Wyoming voters will soon be required to provide proof of residency and U.S. citizenship when registering to vote. First, however, the public will have a chance to offer feedback that could help determine some of the finer details of the new process. 

In February, the Wyoming Legislature passed House Bill 156, “Proof of voter residency-registration qualifications,” before Gov. Mark Gordon let it become law without his signature. 

Sponsored by Gillette Republican and former Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. John Bear, the law is set to go into effect July 1. It requires a person to be a Wyoming resident for at least 30 days before voting in an election, along with a requirement to provide proof of residency and citizenship when registering to vote. 

While the law specifies what documents provide such proof, it also calls on the secretary of state to iron out the technicalities through the rulemaking process, which requires a public comment period. 

“Ensuring that those who register to vote in Wyoming must provide proof of U.S. citizenship and proof of Wyoming residency is pivotal to election integrity and security for Wyoming,” Secretary of State Chuck Gray said in a statement Monday. 

Gray and some Republican lawmakers have been pushing to add election security measures in Wyoming for the past several years. They maintain that proof of residency and citizenship are necessary to ensure that only Wyoming residents vote in Wyoming elections. 

Instances of voter fraud remain statistically rare in Wyoming. There have been four convictions of voter fraud in Wyoming since 2000, according to a database created by The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. All four cases involved U.S. citizens. 

In 2024, Gray attempted to make similar changes through the rulemaking process, but Gordon rejected the rules, arguing the regulations exceeded the scope of the secretary’s legal authority. 

“Unless and until the Legislature grants the Secretary of State more explicit authority allowing for rulemaking to add to those statutory requirements at the time of registration, I believe these rules are a breach of the separation of powers with the legislative branch, as indicated by the Management Council’s recommendation,” Gordon wrote in a letter at the time. 

The new law, which was a top priority of Gray’s in the 2025 session, explicitly grants the secretary of state the authority. 

The public comment period is open until June 20. Afterwards, it will once again be up to the governor to approve or reject the proposed rules. 

Secretary of State Chuck Gray testifies at the House Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee on Jan. 15, 2025. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Details

In many instances, a valid Wyoming driver’s license will suffice for proof of identity, residency and U.S. citizenship when registering to vote as long as it lists a Wyoming address, under Gray’s proposed rules. 

When discussing the proposed rules last year, county clerks raised concerns about residents with P.O. boxes on their driver’s licenses — particularly those in Teton County — being disenfranchised. 

The rules now up for consideration specify P.O. boxes in Wyoming would count as proof of residence, so long as the person lists their residential address on their voter registration application form. 

As is now the case, tribal identification cards issued by either the Eastern Shoshone or the Northern Arapaho tribes, or other federally recognized tribes, will also count as proof of residency if a Wyoming address is listed. 

If the applicant does not have a valid Wyoming driver’s license or a tribal ID card present at the time of application, the law specifies that they provide their driver’s license number and at least one of the following documents: a valid U.S. passport; a driver’s license or ID card issued by the federal government, any U.S. state or occupied territory; a photo identification card issued by the University of Wyoming, a Wyoming community college or a Wyoming public school; a U.S. military card; an ID card issued to a dependent of a member of the U.S. armed forces or a tribal ID card. 

Under the proposed rules, those documents would also need to list a Wyoming address to constitute proof of residency. 

If applicants do not have a driver’s license, they will be asked to provide the last four digits of their Social Security number along with one of the aforementioned documents. 

The proposed rules also lay out a process for other instances, such as if an applicant does not have any of those forms of identification or if they lack both a Wyoming driver’s license and a Social Security number. Those situations will require other forms of documentation, such as a utility bill, bank statement or any other government document showing their name and address. 

As for proof of U.S. citizenship, the rules propose mirroring the documentation already outlined in law, including a Wyoming driver’s license, Wyoming ID card, a valid U.S. passport, a certificate of U.S. citizenship, a certificate of naturalization, a U.S. military draft record or a selective service registration acknowledgement card, a consular report of birth abroad issued by the U.S. department of state or an original or certified copy of a birth certificate in the U.S. bearing an official seal. 

None of those documents, however, will suffice if they indicate the person is not a U.S. citizen. 

What’s next?

The proposed rules may be read here — the changes are the underlined text in the last five pages of the document. 

Public comments may be sent directly to joe.rubino1@wyo.gov or via the rules system until June 20. 

A public hearing has also been set for 3 p.m. June 4 at the Capitol Extension Conference Center Auditorium in Cheyenne. Members of the public may attend virtually by registering via Zoom here

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. When it comes to chuck gray, the freedom caucus and the maga gop, the “election problems” they want you to somehow believe are nothing but self-inflicted injuries. Their agenda has never been to fix “election integrity”. The goal is to make voting as difficult as possible. They want to propagandize voters into losing faith in the process and into giving up our rights, so they will have absolute power and control. There will be banana republic style elections where valid opposition votes are rejected on administrative technicalities–remember 2000 and the “hanging chads” in Florida? That election truly was stolen and not by Democrats. Perhaps, if trump-ism succeeds, we will eventually have rigged elections and there will be no unbiased courts left to contest them.

  2. I believe anyone who is a resident of Wyoming should be allowed to vote in state elections. Residents pay taxes. Taxation without representation is un-American. Chuck Gray needs to be removed because he does not understand this founding principle.

  3. More non-problems the do nothing GOP can pretend to “fix” that only makes everything hard for citizens of both parties.

  4. Forty five election bills. Such a waste of our legislature and tax dollars. Wyoming is quite honest in their voting integrity as studies show. Hopefully the next session, although a budget session, will put Wyoming problems first instead of the “feel good” national agenda.
    We need to remember this debacle when it comes time to vote. Hopefully we will have a better choice of candidates. If not, feel free to write someone in.

  5. This bill being proposed states the goal is to strengthen election integrity, but there is not a problem with election integrity in Wyoming. The real goal is to make it hard to register to vote and disenfranchise large groups of voters in Wyoming. The Heritage Foundation (very conservative group) reports 4 fraudulent votes (and they provide the names of the people ) FROM 1982-2024. FORTY TWO years and 4 fraudulent votes — this bill is such a waste of money and time gaslighting a problem that does not exist.

  6. There should be a law that requires a person to have lived in Wyoming for at least 5 years before he/she can run for office.