Millions of visitors come to Yellowstone National Park annually and many drive through Hayden Valley. Tribal members say F. V. Hayden, who advocated for creation of the world’s first national park, also was a racist who condoned genocide. (Jacob W. Frank/National Park Service)

Update: Please see the May 17 update below for the Park County Commissioners’ explanation of their resistance to the name changes and a clarification regarding their response to a request by WyoFile for comment — Ed.

The U.S. Board on Geographic Names could decide this summer to change two names in Yellowstone National Park that Native Americans say memorialize a racist and a murderer.

Hayden Valley and Mount Doane are names that are “considered to be offensive,” says a proposal before the board. The names should be changed to Buffalo Nations Valley and First Peoples Mountain, respectively, Brandon Sazue, then-chairman of the Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Association, wrote in a filing last year.

Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden led the first federal expedition to Yellowstone in 1871.

The Park County Board of Commissioners disagrees.

Hayden Valley is the namesake of Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, the geologist who led an expedition into Yellowstone in 1871. Mount Doane takes its name from Gustavus Cheyney Doane, a U.S. Army Cavalry lieutenant who escorted early expeditions by white explorers into Yellowstone. The Board on Geographic Names formalized the two monikers in 1930.

Despite their contributions to American history, the two men’s names should be expunged from official geographic usage because of their actions and beliefs, the tribal proposal says.

“Dr. Ferdinand V. Hayden advocated the ‘extermination’ of tribal people in an official government document … published in 1872,” the tribal proposal reads. Doane “led the massacre of Chief Heavy Runner’s Peigan Blackfeet village on the Marias River,” several months before the 1870 Yellowstone expedition. Doane’s men killed 173 persons, only 15 of whom were of fighting age, the application states.

“It is, as many tribal leaders have protested, shameful, that Yellowstone National Park continues to honor a war criminal, Lieutenant Gustavus C. Doane, and a white supremacist who advocated for the genocide of indigenous people, Dr. Ferdinand V. Hayden, by retaining their names on major features of Yellowstone National Park,” the proposal states.

It takes about eight months, “on average,” to decide whether a name should be changed, said Lou Yost, executive secretary for domestic names with the agency. That could put the matter before the board this summer, he said in a telephone interview from Reston, Virginia.

Mt. Doane was named in honor of Lieutenant Gustavus Cheyney Doane.

At least 28 tribes — including the Northern Arapaho, Eastern Shoshone and Northern Cheyenne —  have advocated for the change, but that’s no guarantee the board will agree to their proposal. “Local acceptance of any name is important to the Board,” Yost wrote to the chairman of the Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Association last year. Consequently, the board is expected to consider recommendations — for or against the changes — from area residents, plus some governments and agencies.

“We get input from the county board of commissioners and the state board on geographic names,” Yost said in an interview. “In this case, the National Park Service as well.”

Already one entity has weighed in. Last week Yost received a completed form titled Geographic Name Proposal Recommendation signed by Park County Commission chairman Loren Grosskopf.

On the line proposing the new name Buffalo Nations Valley, a checkmark appears below the word “Reject.” For first Peoples Mountain, “Reject” is checked again. The form included a place for comments, but none were inscribed.

Not Wyoming’s first place-name rodeo

Wyoming and the U.S. Board on Geographic Names have grappled before, with a proposal to change a name deemed offensive by tribes — Devils Tower. The running skirmish between tribes, who hold the iconic butte sacred and wanted it called Bears Lodge, and area residents flared up in 1995.

It continues today with U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney championing a bill that would make the name Devils Tower permanent. The House Committee on Natural Resources passed H.R. 401 in March this year, “protecting the name of one of Wyoming’s most beloved and well-known landmarks,” Cheney said in a statement on her website.

“The name Devils Tower is over a century old and represents one of the most well-known sites in the nation,” Cheney’s statement read. “In addition to its historic importance in our state, Devils Tower attracts crucial tourism and revenue to our communities.”

