Opinion

“Welcome to Wyoming, the Frontier of America’s New Gilded Age.” That’s the title of an article about Teton County that appeared in The New York Times on March 2 of this year and again in an updated version on March 9. Under the general heading of “Billionaire Boom,” this article featured several photographs including a dramatic image of the Teton Range and another equally dramatic aerial view of Wyoming Highway 22 over Teton Pass. Highway 22 is the road many Jackson workers use to get from their homes in Idaho to their jobs in Wyoming. Often, these workers live in Idaho only because their jobs don’t pay enough for them to live on the Wyoming side of the pass. As Teton County’s Housing Director April Norton notes, “We’ve added 4,300 jobs in the last ten years but only added 300 year-round residents.” It’s a good bet the other 4,000 workers live in Idaho or south of Jackson in Lincoln County. Some even live in their cars as a friend of mine did when he worked in Jackson.

At 8,431 feet in elevation, Teton Pass presents beautiful views, but because of the steepness and length of the grade, the number and sharpness of curves in the road and the severe winter conditions including heavy snowfall, ice and avalanches, this highway section is one of the most dangerous in Wyoming. If I had my druthers and worked in Jackson, I’d want to live in town and avoid that drive except on a sunny summer day. But, you know, we live where we can afford to pay our bills.

Before I list some of the economic figures for Teton County mentioned in the Times story, I’d like to note the sources the paper consulted. These included the financial data companies Forbes and Bloomberg whose research focuses on business reporting, market analysis and wealth measurement, as well as the Internal Revenue Service, the Federal Reserve, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the U.S. Census Bureau.

According to these sources, Teton County, Wyoming, is the richest county in the country per capita and also the county with the highest wealth inequality in the country. The top 1% of households in the county have an estimated average annual income of around $35 million — 221 times more than the bottom 99%. I guess those of us in the bottom 99% are all in it together, though I have my doubts. Based on data from 2020 to 2024, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates Teton County’s median household income in 2024 dollars to be $124,172. That should be plenty, shouldn’t it? Maybe not. According to Rosie Read, founder of the Wyoming Immigrant Advocacy Project, “Immigrants often work as housekeepers, dishwashers and landscapers, and no one will pay them the $150,000 a year or more they need to live comfortably here.”

When I looked up recent public sector salary ranges that Teton County reported to the state, I found that firefighters, school teachers and police officers were generally paid $55,000 to $90,000 a year. For any other county in Wyoming those would be pretty good salaries and $150,000 would be very good indeed. But in 2025, the average single family home price in Jackson rose to above $7 million.

When I was a kid, my family moved from Oregon to Arizona because of my dad’s health. In Oregon, he had a good job with full union benefits in a Crown Zellerbach paper mill. In Arizona, a right-to-work state, he was told by his new employers, “You should just be thankful you have a job.” I can still see him storming around the kitchen shouting, “Right-to-work, my ass, it’s right-to-starve.”

While the billionaire boom is a national phenomenon, it’s particularly marked in Teton County where the total estimated wealth is $14.3 billion and the 2024 per capita income was estimated to be $532,903. Of course when the top 1% of the county’s households have a yearly income of $35 million, it’s hard to tell what the per capita figure really means for most people.

What about other counties? Niobrara is often listed as Wyoming’s poorest county with a total wealth of $602 million. According to the World Population Review, the current average per capita yearly income there is $46,467, while the median household income is $64,113. 

These figures reveal the ever-deepening gulf between the ultra-wealthy and everyone else. We’ve seen the results of such disparities in the past — social disorder and conflict driven by despair and resentment, coupled with political power driven by wealth at the expense of democratic values. By limiting wealth disparity, we can increase justice and social cohesion while offering the possibility of an economically stable and secure life for all.

After 10 years teaching in Artist-in-Schools programs throughout the western United States, David Romtvedt served for 22 years as a professor at the University of Wyoming.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *