municipality investments

Although cities and counties received their own portions of federal CARES Act and ARPA stimulus dollars, the state’s portion of ARPA funds can help offset future capital expenses by investing in municipal infrastructure, Wyoming Association of Municipalities Member Services Manager Justin Schilling said.

Those community-level investments are key to expanding and attracting new, diverse businesses, he added.

“We need to not put economic diversification on the backburner again,” Schilling told WyoFile. “I think that’s something that, hopefully, we can do better than past generations.”

The water tower at Midwest in 2017. (Wikimedia/Jonathunder)

There’s pent-up need among Wyoming communities due to shifting fossil-fuel markets and past state budget cuts, he added. But investments with federal stimulus dollars must be strategic, Schilling said, because some of the dollars are prescribed for specific programs.

For example, Wyoming will receive $63 million for water infrastructure, and the program prioritizes underserved communities. It doesn’t make sense for a community to use ARPA funds for needs that are prioritized under the federal infrastructure stimulus program, Schilling said, so it will require smart planning to ensure Wyoming makes the best use of the one-time federal stimulus programs.

“We’ve told people to kind of play it slow until we’ve got better guidance and things come more into focus,” Schilling said.

The various federal stimulus programs will go a long way to update and expand municipal drinking water and wastewater systems, Schilling said, as well as broadband and various local public services.

“We really have to continue to push very hard, especially in a time like this when there’s this historic amount of money to be invested in the future of the state,” Schilling said.

Dustin Bleizeffer

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 22 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The Governor needs to meet with the president of all the Jr. Colleges because each college needs different programs. With out the Jr College their would not be a UW .

  2. I hope Wyoming’s Republican politicians aren’t crowing about how good a job they did in securing these funds for Wyoming. I’ve heard comments that if a state’s congressional representatives didn’t vote for the bill, their states shouldn’t get any of the funds. There may be some credibility to this sentiment, but the people of the states would be the losers, not the politicians, I fear.

  3. “$150 million to continue a Wyoming Business Council-led buildout of broadband capacity.”

    Wasn’t the big fiber ring supposed to deal with this? A subsidy for ISPs seems misguided. This just lets them expand their business at taxpayer expense. They aren’t deserving. Not that WY shouldn’t expand access to underserved areas, they should. But overpriced, throttled, low speed internet is the problem as was clearly shown during the pandemic when school kids were trying to login to online classes. What good is high speed internet service if you can’t afford it? Subsidized access via ISPs usually fails to fix the problem.

    How many libraries in the state provide high speed wireless internet inside and outside their buildings? How many are open throughout the weekend and evenings? Too few. Change that.

    On the topic if housing, the lack of affordable housing keeps people from moving to WY, and pushes them out of WY – along with poor wages. The private sector hasn’t stepped up to the plate to address that. Especially for seniors but also for badly needed workforce housing that meets needs of residents (not transients) in terms of function and affordability.

    Demographics have changed too. More single people, more childless couples, more single parents, more diverse living arrangements. More remote workers. Attractive housing for them is in short supply everywhere in the USA. Be the first to offer up an alternative and maybe people will gravitate to WY from nearby states.

  4. Wyoming has been blessed with an abundance of natural resources. The problem is as the resources dry up Wyoming hasn’t figured out a way to replace unrewable resources or keep some of the resources to rebuild our economy. The resources flow out leaving nothing to replace them. I remember going to the University of Wyoming and someone wrote they hoped that as the last drop of oil and ton of coal left Wyoming they hoped there would be someone left to shut off the lights. In the article, another fallacy is brought out that the only two communities that have the technical ability to survive is Casper and Cheyenne. The legislators there have the vote and steal potential from the small communities. A good example is the overthrust southwest where billions upon billions worth of resources left and wells dried up nothing came in to replace it. I was on the Uinta County economic development board and we had people that wanted to bring businesses and industries to southwestern Wyoming. We would make a proposal and send it to the Wyoming Business Council only to have it stolen and given to eastern Wyoming. Wyoming doesn’t want change. They want only to keep things just as they are. This mentality stifles growth in smaller communities other than Cheyenne or Casper that have the representatives.