Cheney’s bill is similar to a bill introduced by then U.S. Rep. Barbara Cubin in 1996 and one by U.S. Sen. Mike Enzi in 2015. All three affected the federal Board on Geographic Names and its Domestic Names Committee, which decides on names and changes. The committee “has a long-standing policy of deferring action when a matter is being considered by Congress,” the House Committee on Natural Resources majority report on Cheney’s bill reads. “The Wyoming Board of Geographic Names, which serves in an advisory capacity to the BGN, has indicated it will not act on the name change while the matter is being considered by Congress, as it follows the DNC’s policies.”

The Devil’s Tower vote was 20-13 along party lines with Democrats on the losing end. The bill has a 57 percent chance of being enacted, according to Skopos Labs, a firm that tracks legislation.

Devils Tower Trading Post operates in a tourism economy that could be harmed if the name of the country’s first national monument was changed, opponents to the name change say. Critics contend the economy would not be affected if the peak was renamed Bears Lodge, but a bill sponsored by U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney will prevent that change, for now. (Flickr CC/Wayne Hsieh)

The minority produced a dissenting report, saying the bill ignores the concern of more than 25 tribes. “While this bill seems quite unassuming on its face, it is actually intended to bypass the serious concerns of local tribes that have long been offended by this erroneous name,” the minority report said.

Whether Cheney’s bill passes or not, it effectively shortstops any change petition, Democrats said. “Usually, the U.S. Board on Geographic Names would embark on a consultation and comment period regarding the name change,’ the minority report reads. “However, the mere introduction of H.R 401 derails this process.”

Arvol Looking Horse, Great Sioux Nation spiritual leader, filed a petition in 2014 to change the name, the report said. Devils Tower was a “botched translation” of Mato Tipila, or Bear Lodge. The mistake was first recorded as Bad God’s Tower, which morphed into Devils Tower, the report says.

Devils Tower is perceived by tribal members as “highly offensive, insulting, disparaging, disrespectful, derogatory, and repugnant,” the petition reads. The name Devils Tower “serves as a constant irritant that causes displeasure, anger, and ongoing resentment in [the tribal] community.”

Compared to the 100-plus year history of the name Devils Tower, the Black Hills area where the feature rises has been the home of indigenous people for “centuries before the creation of the United States of America,” the petition reads.

“To add insult to injury, these tribes do not associate the monument with bad gods or evil spirits in any way,” the minority report reads. “In contrast, it is a very holy site.”

The “Bear Lodge name will not negatively affect local tourism or the economy of Wyoming,” the 2014 petition to rename the tower says. Democrats said tourism worries don’t erase the insult to tribes. “We appreciate the economic impact that Devils Tower offers to the State of Wyoming and the surrounding region, but that does not change the fact that its erroneous name is offensive to many citizens of this country.”

Meanwhile, back in the world’s first national park…

The more recent Yellowstone name-change proposal has now drawn its first detractors. After submitting its form urging rejection of the proposed change, Park County commissioners will decide how to respond to requests that they explain their reasoning. Commissioners last week were not available or did not return phone messages and emails seeking comment.

The agenda for today’s regular commissioners’ meeting contains an item for the board to “discuss and consider response to reasons for objection to name changes,” in Yellowstone.

Park County has so far submitted only a single official comment form, but the Devils Tower controversy rallied many neighbors of the country’s first national monument. Part of their protest focused on the potential change of the name of the “populated place” knowns as Devils Tower, a settlement that includes a U.S. Post Office and a  zip code — 82714. A Crook County survey saw 93 percent opposed to changing the name of the summit, 89 percent rejecting the change for the settlement.

“While I do reali[s]e there is a claim of importance to Native American Indians, it is our backyard, our heritage, and part of our culture for over 100 years,” one person wrote. Wrote another; “Personally, I take pride in being from ‘Devils Tower’, Wyoming.” A third said, “How can people who do not even live in the area propose a name change to a populated place?”

Added the Crook County commissioners; “The Tower can be shared by all.”

The board reaches out to the local governments and encourages engagement. “Basically, it’s a ground-up process,” the BGN’s Yost said. “Local acceptance of any name is important to the Board,” he wrote. The changes are allowed under policies set by the Board on Geographic Names, however, which can alter names “asserted to be offensive.”

