Wyoming lawmakers voted Friday night to override four of the governor’s line-item vetoes of the budget bill, all relating to state employees and their salaries. 

In his roughly two dozen vetoes of the state’s next two-year spending plan, Gov. Mark Gordon largely focused on separation of powers, as he has in years past. 

“In its simplest form, the legislature passes legislation and the executive branch enforces that legislation,” Gordon wrote Thursday in his budget letter. 

“Likewise, the legislature appropriates funds for the running of state government. The executive branch sees that those funds are used expeditiously and efficiently,” he continued. “It is not the role (though it may be an understandable temptation) of the legislature to attempt to assume the extent of executive functions such as deciding how many positions, the level of individual pay, or the classification of specific employees of the executive branch.”

Lawmakers pushed back Friday, starting in the Senate, where such motions were required to originate this year. The two chambers alternate having that responsibility every budget session. The Senate voted to override seven of Gordon’s vetoes. 

House leadership had indicated an appetite for additional overrides, Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, R-Hulett, told the lower chamber Friday night. 

“There were many more that were offered,” Neiman said. 

Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, R-Hulett, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The Senate’s budget position — which lawmakers in both chambers largely favored in the final budget bill — aligned more closely with the governor’s recommendations. 

“But these seven were the ones chosen by the body to the West of us, and they established this line,” Neiman said. 

To override a line-item veto in the budget, two-thirds of elected members in both chambers must approve. Ultimately, the House approved four of the seven veto overrides to the budget bill. 

The overrides

While lawmakers approved Gordon’s request to increase state employee pay, both the House and Senate voted to override his decision to strike language to allow the Legislature to specify the “number of employees.” 

Gordon argued such a determination is up to the executive branch. Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, disagreed. 

“The Legislature has authorized the number of employees since 1971 in its current form and previously did so in a different form,” Hicks said on the Senate floor. 

Sen. Charlie Scott, R-Casper, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Sen. Charles Scott, R-Casper, also spoke in favor of the override, but “for slightly different reasons,” he said. 

As the longest serving member in the Legislature, Scott said he’s seen that having such language in the budget bill “has been a very effective way for us to control the total size of state government.” 

The Senate voted 23-6 with two excused lawmakers to approve the override. With the exception of two lawmakers who were either excused or absent, the House voted unanimously in favor of the motion. 

On page 49 of the budget bill, Gordon struck language to reclassify the Wyoming Charter School Authorization Board’s executive director the next time the position is vacant. 

Gov. Mark Gordon addresses lawmakers Monday, Feb. 9, 2026, during his State of the State address at the Capitol in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Sen. Gary Crum, R-Laramie, said such classification was needed to align the position more closely with other executive-level positions in the department. In the House, Rep. Bill Allemand, R-Midwest, said the position’s salary was “considerably more” than those at the same executive level, and it “caused a lot of problems” in the rest of the education agency. 

The House voted 57-3 with one lawmaker excused and another absent to approve the veto override. The Senate voted 29-0, with two lawmakers excused, in favor of the motion. 

The other two veto overrides adopted by the Legislature specifically related to salary increases. 

Gordon had vetoed language to limit the executive branch’s ability to move funds around in the payroll section of the budget to provide salary increases. 

Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson, said “governors have vetoed this multiple times” in the past, “and when in session, the Legislature has overridden that veto.”

Such was the case this year, too. Lastly, lawmakers voted to override Gordon’s decision to strike language prohibiting the executive branch from increasing salaries using savings from vacancies. 

Meanwhile, the House rejected three veto overrides approved in the Senate. One of those would have overturned Gordon’s decision to strike language requiring the University of Wyoming to identify $5 million in cost savings. 

What now?

At publishing time, Gordon had so far vetoed a single piece of legislation from the 2026 session — Senate File 119, “Strategic investments and projects account-repeal-2.”

Lawmakers will have the opportunity to override Gordon’s decision on Wednesday, alongside any other potential vetoes, when the Legislature convenes for its final day of the session.

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *