As our nation approaches the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans have an opportunity — and an obligation — to reflect on the institutions that have preserved liberty through war, economic upheaval, political conflict and social change. Among the most important is an independent judiciary. 

Opinion

The Framers of the Constitution understood that freedom cannot survive if judges are merely extensions of political power. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 78 that the judiciary would serve as a bulwark against the “encroachments and oppressions” of the other branches. The Constitution sought to ensure that judges would answer not to popular passions, political movements, or elected officials, but to the law itself. 

History demonstrates why that independence matters. Throughout our nation’s journey — from the turbulent years after the Civil War to the constitutional challenges of the Great Depression, from the struggle for civil rights to the national crises following September  11 — courts have often been called upon to make difficult decisions that were unpopular in  the moment but essential to preserving constitutional principles. Judicial independence does not guarantee perfect decisions; Judges are human. It does, however, provide the  important framework necessary for fair and impartial judgment. 

Chief Justice John Roberts has repeatedly emphasized this principle. In 2018, he observed, “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.” His words captured a fundamental truth: the legitimacy of our courts rests on public confidence that justice is administered without fear, favor, or political allegiance. 

An independent judiciary is not a privilege reserved for judges. It is a protection for every citizen. It safeguards property rights, defends individual liberties, restrains government overreach, and ensures that disputes are resolved according to law rather than political influence. When judicial independence is weakened, every American’s rights become  weakened.

As we prepare to celebrate America’s monumental birthday, we should honor not only the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, but also the institutions that have sustained them for 2 1/2 centuries. Judicial independence has helped anchor the rule of law through some of the nation’s most challenging chapters. It has steadied our  democracy when passions ran high and political winds shifted.  

The United States did not reach 250 years among the world’s oldest continuing constitutional republics by accident. We endured because generation after generation defended the principle that no person is above the law and that courts must remain free to interpret and apply that law impartially.  

That principle deserves not only our respect but our unwavering commitment. As we look toward America’s next 250 years, we must protect the independence of our judiciary with the same determination that previous generations used to build and preserve it. 

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. AMEN!
    There is a reason why we have THREE branches of government. If there were just two, they could always neutralize each other. But three–overseeing different areas of public needs–results in a much more effective, and balanced government. The USA has never had the political struggles of many other “democratic” nations. The term “balance of power” has meaning and purpose!
    Alas, the recent overreach of our executive branch–coercing the legislative branch–has resulted in vilifying the judicial branch. And this coercion has almost ‘unbalanced’ our leaders’ powers. I fear for many moderates who would otherwise contribute to our society, but who may be too intimidated to risk running for office (& rightfully so).
    To the contrary, we–the USA–need our judicial branch to be strong now, more than ever!
    Frankly, I am no longer proud to claim Wyoming as my home state. TOO MANY extremists who seem to have little foresight about the effects of their desired policies on our long-term future.
    Balance! Moderation! Please!

  2. I could not agree more with what the authors of this piece have to say, and they, unlike many, know what they are talking about. The authors also exemplify the example of what a principled, independent judiciary is. I suggest that people who doubt the integrity of Wyoming’s judiciary should spend some time observing actual judicial proceedings. Every county has a courthouse so there’s at least one near everyone.

  3. Here’s a concise social media version:

    Thank you to Wyoming’s judges for their dedication to upholding the rule of law and our Constitution.

    Judicial independence isn’t about protecting judges—it’s about protecting the rights and freedoms of every Wyoming citizen. We don’t all have to agree with every court decision, but we should all value a judiciary that decides cases based on the law rather than political pressure.

    Thank you to our judges, clerks, and court staff for your professionalism, integrity, and public service. An independent judiciary is one of the cornerstones of our constitutional system, and Wyoming is stronger because of it.

  4. Independent Judiciary is only beneficial if the judiciary is honorable and of integrity. When this is not the case, there is no recourse.

  5. LOL, “independent judiciary” is a ridiculous sounding as an “Independent Federal Reserve”.

    Two corrupt institutions that in no way look out for the benefit of the American Public.