The National Park Service will make comments to the Board on Geographic Names “when they advise us that the Yellowstone locations in question are on their agenda at a future meeting,” NPS spokesman Jeffrey Olson said in an email. “This is based on our policy to not comment publicly until the Board meets.”

After tribes decided in 2014 on Buffalo Nations Valley to replace Hayden Valley and First Peoples Mountain to replace Mount Doane, Great Plains tribal association chairman Sazue, a resident of Fort Thompson, South Dakota, submitted the proposal to the U.S. names board. It published the request on its quarterly review list in December 2017, launching official consideration of the request.

In his time, Hayden called for extermination of Indians “unless they are localized and made to enter upon agricultural and pastoral pursuits,” the petition states. Such statements condone genocide, tribal members say.

The geologist and explorer is best known for advocating for the world’s first national park, which Congress created in 1872, the year after his expedition.

Hayden’s name has been associated since 1886 with rolling meadows stretching through a valley seven miles long and six miles wide between Lake and Canyon villages. The majestic Yellowstone River meanders through that landscape creating a primordial scene of bison, grizzly bears, elk and waterfowl, plus tourist vehicles on the Grand Loop Road.

“If, as Wallace Stegner suggested, the world’s first national park was America’s ‘best idea,’ how do you reconcile having the main thoroughfare of America’s best idea named to honor an individual who proposed the extermination — the genocide — of the land’s original inhabitants?” The Crow Creek Sioux Tribe wrote in a letter to the board.

Mount Doane, the sunlit peak center-left, rises above Yellowstone Lake along with Mount Langford, in the shadow behind, and Mount Stevenson. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

Doane, a U.S. Army Cavalry soldier, escorted the Washburn-Langford-Doane expedition into Yellowstone in 1870, the year before Hayden’s trip. After his expedition in 1871, Hayden proposed the name Mount Doane for a peak on the east shore of Yellowstone Lake. It rises next to Mount Stevenson and Mount Langford, two other white figures in early Yellowstone exploration.

The name Mount Doane has been in use since 1885. At 10,649 feet, it is a wild peak, raking the sky, catching storms and looming over one of the most remote places in the Lower 48.

“There is not, never was, nor ever will be, any justification or place for the names of killers like Doane … to be memorialized,” officials with the Northern Cheyenne Tribe Administration in Lame Deer, Montana wrote in support of the change.

In presenting a declaration to Yellowstone Park officials last Sept. 16, Piikani Nation (formerly Peigan Nation) representatives said their delegation included “descendants of survivors of [the] Marias River Massacre that Doane led.” The tribe wants interpretive signs to be installed recognizing that the park is no longer “Indian-free” as a park superintendent once declared.

The changes would be made “in honor of all Tribal nations that have treaty rights and interests to Greater Yellowstone and those with an ancestral connection to this sacred landscape and our relatives, the Buffalo Nation,” a history that goes back 10,000 years, the petition reads.

Interested tribes

The tribes listed below have signed letters, declarations or resolutions, or are members of tribal organizations that have supported changing the names of Hayden Valley to Buffalo Nations Valley and Mount Doane to First Peoples Mountain.

Oglala Sioux Tribe

Yankton Sioux Tribe

Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

Crow Creek Sioux Tribe

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe

Lower Brule Sioux Tribe

Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate

Rosebud Sioux Tribe

Spirit Lake Tribe

Three Affiliated Tribes

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe

Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa

Omaha Tribe

Santee Sioux Tribe

Ponca Tribe of Nebraska

Winnebago Tribe

Piikani Nation

Northern Cheyenne Tribe­

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation

Little Shell Chippewa Tribe

Northern Arapaho

Fort Belknap Indian Community Council

Fort Peck Tribes Assiniboine Sioux

Crow Tribe

Eastern Shoshone

Blackfeet Nation

Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation of Montana

Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation,

UPDATE, May 17 — Park County Commissioners on May 15 answered Jennifer Runyon, a member of the research staff of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, who asked for “a reason why the commissioners are opposed to changing the names of Mount Doane and Hayden Valley.” Commission Chairman Loren Grosskopf provided WyoFile with a copy of the board’s response May 16. It reads:

“Ms. Runyon

The Park County Commissioners met today and offer the following reasons for opposing the name changes as suggested:

  • Attempting to analyze the history of these public figures should be viewed from all perspectives and include consideration of the circumstances happening in the 1800s
  • The current names have been used for decades (a century?)
  • The public relies upon written history
  • We don’t understand the real need to change
  • Pride and respect for Park County’s, Yellowstone National Park and our nation’s history

Please take our comments into consideration.

