Grand Teton National Park's Jenny Lake Rangers and scientists work together to collect data on the park's glaciers. Here they can be seen collecting measurements on the Middle Teton Glacier using high-accuracy GPS units mounted on a pole. The terrain requires the use of ropes, crampons, and other climbing gear to safely work on the glacier. (National Park Service)

The Middle Teton Glacier in Grand Teton National Park, shrank by 36,000 cubic-meters between 2015 and 2016. That’s the equivalent of losing space for about 50, 2,500-square-foot homes, said Simeon Caskey, branch chief of physical sciences in Grand Teton National Park.

The following winter, 2016-2017, saw enormous snowpacks in the Tetons. The glacier still lost 3,000-cubic meters, or two 2,500-square-foot homes.

“To me, it seems large in terms of sheer mass,” Caskey said.

It’s hard to say what’s “normal,” when it comes to glacier shrinking, Caskey said. The loss of volume is comparable to other glaciers in the West, but looking at it long-term, “it’s very accelerated,” he said.

Researchers at Grand Teton National Park and their partners are trying to better understand what is happening to glaciers across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

The park launched a program in 2012 to monitor and measure changes on several of the glaciers within its boundaries, using time-lapse cameras and high-accuracy GPS units to measure size.

The Middle Teton Glacier as seen on Aug. 17, 2016. The glacier lost approximately 36,000 cubic meters of volume between 2015 and 2016. The loss is seen here in the amount of exposed dark gray ice. (National Park Service)

Last year the park joined forces with the Forest Service to start an ecosystem-wide glacier monitoring program. Researchers will monitor one glacier in the Wind River Mountains, one in the Beartooths and one in the Tetons using standardized methodology to compare changes.

“It’s really exciting we are looking at it from an ecosystem perspective,” Caskey said.

It’s a chance to understand how glaciers contribute to the watershed and fish and wildlife habitat, and to get a handle on how quickly they are declining and what that means for the ecosystem, he said.

There are 12 glaciers—10 named—in Grand Teton National Park. The park selected the Middle Teton Glacier, just below the summit of the 12,805-foot mountain to survey year-to-year, because of its accessibility, Caskey said. Other glaciers like the Schoolroom glacier, with its steep face and crevasses, or the Teton Glacier, known for rock fall, made regular monitoring dangerous, he said.

The Forest Service and other academic partners used the 2017 summer field season for reconnaissance — to examine their options and determine which glaciers to monitor.

“Our glaciers are so accessible when compared to the Wind River and Beartooths,” Caskey said. “It’s another level there.”

Reaching glaciers in those ranges typically require 20-plus-mile hikes through rugged terrain — one way. The project needs glaciers that are both representative of the others in the range and accessible every year, no matter the snow conditions. Researchers will select the glaciers to monitor in the Winds and Beartooths in the next couple of months, Caskey said.

The Middle Teton Glacier as seen on Aug. 18, 2017. Though 2016-2017 was an above average snow year, the glacier still lost about 3,000 cubic meters of volume. (National Park Service)

The studies will track the position of the bottom edge of each glacier — the glacial terminus — with GPS units that can measure changes as small as centimeters.

They will also measure the area covered by the glacier using a standardized grid and fixed photo points to see change over time.

Researchers in Grand Teton National Park, with the help of the Jenny Lake Climbing Rangers, will continue to monitor other glaciers in the park with remote time-lapse cameras. They will also use satellite imagery to keep an eye on glaciers that couldn’t otherwise be safely reached on a regular basis, Caskey said.

In Grand Teton, and the Winds, researchers are looking for historical photographs taken by early climbers that show the glaciers. They hope to reconstruct some of the shots to compare with the images from decades before monitoring started.

Caskey also plans to start a citizen science project in Grand Teton that asks climbers to photograph glaciers seen from the peaks they scale. Some of the best photos of the Middle Teton Glacier come from routes on the nearby Grand Teton, he said.

Never miss a Peaks to Plains. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.

There is still a lot unknown about the glaciers in the Greater Yellowstone, including how fast they move. Measuring velocity would take drilling a hole deep into the glacier and revisiting the site multiple times in a season. The park hasn’t yet prioritized such costly measurements, he said.

Scientists elsewhere have constructed models to predict when certain glaciers will disappear. That research hasn’t occurred in Grand Teton, but the data gathered by the park annually will allow for some preliminary modeling, Caskey said.

Researchers rarely have the chance to observe geological processes, Caskey said, because they typically unfold over vast stretches of time. “Glaciers are one of our great opportunities to look at something that manifests a dynamic landscape and we can actually see a change on a decadal and human life scale.”

Kelsey Dayton is a freelancer and the editor of Outdoors Unlimited, the magazine of the Outdoor Writers Association of America. She has worked as a reporter for the Gillette News-Record, Jackson Hole News&Guide...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. tangential modeling from a super “el nino” period? And the net loss was only two 2500 square foot homes. I think that ain’t so bad. keep the good pictures and math coming. young people deserve no less.