Loren Grosskopf, Chairman, Park County Board of Commissioners.”

Also, commissioner Grosskopf responded to WyoFile’s May 7, request for comment on May 7, but his email apparently went into a spam folder and wasn’t discovered until May 17.

Here is commissioner Grosskopf’s May 7 response to WyoFile’s request for explanation of the board’s position against changing the Yellowstone monikers.

“From: Loren Grosskopf

Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 3:50 PM

To: Angus Thuermer Jr.

Subject: Re: Park county opinion on Yellowstone names

I will get back to you. We will put some explanation on paper to document our decision.


Loren Grosskopf, Park County Commissioner.”

Commissioner Jake Fulkerson also responded to a request for comment. His response, below, also was discovered in a spam folder on May 17:


Commissioners French, Tilden and Livingston are much more passionate than I on the matter.  I recommend you contact one of them.

Jake Fulkerson, Vice  Chair

Park County Board of County Commissioners

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone”

WyoFile regrets the miscommunication with the Park County Board of Commissioners and any misrepresentation that may have arisen as a result. Any role it played in the miscommunication was inadvertent.

In all, Thuermer made six phone calls to Park County commissioners and sent five emails. — Ed.


Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at or (307)...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The story indicated that the Park County Board of County Commissioners did not respond to your inquiry about our action. That is incorrect! When contacted by WyoFile by email after our initial meeting, I did respond back to Angus via e-mail and indicated that we would offer our reasons for opposition but that would be after our meeting on May 15, 2018 as it would have to be official commissioner action, not just my personal reasons. Our Board action on May 15 was then sent via e-mail to WyoFile the afternoon of May 16, 2018.
    loren Grosskopf, chairman

    1. FYI—-The official mainstream Park County communication network which includes the e-mail server(s) was recently quarantined by Google for 1- 3 weeks for improprieties emanating from it , caused by a PC employee who somehow let in the digital nasties to her named account. Thus for a couple weeks Park County e-mails were blacklisted in one or both directions, and Google is not too swift to restore the service even after it’s been remedied…. there is some probationary protocol in place before full unfettered 2-way service is fully restored. may not yet have all its cyber privileges restored. This may have been part or all of the reason why the e-mails got treated a spam , or ????

      1. I feel icompelled to add this about the reaction by my Park County Commission a few years back in the context of changing long established public names of public things. Specifically, their own actions and a colorful renaming they perped.
        There was a well-used county road connecting the South Fork of the Shoshone River a/k/a Lower South Fork subdivisions and farms with the North Fork of the Shoshone River – a/k/a Wapiti Valley that traversed the south shores of Buffalo Bill Reservoir along the foot of Sheep Mountain . While that route had been in use well before Park County even existed , it was the county that gave it an official name back about 1990 give or take, when all the county roads were mapped and codified. . Many were named using a simple grid system…numerical north to south , alphabeticals west to east. The Sheep Mountain Road as we locals knew it in the vernacular was officially named and signed off by the Commish as Road 6 FU . Spoke out loud as Six Eff You.

        It was called that for about 25 years, used officially for everything, until some local social conservative types suddenly took umbrage with it…that ” Eff You ” thing. It became a tempest in a crock pot and flared up like a wildfire. The discourse raged for weeks. The County Commish unilaterally renamed the road to Stagecoach Trail. There was no precedent for calling it that except that they needed to call it something else…anything else … less lascivious to the weak minded thinner skinned pasture parishioners. If anyone could cite a historical reason for calling it Stagecoach Trail , the reason was so generic or nondescript that I do not recall why it was eventually selected. We all expected it to naturally be called the Sheep Mountain Road , but what does history tradition have to do with anything . Oh…

        I just thought I’d bring this instance to the fore after reading the reasons the Park County Inquisition cited for NOT renaming landmarks in Yellowstone given the real history behind those origin names. They speak with forked tongues on the issue of nomenclature. And no real grasp of history.

  2. Thank you, Angus, for your excellent coverage of this current public opportunity to learn and speak up regarding place name changes for future generations. How long must people be burdened by past actions not worthy in the consciousness of Americans today and in the future? Today is not one hundred years ago. We live here now freeing ourselves from the burdens of past conditioning no longer useful to our vision of who we are and strive to become. Equality and justice for all is a foundational value requiring action to become a reality. A call for action regarding these two national parks in Wyoming provides residents a wake-up call at this time. This is an opportunity!

  3. I’m with the native tribes. Change the names. I wouldn’t want someone who slaughtered my ancestors to have a tribute I must see, name, walk by daily.
    Seems another excuse to not change for some Wyomingites. Seems to be a trend through this states hardheadedness. Sad.

  4. It’s both reasonable and fair to rename so many of the landmarks in our region who were bestowed with awful monikers honoring dubious characters from the long marches of Manifest Destiny. But what the tribes propose to replace the onerous Anglo names with is hardly any better , just less loathsome. Generic at best. Nearly none of those tribes ever resided in Yellowstone, only traversed it on occasion if ever , so their standing is viewed with overt skepticism . Squatting rights and alluded degrees of temporal and spatial separation drawn from nomadic aboriginal pre-1870 are not necessarily applicable. Perhaps tribal historians could produce whatever placenames the First Peoples called the landmarks at the time, PreColumbian, transliterated into English just as so many other NW Wyoming features have been reckoned. Got historical nomenclature, Chief ? Got anything Clovis or Paleo ? The Sheepeaters actually lived in Yellowstone yearround and had all manner of names on their mental maps. Surely we can resurrect a few of those… put the real Sheepeater lore at the head of the list, well ahead of any Euro eponyms.

    The next peak south of Doane and Langford is named Plenty Coups after the great Crow warrior chief, deservedly . But the peak just north of the cluster on the Park Boundary is named Reservation Peak . I don’t hear much ballyhoo over that one. Or Canfield, or Hoyt, or Parker, or Miller, or Jones, or Atkins , or Humphries … like I said it’s a long list, and those are just anglicized peaks along the eastern boundary of the Park. I’ve ridden them all on horseback or visited by backpack or stood on their stoops. The names are meaningless.

    To my mind, the Yellowstone name in greatest need of change is the Lamar River – Little Lamar River – Lamar Peak. That watershed can righteously be said to be the most beautiful mountain enclave in the entire American West. The literate mountain man – fur trapper Osborne Russell said as much in his daily journal from the 1830’s , and I wholly agree. So why is the Lamar Valley named for a bureaucrat from Mississippi who was Secretary of the Interior for only three years in the late 1880’s and never set foot in Yellowstone that I’m aware … the long forgotten Lucius Quintanus Cincinnatus Lamar ? That guy needs streets in Rome named for him if not already , but not the most magical mountain valley in the Rockies. That transgression eclipses many of the other misnomers being discussed .

    Having said that , Doane the blood-stained soldier has to go. Hayden the scientist should have something named after him up in Yellowstone, just not the most lush magical grassy plateau in the ecosystem . Langford was one of the Founders of Yellowstone Park and its first superintendent, so he can stay. But there nevertheless remains a long list of names to supplant.

    ( We can name the concrete privvies out behind Devil’s Tower after Liz Cheney if she insists on monkeywrenching the process. )

  5. Howdy,
    Just two arguments: if petitioners claim that a name offends “many” people logic dictates that the number of offended vs. unoffended people should be the criterion for decision. Further: if killings by one namesake were a sufficient reason for name change – would that reasoning apply to all names given in honor of people who have killed sombody at sometime in their live?
    Happy trails